Industrial Sociology

Industrial Sociology

Resources

See Also

  • Working Condition
  • Working Time
  • Occupational Health
  • Work Environment
  • Labor Law
  • Legal Working Age

Further Reading

  • Abbott, A. (1992). What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Abrams, P. (1982). Historical sociology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Abu-Lughod, J. (1991). Before European hegemony: The world system A.D. 1250–1350. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Adams, J. (2005). The familial state: Ruling families and merchant capitalism in early modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Adams, J., Clemens, E. S., & Orloff, A. S. (2005). Introduction: Social theory, modernity, and the three waves of historical sociology. In J. Adams, E. S. Clemens, and A. S. Orloff (Eds.), Remaking modernity: Politics, history, and sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Anderson, P. (1974). Lineages of the absolutist state. London: New Left Books.
  • Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. New York: Verso.
  • Krasner, S. D. (1976). State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics, 28(3), 317–343.
  • Krasner, S. D. (Ed.). (1983). International regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Kratochwil, F. (1989). Norms, rules, and decisions. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Krippner, G. R. (2011). Capitalizing on crisis: The political origins of the rise of finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lachmann, R. (2013). What is historical sociology? Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  • Lake, D. A. (1988). Power, protection, and free trade: International sources of U.S. commercial strategy, 1887–1939. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Lattimore, O. (1962). Studies in frontier history. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Lawson, G., & Shilliam, R. (2010). Sociology and international relations: Legacies and prospects. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(1), 69–86.
  • Lechner, F., & John Boli (Eds.). (2011). The globalization reader (4th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Lewis, A. R. (1988). Nomads and crusaders. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Linklater, A. (1998). The transformation of political community. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Linklater, A. (2005). Dialogic politics and the civilizing process. Review of International Studies, 31, 141–154.
  • Linklater, A. (2007). Towards a sociology of global morals with an “emancipatory intent.” Review of International Studies, 33, 135–150.
  • Linklater A., & Suganami, H. (2006). The English school of international relations: A contemporary reassessment. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mahoney, J. (2010). Colonialism and postcolonial development: Spanish America in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mahoney, J., Kimball, E., & Koivu, K. L. (2009). The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences. Comparative Political Studies, 42(1), 114–146.
  • Mann, M. (1984). The autonomous powers of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology, 25(2), 185–213.
  • Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power: A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Vol. 1. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mann, M. (1993). The sources of social power: The rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914. Vol. 2. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mann, M. (2003). Incoherent empire. London: Verso.
  • Mann, M. (2012). The sources of social power: Global empires and revolution, 1890–1945. Vol. 3. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mann, M. (2013). The sources of social power: Globalizations, 1945–2011. Vol. 4. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McNeil, W. H. (1963). The rise of the West. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • McNeil, W. H. (1967). A world history. London: Oxford University Press.
  • McNeil, W. H. (1979). Plagues and peoples. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
  • McNeil, W. H. (1984). The pursuit of power. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • McNeil, W. H. (1991). The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community. Originally published in 1963. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McSweeney, B. (1999). Security, identity and interests: A sociology of international relations. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181.
  • Millennium: Journal of International Studies. (2014). Special issue: Rethinking the standard(s) of civilizations in international relations, 42(3).
  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Moore, B. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon.
  • Mozaffari, M. (2000). Mega civilization: Global capital and the new standard of ‘civilization’. In S. F. Krishna-Hensel (Ed.), The new millennium. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Mozaffari, M. (2001). The transformationalist perspective and the rise of a global standard of civilization. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 1(2), 247–264.
  • Mozaffari, M. (Ed.). (2002). Globalization and civilizations. London: Routledge.
  • Navari, C., & Green, D. (Eds.). (2014). Guide to the English school in international studies. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Nettl, J. P. (1968). The State as Conceptual Variable. World Politics, 20(4), 559–592.
  • Neumann, I. (1996). Self and other in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 2(2), 139–174.
  • Neumann, I. (1999). The uses of other: The East in European identity relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • O’Brian, R. & Williams, M. (2013). Global political economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • O’Hagan, J. (2002). Conceptualising the West in international relations. New York: Palgrave.
  • Onuf, N. (1989). World of our making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
  • Orloff, A. S. (1993). The politics of pensions: A comparative analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880s–1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Page, E. C. (1990). The political origins of self-government and bureaucracy: Otto Hintze’s conceptual map of Europe. Political Studies, 38(1), 39–55.
  • Paige, J. (1975). Agrarian revolution. New York: Free Press.
  • Paige, J. (1999). Conjuncture, comparison, and conditional theory in macrosocial inquiry. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 781–800.
  • Parsons, T. (1966). Societies: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Parsons, T. (1977). The evolution of societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Poggi, G. (1978). The development of the modern state. London: Hutchinson.
  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon.
  • Prasad, M. (2006). The politics of free markets: The rise of neoliberal economic policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Prasad, M. (2012). The land of too much: American abundance and the paradox of poverty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Pula, B. (2015). Institutionalizing a weak state: Law and jurisdictional conflict between bureaucratic and communal Institutions in the Albanian Highlands. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 57(3), 1–28.
  • Reus-Smit, C. (1999). The moral purpose of the state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Reus-Smit, C. (2002). The idea of history and history with ideas. In S. Hobden & J. Hobson (Eds.), Historical sociology of international relations (pp. 120–140). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: SAGE.
  • Rogowski, R. (1989). Commerce and coalitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rosecrance, R. (1973). International relations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Rosenberg, J. (1994). The empire of civil society. London: Verso.
  • Roy, W. G. 1997. Socializing capital: The rise of the large industrial corporation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ruggie, J. G. (1983). Continuity and transformation in the world polity. World Politics, 35(2), 261–285.
  • Ruggie, J. G. (Ed.). (1993). Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution. In J. Ruggie (Ed.), Multilateralism matters (pp. 3–47). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Ruggie, J. G. (1998). Constructing world polity. London: Routledge.
  • Runciman, W. (1989). A treatise on social theory. Vol. II. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Salter, M. (2002). Barbarians and civilization in international relations. London: Pluto Press.
  • Sandholtz, W., & Stiles, K. (2009). International norms and cycles of change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its discontents. New York: New Press.
  • Scholte, J. (1993). International relations of social change. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press.
  • Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1996). Three temporalities: Toward an eventful sociology. In T. McDonald (Ed.), The historic turn in the human Sciences (pp. 245–280). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Shaw, M. (Ed.). (1984). War, state and society. London: Macmillan.
  • Shaw, M. (1988). Dialectics of war. London: Pluto.
  • Shaw, M. (1991). Post-military society. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
  • Shaw, M. (1994). Global society and international relations. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
  • Shaw, M. (2002). Globality and historical sociology. In S. Hobden & J. Hobson (Eds.), Historical sociology of international relations (pp. 82–98). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sinclair, A. (2010). International relations theory and international law: A critical approach. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Skocpol, T. (1977). Wallerstein’s world capitalist system: A theoretical and historical critique. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 1075–1090.
  • Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: Strategies and analysis of current research. In P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Slaughter, A. M. (1995). Liberal international relations theory and international economic law. American University International Law Review, 10(2), 717–743.
  • Slaughter Burley, A. M. (1993). International law and international relations theory: A dual agenda. American Journal of International Law, 87(2), 205–239.
  • Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations. New York: Random House.
  • Smith, D. A. (1991). The rise of historical sociology. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Smith, D. A. (1996). Third World cities in global perspective: The political economy of uneven urbanization. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Spengler, O. (1918). The decline of the West. In A. Helps & H. Werner (Eds.), C. F. Atkinson (Trans.) (1991). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Spruyt, H. (1994). The sovereign state and its competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Spruyt, H. (1998). Historical sociology and systems theory in international relations. Review of International Political Economy, 5(2), 340–353.
  • Steinmetz, G. (1998). Critical realism and historical sociology. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40(1), 170–187.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2007). The devil’s handwriting: Precoloniality and the German colonial state in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2010). Ideas in exile: Refugees from Nazi Germany and the failure to transplant historical sociology into the United States. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 23(1), 1–27.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2014). The sociology of empires, colonies, and postcolonialism. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 77–103.
  • Stivachtis, Y. (1998). The enlargement of international society. London: Macmillan.
  • Stivachtis, Y. (2008). Civilization and international society: The case of European Union expansion. Contemporary Politics, 14(1), 71–90.
  • Stivachtis, Y. (2014). The regional dimension of international society. In C. Navari & D. Green (Eds.), Guide to the English school in international studies (pp. 109–126). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Stivachtis, Y. (Ed.). (2015). Interrogating regional international societies, Questioning global international society. Special issue of the journal of Global Discourse, 5(3).
  • Stivachtis, Y. (Ed.). (2018). World society in English School theory. Special issue of the journal of International Politics, 19(1).
  • Strange, S. (1970). International economics and international relations: A case of mutual neglect. International Affairs, 46(2), 304–315.
  • Strange, S. (1998). International political economy: Beyond economics and international relations. Economies et Sociétés, 34(4), 3–24.
  • Thomas, G., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987). Institutional structure: Constituting state, society and the individual. London: SAGE.
  • Thompson, J. (1994). Mercenaries, pirates, and sovereigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tilly, C. (1975). The formation of national states in western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Tilly, C. (1981). As sociology meets history. New York: Academic Press.
  • Tilly, C. (1984). Big structures, long processes, huge comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1992. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Todd, E. (2003). After the empire: The breakdown of American order. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Toynbee, A. (1947). A study of history. Abridgement of Volumes I-VI. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Toynbee, A. (1953). The world and the West. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Toynbee, A. (1957). A study of history. Abridgement of Volumes VII–X. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Tracy, J. D. (Ed.). (1990). The rise of merchant empires. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tracy, J. D. (Ed.). (1991). The political economy of merchant empires. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vincent, R. J. (1983). Change and international relations. Review of International Studies, 9(1), 63–77.
  • Walker, R. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations in political theory. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1974a). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 387–415.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1974b). The modern world-system. New York: Academic Press.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world-economy. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1983). Historical capitalism. London: Verso.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1986). Reflections on theory of international politics: A response to my critics. In R. Keohane (Ed.), Neorealism and its critics (pp. 322–345). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Watson, A. (1987). Hedley Bull, state systems and international studies. Review of International Studies, 13(2), 147–153.
  • Watson, A. (1990). Systems of states. Review of International Studies, 16(2), 99–109.
  • Watson, A. (1992). The evolution of international society. London: Routledge.
  • Watson, M. (2005). Foundations of international political economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Weber, C. (1995). Simulating sovereignty. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wendt, A., & Friedheim, D. (1996). Hierarchy under anarchy: Informal empire and the East German state. In T. Biersteker & C. Weber (Eds.), State sovereignty as social construct (pp. 240–277). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wight, M. (1977). Systems of states. Leicester, U.K.: Leicester University Press.
  • Wimmer, A. (2012). Waves of war: Nationalism, state formation, and ethnic exclusion in the modern world. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wimmer, A. (2014). War. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 173–197.
  • Wolf, E. R. 1969. Peasant wars of the twentieth century. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Yalvaç, F. (1991). The sociology of the state and the sociology of international relations. In M. Banks and M. Shaw (Eds.), State and society in international relations. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Zielonka, J. (2006). Europe as empire: The nature of the enlarged EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Distributive Justice

    International or Global Distributive Justice

    Resources

    See Also

    • Foreign Policy
    • Foreign Affairs
    • International Relations

    Further Reading

    Hierarchical Display of Industrial sociology

    Science > Humanities > Social sciences > Sociology
    Employment And Working Conditions > Organisation of work and working conditions > Organisation of work
    Employment And Working Conditions > Organisation of work and working conditions > Working conditions

    Industrial sociology

    Concept of Industrial sociology

    See the dictionary definition of Industrial sociology.

    Characteristics of Industrial sociology

    [rtbs name=”xxx-xxx”]

    Resources

    Translation of Industrial sociology

    Thesaurus of Industrial sociology

    Science > Humanities > Social sciences > Sociology > Industrial sociology
    Employment And Working Conditions > Organisation of work and working conditions > Organisation of work > Industrial sociology
    Employment And Working Conditions > Organisation of work and working conditions > Working conditions > Industrial sociology

    See also

    Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *