International Criminal Court Part 39

 

The Quivering Gulliver: U.S. Views on a Permanent International Criminal Court
John E. Murphy
International Lawyer
Volume 34, Number 1, Spring 2000 p.45

Denouncing the International Criminal Court: An Examination of U.S. Objections to the Rome Statute
John Seguin
Boston University International Law Journal
Volume 18, Number 1, Spring 2000 p.85

U.S. Resistance to the International Criminal Court: Is the Sword Mightier than the Law?
Lynn Sellers Bickley
Emory International Law Review
Volume 14, Number 1, Spring 2000 p.213

The New International Criminal Court: An Uneasy Revolution
Leila Nadya Sadat and S. Richard Carden
Georgetown Law Journal
Volume 88, Number 3, March 2000 p.381

HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS: International Criminal Court
Leiden Journal of International Law
Volume 13, Number 1, March 2000

THE STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AND THIRD STATES
Gennady M. Danilenko
Michigan Journal of International Law
Volume 21, Number 3, Spring 2000 p.445

The Globalisation of Criminal Justice: Will the International Criminal Court Become a Reality?
Hon Justice Goddard
Canterbury Law Review
Volume 7, 443-557, 2000 p.452

HUMAN “WRONGS”?: THE U.S. TAKES AN UNPOPULAR STANCE IN OPPOSING A STRONG INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, GAINING UNLIKELY ALLIES IN THE PROCESS
TOMAS A. KUEHN
Pepperdine Law Review
Volume 27, Number 2, January 2000 p.299

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: A BUDGET OF PARADOXES
Edward M. Wise
Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law
Volume 8, Spring 2000 p.261

The Status, Role and Accountability of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court: A Comparative Overview on the Basis of 33 National Reports
Kai Ambos
European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Volume 8, Number 2, 2000 p.89

The Statute of International Criminal Court: A Documentary History
Gail A. Partin
International Journal of Legal Information
Volume 28, Number 2, Summer 2000 p.449

Why Perpetrators Should Not Always Be Prosecuted: Where the International Criminal Court and Truth Commissions Meet
Charles Villa-Vicencio
Emory Law Journal
Volume 49, Number 1, Winter 2000 p.205

Lee, Roy S. The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute-Issues, Negotiations, Results
Benjamin B. Ferencz
American Journal of International Law
Volume 94, Number 1, January 2000 p.218

A GLOBAL WAR ON DRUGS: WHY THE UNITED STATES SHOULD SUPPORT THE PROSECUTION OF DRUG TRAFFICKERS IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
Molly McConville
American Criminal Law Review
Volume 37, Number 1, Winter 2000 p.75

The International Criminal Court: Assessing the Jurisdictional Loopholes in the Rome Statute
Melissa K. Marler
Duke Law Journal
Volume 49, Number 3, December 1999 p.825

Israel Rejects Its Own Offspring: The International Criminal Court
Ayelet Levy
Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review
Volume 22, Number 2, December 1999 p.207

Command Responsibility of Non-Military Superiors in the International Criminal Court (ICC)
Gregg R. Vetter
Yale Journal of International Law
Volume 25, Number 1, Winter 2000 p.89

The International Criminal Court: The Nations of the World Must Not Give in to all of the United States Demands if the Court is to be a Strong, Independent, International Organ
Suffolk Transnational Law Review
Volume 23, Number 1, Winter 1999 p.327

War Crimes: A Human Rights Approach to a Humanitarian Law Problem at the International Criminal Court
Audrey I. Benison
Georgetown Law Journal
Volume 88, Number 1, November 1999 p.141

National Sovereignty: Must it be Sacrificed to the International Criminal Court?
David A. Nill
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
Volume 14, Number 1, 1999 p.119

GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE UNITED STATES: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
Shannon K. Supple
Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly
Volume 27, Number 1, Fall 1999 p.181

In 1998, the United Nations finalized an International Criminal Court statute. The purpose of this statute was to create an international tribunal, through which the international community could investigate and, if required, prosecute crimes of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. An overwhelming majority of the United Nations delegates signed the statute, with a promise to bring the document back to their countries for ratification. The United States was one of only seven states to oppose the statute because, it claimed, it contained insufficient safeguards in light of the rights granted by the United States Constitution. This Note addresses these concerns and argues that the statute comports with the Constitution. This Note also advocates that the United States sign and ratify the statute, to join the global community in bringing an end to impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern.

RATIFY OR REJECT: EXAMINING THE UNITED STATES’ OPPOSITION TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
Matthew A. Barrett
Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law
Volume 28, Number 1, Fall 1999 p.83

Politics, International Justice, and the United States: Toward a Permanent International Criminal Court
Giulio M. Gallarotti & Arik Y. Preis
UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs
Volume 4, Number 1, Spring/Summer 1999 p.1

 

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

International Criminal Court.