Trade law Part 17

 

Parallel Trade in Europe-Intellectual Property, Competition and Regulatory Law
Lianos, Ioannis
European Competition Journal
Volume 5, Number 2, August 2009 p.637-639

Competition policies and laws: major concepts and an overview of Ethiopian Trade Practice Law
H. Haroye
Mizan Law Review
Volume 2, Number 1, 2008 p.33-51

International trade law : the Impact of Justiciability and Separations of Powers in EC Law
Thomas Cottier
European Constitutional Law Review
Volume 5, Issue 2, June 2009 p.307-326

Z. Yihdego, The Arms Trade and International Law, Studies in International Law, Vol. 15, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2007, x + 311 pp., UK£ 50. ISBN 978-1-84113-746-9.
G.R. den Dekker
Netherlands International Law Review
Volume 56, Issue 2, August 2009 p.283-285

Poverty, Hunger and International Trade: What’s Law Got to Do with It? Current Mechanisms and the Doha Development Agenda
Christine Kaufmann and Minna Grosz
German Yearbook of International Law
Volume 51, 2008 p.75

Depreciation in Canadian Trade-Mark Law: A Remedy in Search of a Wrong
William Michael Darling
Intellectual Property Journal
Volume 21, 2007-2008 p.49

The Doctrine of Functionality in Trade-mark Law Post Kirkbi
Teresa Scassa
Intellectual Property Journal
Volume 21, 2007-2008 p.87

Carole Murray, David Holloway and Daren Timson-Hunt, Schmitthofs Export Trade: The Law and Practice of International Trade (11th edn.)
Review by NICHOLAS SUMMERS
International Trade and Business Law Review
Volume 12, 2009 p.424

The 2009 review of Australian consumer law – An opportunity to reconsider and clarify the rationale and scope of s 51A of the Trade Practices Act
Aviva Freilich and Eileen Webb
Competition & Consumer Law Journal
Volume 17, Number 1, August 2009 p.80

Germany, Sup. Ct., 20 May 2008 – Establishment of damages – Confidentiality agreement – Bearer of secrets agreeing to keep secret details of work (and its results) in development of which he is to participate – Breach of confidentiality agreement by application for utility model based on work – German law relating to confidentiality agreements, trade secrets, utility models and damages X ZR 6/06 – “Confidentiality Agreement”
International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume 40, Number 4, 2009 p.472

Trade Mark Law
International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume 40, Number 4, 2009

Trade Unions’ Law Evolution in Post-Soviet Countries: The Experiences of Lithuania and Russia
Nikita Lyutov and Daiva Petrylaite
Comparative Labor law & Policy Journal
Volume 30, Number 4, Summer 2009 p.779

COLONIZING NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVING MARINE WILDLIFE THROUGH WORLD Trade law
Eric A. Bilsky
Michigan Journal of International Law
Volume 30, Number 3, Spring 2009 p.599

Still a troublesome area: Legislative and Common law restrictions on indemnity and insurance arrangements effected by companies on behalf of officers and employees
Perry Herzfeld
Company and Securities Law Journal
Volume 27, Number 5, August 2009 p.267

There are a number of areas of uncertainty regarding the restrictions on the ability of companies to indemnify and procure insurance for their officers and employees imposed by ss 199A and 199B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and s 77A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), as well as the Common law . This article considers a number of these uncertainties, including the meaning of “conduct in good faith”, “criminal proceedings”and “wilful breach of duty” in the legislative provisions; the effect of those provisions on the coverage of “innocent”directors; the application of legislative restrictions on indemnities to policies of insurance; and the common law’s attitude to indemnity and insurance against fines and penalties. It suggests a number of legislative reforms to address these uncertainties.

FINDING ANOTHER LINK IN THE CHAIN: INTERNATIONAL Treaties AND DEVOLUTION TO LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE CASE OF THE CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES
Jonathan Liljeblad
Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal
Volume 18, Number 3, Spring 2009 p.527

Border Searches of Laptop Computers after United States v. Arnold: Implications for Traveling Professionals
Cooper Offenbecher
Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
Volume 5, Issue 2, Autumn 2008

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that border searches of laptop computers do not require reasonable suspicion. The decision, in United States v. Arnold, reflects the continued intent of the Ninth Circuit-along with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals-to continue analyzing laptop computer searches under the traditional border search doctrine. This article will examine recent laptop computer search cases in light of the border search doctrine and will consider the implications for lawyers and business professionals who travel abroad with confidential information on laptops and other electronic-storage devices. The article will also consider the implications of such searches on the ethical duty of confidentiality, the Attorney -client privilege, and trade secrets law.

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

Attorney, Common law, International trade law, Labor law, Trade law, Treaties.