Refugees Part 6

Refugees Part 6

 

89

FOR BETTER OR WORSE: A DISCUSSION OF THE BIA’S AMBIGUOUS C-Y-Z DECISION AND ITS LEGACY FOR Refugees OF CHINA’S ONE CHILD POLICY
Meredith M. Snyder
Washington University Law Review
Volume 84, Number 6, 2006 p.1541

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

90

Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-Refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 ProLaw Journal / Law Reviewol UNHCR
European Human Rights Law Review
Issue 5, 2007 p.483

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

91

Separated Children: A Comparison of the Treatment of Separated Child Refugees Entering Australia and Canada
Fiona Martin and Jennifer Curran
International Journal of Refugee Law
Volume 19, Number 3, October 2007 p.440-470

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

92

The Formation and Development of the Legislation on Refugees in the Republic of Belarus doi:10.1093/ijrl/eem017
Ilija Todorovic and Yury Morgun
International Journal of Refugee Law
Volume 19, Number 3, October 2007 p.511-535

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

93

The State of the World’s Refugees: Human Displacement in the New Millennium
Alice Edwards
International Journal of Refugee Law
Volume 19, Number 3, October 2007 p.595-598

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

94

The Tragic Plight of HIV-Infected Haitian Refugees at Guantanamo Bay
NICOLA WHITE
Liverpool Law Review
Volume 28, Number 2, September 2007 p.249-269

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

95

Female Refugees: Re-Victimized by the Material Support to Terrorism Bar
Kara Beth Stein
McGeorge Law Review
Volume 38, Issue 3, 2007 p.815

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

96

Safe to go home? The implications of the High Court decision for Afghan and Iraqi temporary refugees: MIMIA v QAAH of 2004
Hossein Esmaeili and Suzanne Carlton
Alternative Law Journal
Volume 32, Number 2, June 2007

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

This article reviews the background leading to the High Court’s decision in MIMA v QAAH of 2004 and analyses the decision of the majority and the dissenting opinion. Discussing the implication of the decision on Iraqi and Afghan temporary visa holders, the article provides an expert analysis of the country situations both in Iraq and Afghanistan and concludes that the current volatile situation in those countries does not support the return of temporary visa holders.

97

THE NEW FACE OF AMERICA’S REFUGEES: AFRICAN REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT TO THE UNITED STATES
Heidi H. Boas
Georgetown Immigration Law Journal
Volume 21, Number 3, Spring 2007 p.431

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

98

James C. Hathaway: The Rights of Refugees under International Law
Laubner
German Yearbook of International Law
Volume 49, 2006 p.706

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

99

North Korean Refugees and International Refugee Law
Elim Chan and Andreas Schloenhardt
International Journal of Refugee Law
Volume 19, Number 2, July 2007 p.215-245

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

100

Creating Legal Space for Refugees in India: the Milestones Crossed and the Roadmap for the Future
Prabodh Saxena
International Journal of Refugee Law
Volume 19, Number 2, July 2007 p.246-272

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

101

Outline of Submissions on Behalf of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (As Amicus Curiae): In the High Court Of Australia
International Journal of Refugee Law
Volume 19, Number 2, July 2007 p.360-371

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

102

Guidelines on International Protection: The application of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 ProLaw Journal / Law Reviewol relating to the Status of Refugees to victims of trafficking and persons at risk of being trafficked
International Journal of Refugee Law
Volume 19, Number 2, July 2007 p.372-390

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

103

Counterproductive and Counterintuitive Counterterrorism: The Post-September 11 Treatment of Refugees and Asylum-Seekers
Marisa Silenzi Cianciarulo
Denver University Law Review
Volume 84, Issue 4, 2007 p.1121

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

104

Protection Elsewhere: The Legal Implications Of Requiring Refugees To Seek Protection In Another State
Michelle Foster
Michigan Journal of International Law
Volume 28, Number 2, Winter 2007 p.223

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

105

Closing The Door To Refugees: The Denial Of Due Process For Refugee Claimants In Canada
Stacey A. Saufert
Saskatchewan Law Review
Volume 70, Number 1, 2007 p.27

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

106

Immigration Law — Maharaj v. Gonzales: Promoting The “Offer-Based Approach”When Determining “Firm Resettlement”Of Refugees In Another country
American Journal of Trial Advocacy
Volume 30, Number 3, Spring 2007 p.693

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

107

ARTICLES A Critique Of The Rights Of Refugees Under The OAU Convention Governing The Specific Aspects Of Refugee Problems In Africa
O.S. Oyelade
East African Journal of Peace & Human Rights
Volume 12, Number 2, 2006 p.152

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

108

Tokyo High Court, Judgment, April 12, 2006
Japanese Yearbook of International Law
Volume 49, 2006 p.160

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

Article 1 A (2) of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (1951) – Definition of the Term ‘Being Persecuted’ – Discrimination against Women Forced Marriage – Honor Killings

109

The Rights of Refugees under International Law
James Hathaway
International Journal of Discrimination and the Law
Volume 8, Number 4, 2007 p.295

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

110

J.C. Hathaway, The Rights of Refugees Under International Law
Catherine Phuong
Human Rights Law Review
Volume 7, Number 2, 2007 p.433-435

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

111

Adapting to Changing Legal Frameworks: Mozambican Refugees in South Africa
Tara Polzer
International Journal of Refugee Law
Volume 19, Number 1, March 2007 p.22-50

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

 

Conclusion

Notes

See Also

References and Further Reading

About the Author/s and Reviewer/s

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

Advocacy, Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, Due Process, Refugees, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, country.


Posted

in

, ,

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *