Muslim Marriage

Muslim Marriage

Note: The information is mostly drawn from two publications which are based on research by local legal experts and activists in the Muslim community: Knowing Our Rights: Women, family, laws and customs in the Muslim world, and
Home Truths: A Global Report on Equality in the Muslim Family.

Written Marriage Contracts & Registration of Marriage

The vast majority of women live in situations where women’s marital rights are not as well protected as men’s. As the more vulnerable party in a marriage, a woman benefits from documentation of the marriage because it increases her chances of being able to access the inherent rights of a wife in a Muslim marriage as well as any rights the bride may have negotiated with the groom in the marriage contract.

With changes in society, earlier mechanisms of social control have broken down: families and communities can no longer bring effective pressure on men who do not respect their wives. Oral promises are nowadays not enough to ensure a smooth marriage. Women who lack marriage documents are even more vulnerable because oral contracts are difficult to enforce: who can prove she was married, when and with what contractual agreements? People move houses and towns, witnesses and the imam who celebrated the marriage are not always easy to trace.

In most Muslim countries, a marriage has to be registered and there are penalties such as light prison sentences and/or fines for failure to register the marriage. For example, in 1974 Bangladesh strengthened the marriage registration laws by passing the Muslim Marriages and Divorces Registration Act. In 2000 in Pakistan, the Federal Shariat Court upheld the registration of marriages as Islamic (Allah Rakha and another vs. Federation of Pakistan and Others PLD 2000 FSC 1). This shows how important marriage registration is in Muslim societies outside Britain. Muslim family laws for example in Bangladesh and Pakistan also regard the person who solemnized the marriage as responsible for registration.

The following are some of the countries whose laws require written marriage contracts and registration of marriage:

Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Gambia (marriages under Muslim laws), Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Morocco, Pakistan, Philippines, Senegal, Sudan, Tunisia, and Turkey.

The Right of an Adult Muslim Woman to Contract her own Marriage

In Tunisia, under Article 9 of 1956 Code du Statut Personnel (Personal Status Code), both the husband and wife have the right to contract their marriage themselves or appoint proxies, and Article 3 regarding validity does not require the consent of the wali. Under Article 25 of the 2004 Moudawana (Morocco’s Muslim family law), a woman of legal majority may conclude her marriage herself, or delegate this power to her father or one of her relatives. In other words, both Morocco and Tunisia’s laws have made wali optional.

The laws that govern Muslims in the following countries do not require a wali at all for an adult Muslim woman getting married: Bangladesh, India, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Senegal, Turkey, Uzbekistan. In Pakistan, the question of whether a Muslim marriage is valid without a wali has often been debated in the courts and the higher courts have consistently over many decades upheld an adult Muslim woman’s right to choice in marriage. Some of the most prominent cases include Mst. Humera Mehmood vs. The State and Others PLD 1999 Lahore 494 and Hafiz Abdul Waheed vs. Miss Asma Jehangir and Another PLD 1997 Lahore 301.

Even in countries where the law requires a wali, there are different interpretations about the wali’s role. For example, in Sudan’s law a wali is called a vakil and his role is simply as an agent whose duty is to convey the woman’s wishes.

In Malaysia, it is now very common for Muslim judges to authorise marriages opposed by the normal wali if the couple moves to another town. Section 13 of Malaysia’s Islamic Family Law (Federal Territories) Act 1984 (which was intended as a model for each of Malaysia’s 13 States) allows dispensation of the wali’s consent in favour of consent by the court if there are valid grounds for dispensation, “after due inquiry in the presence of all parties concerned”. In Azizah vs. Mat (1976) 2 Jurnal Hukum 251, the father of a young woman refused to give his consent to her marriage, wanting her to earn a living first. On her application to the Registrar, he (the Registrar) transferred the marriage guardianship to a wali raja (meaning the court). Her father was allowed to give evidence, and it transpired that his refusal to give consent was based on the fact that he wanted compensation for maintaining her. The consent to the marriage was given by the court.

Most countries do not require a wali if the woman is re-marrying.

The Rights of the Spouses to Add Other Conditions to the Marriage Contract

Muslim marriage is a contract, and therefore the spouses have the right to negotiate conditions to the marriage, as long as they are not contrary to the meaning of marriage (for example, that the spouses will live separately). This right is recognised in the laws of many Muslim countries and communities. See the entry about muslim marriage contracts.

