Civil Litigation for Regulating Climate Change
There are interlinked policy, science, legal and political questions of utilizing the American litigation system, and particularly its tort theories of liability, to regulate climate change. Attempts to employ the courts as a tool for regulation are exemplified by cases such as Comer v. Murphy Oil, Connecticut v. American Electric Power, Co., and Native Village of Kivalina v. Exxon Mobil Corporation.
There are several papers about the desirability of such litigation, strategies concerning it, and the impact it might have on efforts to bring about national legislation and international cooperation on global warming and related problems.
These include:
Conclusion
Notes
See Also
References and Further Reading
About the Author/s and Reviewer/s
Author: international
Leave a Reply