{"id":467,"date":"2012-06-24T21:52:00","date_gmt":"2012-06-25T04:52:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tax-society.org\/?p=467"},"modified":"2012-06-24T21:52:00","modified_gmt":"2012-06-25T04:52:00","slug":"international-commercial-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/international-commercial-law\/","title":{"rendered":"International Commercial Law"},"content":{"rendered":"

International Commercial law<\/a> <\/h1>\n

See also Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Treaty,<\/p>\n

Legislation:<\/p>\n

United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods<\/a>
\nBerne Union for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Property ( Berne Convention<\/a> )
\nConvention for the Protection of Industrial Property<\/p>\n

\n

US Main Decisions:<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

1.\t Royal and Sun Alliance Ins. Co. v. Century Int’l Arms
\n2.\t Malaysia Int’l Shipping Co. v. Sinochem Int’l Co.
\n3.\t Goss Int’l v. Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho
\n4.\t Altadis v. Sea Star Line
\n5.\t Kreimerman v. Casa Veerkamp
\n6.\t Magellan International Corporation v. Salzgitter Hand
\n7.\t Asante Technologies Inc v. PMC-Sierra Inc
\n8.\t Ajax Tool Works Inc v. Can-Eng Mfg Ltd
\n9.\t Attorneys Trust v. Videotape Computer Products, Inc..
\n10.\t Delchi Carrier S.p.A. v. Rotorex Corp. (1995)
\n11.\tRecord – Aldana v. Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.
\n12.\tTreaty – Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreig
\n13.\t International Thunderbird Gaming Corp v. United Mexic
\n14.\t Eli Lilly do Brasil Ltd. v. Federal Express Corp
\n15.\t Microsoft Corp v. AT
\n16.\t Gerdau Ameristeel Corp. v. United States
\n17.\t Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel, Inc
\n18.\t La Resolana Architects, PA v. Clay Realtors Angel Fir
\n19.\t Leicester v. Warner Brothers
\n20.\t Chicago Prime Packers, Inc. v. Northam Food Trading C
\n21.\t Zapata Hermanos Sucesores, S.A. v. Hearthside Baking
\n22.\t Chateau des Charmes Wines Ltd. v. Sabate USA Inc.
\n23.\t BP Oil Intern., Ltd. v. Empresa Estatal Petoleos de E
\n24.\t Beijing Metals
\n25.\t Schmitz-Werke Gmbh Co. v. Rockland Industries, Inc.
\n26.\t Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy
\n27.\t Capitol Records, Inc. v. Naxos Records, Inc.
\n28.\t Phillips v. Pembroke Real Estate Inc.
\n29.\t Voda, M.D. v. Cordis Corporation
\n30.\t In re Rath
\n31.\t International Cafe, S.A.L. v. Hard Rock Cafe Internat
\n32.\t Grupo Gigante SA De CV v. Dallo
\n33.\t BP Chemicals Ltd. v. Jiangsu Sopo Corporation
\n34.\t Empressa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp.<\/p>\n

\n

Conclusion<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Notes<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

See Also<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

References and Further Reading<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

About the Author\/s and Reviewer\/s<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Author: international<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mentioned in these Entries<\/h3>\n

Arbitration resources<\/a>, Berne Convention<\/a>, Commercial law<\/a>, International Commercial Arbitration<\/a>, International Family Law<\/a>, International Law of Procedure<\/a>, International Trade Law Resources<\/a>, International Trade and Commercial Relations resources<\/a>, International business arbitration<\/a>, International economic law sources<\/a>, International law topics<\/a>, International legal sources of information<\/a>, International trade law Part 5<\/a>, Law Journals ranking worldwide<\/a>, Law global results of the 200 top searches in Google 2<\/a>, Law global results of the 200 top searches in Google 5<\/a>, Law global results of the 200 top searches in Google<\/a>, Legal guides<\/a>, List of International Law Online Journals<\/a>, List of international law publications in english<\/a>, Private International Law<\/a>, Trade law Part 20<\/a>, Trade law Part 21<\/a>, Trade law3<\/a>, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods<\/a>. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

International Commercial law See also Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Treaty, Legislation: United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods Berne Union for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Property ( Berne Convention ) Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property US Main Decisions: 1. Royal and Sun […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,124,78,5],"tags":[125,73],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/467"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/467\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}