International Court of Justice Part 11

 

Islamic Law in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice : An Analysis
Clark B. Lombardi
Chicago Journal of International Law
Volume 8, Number 1, Summer 2007 p.85

Whither genocide? The International Court of Justice finally pronounces
William A. Schabas
Journal of Genocide Research
Volume 9, Number 2, 2007 p.183-192

Holding States Accountable for the Ultimate Human Rights Abuse: A Review of the International Court of Justice?s Bosnian Genocide Case
Scott Shackelford
Human Rights Brief
Volume 14, Issue 3, Spring 2007 p.21

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE – WORK IN 2005-2006 – Registry of the Court
Hague Yearbook of International Law
Volume 19, 2006 p.135

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE – CASES BEFORE THE COURT
Hague Yearbook of International Law
Volume 19, 2006

The Conflict Between Argentina and Uruguay Concerning the Installation and Commissioning of Pulp Mills Before the International Court of Justice and MERCOSUR
Pavón Piscitello & Andrés
Heidelberg Journal of International Law
Volume 67, Number 1, 2007 p.159

Sentencing Contempt of Court in International Criminal Justice: An Unforeseen Problem Concerning Sentencing and Penalties
Silvia D’Ascoli
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Volume 5, Number 3, July 2007 p.735-756

Towards Universal Justice – Why Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region Should Embrace the International Criminal Court
Steven Freeland
New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law
Volume 5, Number 1, June 2007 p.49

The 2006 Record of the International Court of Justice
Pieter H.F. Bekker
Chinese Journal of International Law
Volume 6, Number 2, July 2007 p.379-388

The International Court of Justice
Alex Goh & Steven Freeland
Australian International Law Journal
2004 p.47

International Court of Justice
Leiden Journal of International Law
Volume 20, Number 2, June 2007

Captain Bridgeport And The Maze Of ICC Jurisdiction
Lance Phillip Timbreza
Gonzaga Journal of International Law
Volume 10, Issue 3, 2006-2007

The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established with the purpose of ending impunity and ensuring the effective prosecution of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and crimes of aggression. Benjamin B. Ferencz, a former Nuremburg prosecutor has said, “There can be no peace without justice, no justice without law and no meaningful law without a Court to decide what is just and lawful under any given circumstances.”That Court is the International Criminal Court.

Coming Apart At The Seamline-The Oslo Accords And Israel’s Security Barrier: A Missed Opportunity
Seth Benjamin Orkand
Gonzaga Journal of International Law
Volume 10, Issue 3, 2006-2007

In 2004, the International Court of Justice and the Israeli Supreme Court both ruled on the legality of the barrier that Israel is constructing along the ‘seamline’ between Israel and the West Bank. While they differed in their outcomes, both opinions were based on international humanitarian and human rights law, and neither court found it necessary to discuss the obligations that the Israelis and Palestinians had made in signing the Oslo Accords. This paper examines several possible explanations for this omission, ultimately concluding that the Oslo Accords were binding on the parties as subjects of international law, and they continued to remain in force at the time of the court decisions.

 

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court.