{"id":4164,"date":"2012-09-11T09:53:15","date_gmt":"2012-09-11T16:53:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sociedades-limitadas-colombia.com\/?p=4164"},"modified":"2012-09-11T09:53:15","modified_gmt":"2012-09-11T16:53:15","slug":"international-copyright-part-8","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/international-copyright-part-8\/","title":{"rendered":"International copyright Part 8"},"content":{"rendered":"

International copyright<\/a> Part 8<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

60<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

An International-Comparative Perspective on Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing and Third Party Liability in Copyright Law: Framing the Past, Present, and Next Generations’ Questions
\nGuy Pessach
\nVanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
\nVolume 40, Number 1, January 2007 p.87 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

61<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Harmonization of International copyright<\/a> Protection in the Internet Age
\nChristian A. Camarce
\nPacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal
\nVolume 19, Number 2, 2007 p.435 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

62<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

HOLLYWOOD IS COMING! COPYRIGHT AND FILM INDUSTRY ISSUES REGARDING INTERNATIONAL FILM CO-PRODUCTIONS INVOLVING INDIA
\nTimm Neu
\nSan Diego International Law Journal
\nVolume 8, Number 1, Fall 2006 p.123 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

63<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

International Copyright Law And Litigation: A Mechanism For Improvement
\nRoberto Garza Barbosa
\nMarquette Intellectual Property Law Review
\nVolume 11, Number 1, Winter 2007 p.77 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

64<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

International Patent Law is Obsolete and Copyright is Obsolete
\nRoger Cullis
\nJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
\nVolume 1, Number 13, December 2006 p.867-868 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

65<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Fixing the Three-step Test
\nKAMIEL J. KOELMAN
\nEuropean Intellectual Property Review
\nVolume 28, Issue 8, August 2006 p.407 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The three-step test is at the core of copyright law. All exemptions to copyright and the neighboring rights have to comply with this test. It takes centre stage in international copyright law. Additionally, some countries inserted the test in their copyright acts. In others, judges apply the three-step test if they are in doubt whether an activity may be exempted. However, the three-step test is seriously flawed and not suited for application by the courts. This contribution sets out the problem and proposes a possible solution.<\/p>\n

\n

66<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Beyond an Oil Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary Artist
\nMolly Anne Torsen
\nArt, Antiquity and Law
\nVolume 11, Issue 1, January 2006 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

67<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Passing the Global Test: DMCA \u00a7 1201 as an International Model for Transitioning Copyright Law Into the Digital Age
\nChris Kruger
\nJournal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.
\nVolume 53, Numbers 3-4, Spring 2006-Summer 2006 p.447 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

68<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

A Historical Approach to the Current Copyright Law in Spain
\nJULIAN RODRIGUEZ PARDO
\nEuropean Intellectual Property Review
\nVolume 28, Issue 7, July 2006 p.389 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Since the first Spanish copyright privileges in the 15th century to the current process of update of the Spanish Copyright Act of 1996, the Intellectual Property system of Spain has evolved from specific national remarks to convergence with the EU law as well as International Treaties<\/a> law. This article reviews the main changes in order to understand the current configuration of the Spanish copyright system.<\/p>\n

\n

69<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Hitchcock’s “Rear Window”& International Copyright Law: An Examination of Stewart v. Abend & Its Affect on International Copyright Renewal and Exploitation
\nSeth M. Goldstein
\nCardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law
\nVolume 14, Number 1, Spring 2006 p.247 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

70<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Moral Rights Protection in the United States and the Effect of the Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005 on U.S. International Obligations
\nBrandi L. Holland
\nVanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
\nVolume 39, Number 1, January 2006 p.217 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

71<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Culture and the Digital Copyright Chimera: Assessing the International Regulatory System of the Music Industry in Relation to Cultural Diversity
\nJohnlee Scelba Curtis
\nInternational Journal of Cultural Property
\nVolume 13, Issue 1, February 2006 p.59-97 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

72<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

PASSING THE GLOBAL TEST: DMCA \u00a71201 AS AN INTERNATIONAL MODEL FOR TRANSITIONING COPYRIGHT LAW INTO THE DIGITAL AGE
\nChristopher D. Kruger
\nHouston Journal of International Law
\nVolume 28, Number 1, Spring 2006 p.281 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

73<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary Artist
\nMolly Ann Torsen
\nSCRIPTed: a Journal of Law, Technology & Society
\nVolume 3, Issue 1, March 2006 p.33-58 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Current copyright laws in all jurisdictions are lacking explicit provisions for protecting many types of contemporary art. It remains unclear to what extent ideas should be copyrightable as art, if at all; or whether an artwork’s commercial nature provides a decisive factor regarding appropriation. Certain situations seem plainly inappropriate, such as artists needing to seek legal counsel in conjunction with creating their artwork: inappropriate in its financial extravagance and in its inevitable curb on creativity. As such, it is incumbent upon courts and legislatures to analyze the issue and to provide guidance. It is the author’s finding that strong moral rights and a vibrant public domain are not necessarily at odds with each other, especially when parties are open to communication. Laws operate to provide structure when parties do not make other arrangements amongst themselves; contracts between artists and galleries, artists and publishers, even artists and other artists may provide the highest degree of satisfaction for specific parties to a specific situation. Not surprisingly, parties with legal or business interests in art and parties with artistic interests in art would communicate better if they understood each other’s situations. Hopefully the issues will continue to be the focus of some thought on all platforms such that informed legal decisions can be made and artists can pursue and protect their creative productions, no matter their format.<\/p>\n

\n

74<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The Business Exemption of \u00a7 110(5) of the Copyright Act Violates International Treaty Obligations under Trips: Will Congress Honor its Commitments?
\nCharles Leininger
\nJournal of the National Association of Administrative law<\/a> Judiciary
\nVolume 25, Number 2, Fall 2005 p.611 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

75<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Copyright and Free Speech: Comparative and International Analyses
\nEuropean Intellectual Property Review
\nVolume 27, Issue 11, November 2005 p.440 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

76<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Are International Copyright Laws Keeping Up with the Internet?
\nLisa Egan
\nIntellectual Property Forum
\nIssue 62, September 2005 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

77<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

SEALAND HO! MUSIC PIRATES, DATA HAVENS, AND THE FUTURE OF INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAW
\nKevin Fayle
\nHastings International and Comparative Law Review
\nVolume 28, Number 2, Winter 2005 p.247 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Conclusion<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Notes<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

See Also<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

References and Further Reading<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

About the Author\/s and Reviewer\/s<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Author: international<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mentioned in these Entries<\/h3>\n

Administrative law<\/a>, International copyright<\/a>, Treaties<\/a>. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

International copyright Part 8   60 An International-Comparative Perspective on Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing and Third Party Liability in Copyright Law: Framing the Past, Present, and Next Generations’ Questions Guy Pessach Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Volume 40, Number 1, January 2007 p.87 LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW 61 Harmonization of International copyright Protection in the Internet […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[101,124,5],"tags":[125],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4164"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4164\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}