Resources

Further Reading

  • El Fadl, K. A., ‘The Centrality of Shariah to Government and Constitutionalism in Islam’, in Grote, R. and Röder, T. (eds.), Constitutionalism in Islamic Countries: Between Upheaval and Continuity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 35–61
  • El Fadl, K. A., Islam and the Challenge of Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)
  • El Fadl, K. A., ‘Islamic Law and Muslim Minorities’, Islamic Law and Society 1:(2) (1994), 141–87
  • El Fadl, K. A., ‘The Rules of Killing at War: An Inquiry into Classical Sources’, Muslim World 89 (1999), 144–57
  • El Fadl, K. A., Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women (Oxford: One World, 2001)
  • El-Alami, D., and Hinchcliffe, D., Islamic Marriage and Divorce Laws in the Arab World (The Hague: Kluwer, 1996)
  • El-Alami, D., The Marriage Contract in Islamic Law: The Shariah and Personal Status Laws of Egypt and Morocco (London: Graham & Trotman, 1992)
  • El-Azhary Sonbol, A., Women, the Family, and Divorce Laws in Islamic History (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1996)
  • El-Gamal, M. A., ‘An Economic Explication of the Prohibition of Riba in Classical Islamic Jurisprudence’, proceedings of the Third Harvard University Forum on Islamic Finance, 2000 Google Scholar
  • El-Gamal, M. A., Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
  • El-Gamal, M. A., ‘Limits and Dangers of Sharia Arbitrage’, in Ali, N. (ed.), Islamic Finance: Current Legal and Regulatory Issues (Cambridge, MA: Islamic Finance Project, Islamic Legal Studies Program, Harvard University, 2005), pp. 127–31
  • El-Nawawy, M., and Khamis, S., Islam Dot Com: Contemporary Islamic Discourses in Cyberspace (New York: Macmillan, 2009)
  • El-Tahawy, A., ‘The Internet Is the New Mosque: Fatwa at the Click of a Mouse’, Arab Insight: Emerging Social and Legal Trends 2(1) (2008), 11–19
  • Haddad, Y. Y., and Stowasser, B. (eds.), Islamic Law and the Challenges of Modernity (Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 2004)
  • Haddad, Y. Y., and Stowasser, B., ‘Islamic Law and the Challenge of Modernity’, in Haddad, Y. Y. and Stowasser, B. (eds.), Islamic Law and the Challenges of Modernity (Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 2004), pp. 1–17
  • Haeri, S., Law of Desire: Temporary Marriage in Shi’i Iran (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1989)
  • Haikal, M. H., Abu Bakr al-Siddiq (Cairo: Matba’s Masdar Shirka Musahim Misriyya, 1958)
  • Hajjar, L., ‘Domestic Violence and Shari’a: A Comparative Study of Muslim Societies in the Middle East, Africa and Asia’, in Welchman, L. (ed.), Women’s Rights and Islamic Family Law: Perspectives on Reform (London: Zed, 2004), pp. 233–68
  • Hallaq, W., ‘Can the Sharia Be Restored?’, in Haddad, Y. Y. and Stowasser, B. (eds.), Islamic Law and the Challenges of Modernity (Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 2004), pp. 21–53
  • Hallaq, W., ‘From Fatwas to Furu: Growth and Change in Islamic Substantive Law’, Islamic Law and Society 1 (1994), 29–65
  • Hallaq, W., An Introduction to Islamic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)
  • Hallaq, W., Sharia: Theory, Practice, Transformations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)
  • Halliday, F., and Alavi, H. (eds.), State and Ideology in the Middle East and Pakistan (London: Macmillan Educational, 1988)
  • Hamidullah, M., The First Written Constitution in the World, 2nd edn (Lahore: Sheikh Muhammad Ashraf, 1968)
  • Hamidullah, M., Muslim Conduct of State (Lahore: Sh. Muhammad Ashraf, 1977)
  • Hamilton, W., ‘Constitutionalism’, in Seligman, E. and Johnson, A. (eds.), Encylopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 4 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1931), pp. 255–9
  • Hamoudi, H. A., ‘The Death of Islamic Law’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 38 (2010), 293–337
  • Hamoudi, H. A., ‘The Impossible, Highly Desired Islamic Bank’, William & Mary Business Law Review 5 (2014), 105–58
  • Hamoudi, H. A., ‘Jurisprudential Schizophrenia: On Form and Function in Islamic Finance’, Chicago Journal of International Law 7(2) (2007), 605–22
  • Hamoudi, H. A., ‘Repugnancy in the Arab World’, Williamette Law Review 48 (2012), 427–50
  • Hassan, R., ‘An Islamic Perspective’, in Belcher, J. (ed.), Women, Religion and Sexuality (Geneva: WCC, 1990), pp. 93–128
  • Hassan, R., ‘On Human Rights and the Quranic Perspective’, in Swidler, A. (ed.), Human Rights in Religious Traditions (New York: Pilgrim Press, 1982), pp. 51–66
  • Hassan, R., ‘The Role and Responsibilities of Women in the Legal and Ritual Tradition of Islam’, paper presented to the Trialogue of Jewish–Christian–Muslim scholars at the Joseph and Rose Kennedy Institute for Ethics, Washington, DC, 1980
  • Haugestad, A., Reservations to the United Nations Women’s Convention, with special focus on Reservations Submitted by Muslim Countries, Studies in Women’s Law, 39 (Oslo, 1995)
  • Haydar, A., ‘From the Anglo-Muhammadan Law to the Shariah: The Pakistan Experiment’, Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies 10(4) (1987), 33–50
  • Hellum, A., Ali, S. S., and Griffiths, A. (eds.), From Transnational Relations to Transnational Laws: Northern European Law at the Crossroads (London: Ashgate, 2010)
  • Hossain, K., ‘Pluralism and the Law: Evolving Legal Frameworks for Change in Muslim Societies: Some Reflections’, in Soeteman, A. (ed.), Pluralism and Law: Proceedings of the 20th IVR World Congress, Amsterdam, 2001 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2004), pp. 71–76
  • Howard, R., ‘Human Rights and the Search for Community’, Journal of Peace Research 32(1) (1995), 1–8
  • Huq, A., ‘Section 4 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961: A Critic’, Northern University Journal of Law 1 (2010), 7–13
  • Ibn Ishaq, M., Sirat Rasul Allah, translated from Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad: A Translation of Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1955)
  • Shirkat Gah Women’s Resource Centre, ‘Women’s Rights in Muslim Family Law in Pakistan: 45 Years of Recommendations vs. the FSC Judgement’, January 2000 special bulletin, February 2000
  • Siddique, O., Pakistan’s Experience with Formal Law: An Alien Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
  • Siddiqui, N., Partnership in Islamic Banking (Leicester: Islamic Foundation, 1985)
  • Sisler, V., ‘The Internet and the Construction of Islamic Knowledge in Europe’, Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 1(2) (2007), 205–18
  • Skovgaard-Petersen, J., ‘A Typology of State Muftis’, in Haddad, Y. Y. and Stowasser, B. (eds.), Islamic Law and the Challenges of Modernity (Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 2004), pp. 81–98
  • Sonbol, A. A., ‘A Response to Muslim Countries’ Reservations against Full Implementation of CEDAW’, Journal of Women of the Middle East & the Islamic World 8 (2010), 348–67
  • Santos, Sousa, , B. de, ‘Law: A Map of Misreading: Towards a Postmodern Conception of Law’, Journal of Law & Society 14 (1989), 279–302
  • Santos, Sousa, , B. de, Toward a New Common Sense (New York: Routledge, 1995)
  • Stahnke, T., and Blitt, R., The Religion–State Relationship and the Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Comparative Textual Analysis of the Constitutions of Predominantly Muslim Countries (Washington, DC: USCIRF, 2005)
  • Stilt, K. A., ‘Contextualizing Constitutional Islam: The Malaysian Experience’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (2015), 407–33
  • Stilt, K. A., ‘Islam Is the Solution: Constitutional Visions of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’, Texas International Law Journal 46 (2010), 73–108
  • Taha, M. M., The Second Message of Islam (trans. An-Na’im, ) (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1987)
  • Timm, H., ‘The Cultural and Demographic Aspects of the Islamic Financial System and the Potential for Islamic Products in the German Market’, Stralsund University PhD thesis, 2005
  • Tiryakian, E. A., ‘Assessing Multiculturalism Theoretically: E Pluribus Unum, Sic et Non’, in Rex, J. and Singh, G. (eds.), Governance in Multicultural Societies (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 1–18
  • Tucker, J., In the House of the Law: Gender and Islamic Law in Ottoman Syria and Palestine (Berkeley: UC, 1998)
  • Tucker, J., ‘Muftis and Matrimony: Islamic Law and Gender in Ottoman Syria and Palestine’, Islamic Law and Society 1(3) (1994), 265–300
  • Tucker, J., Women, Family, and Gender in Islamic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)

Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *