{"id":4099,"date":"2012-09-11T07:53:18","date_gmt":"2012-09-11T14:53:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sociedades-limitadas-colombia.com\/?p=4036"},"modified":"2012-09-11T07:53:18","modified_gmt":"2012-09-11T14:53:18","slug":"european-union-law-part-14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/european-union-law-part-14\/","title":{"rendered":"European Union law Part 14"},"content":{"rendered":"

European Union law<\/a> Part 14<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

201<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Insider Trading Regulations in the Context of the Principle of ‘ Rule of law<\/a> ‘: The United States and the European Union Perspective
\nAdam (Adomas) Siudika
\nEuropean Journal of Law Reform
\nVolume 9, Issue 1, 2007 p.91-111 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

202<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Environmental Law In The European Union: New Approach For Enforcement
\nMolly Elizabeth Hall
\nTulane Environmental Law Journal
\nVolume 20, Issue 2, Summer 2007 p.277 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

203<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Sexual Harassment Law in the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union: Discriminatory Wrongs and Dignitary Harms
\nLinda Clarke
\n Common law<\/a> World Review
\nVolume 36, Number 2, June 2007 p.79 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

204<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The European Union and WTO law: a nexus of reactive, coactive, and proactive approaches
\nANTONIS ANTONIADIS
\nWorld Trade Review
\nVolume 6, Issue 1, March 2007 p.45-87 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

205<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Distribution Law In The European Union
\nPaul H. Vishny
\nALI-ABA Business Law Course Materials Journal
\nVolume 31, Number 3, June 2007 p.5 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Distribution law in the EU is governed by a complex web of laws and regulations issued by the European Union. Here are the basic rules under which your clients will have to operate if they wish to sell products virtually anywhere in Europe.<\/p>\n

\n

206<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The European Union and the Religious Dimensions of Law
\nJulian Rivers
\nEcclesiastical Law Journal
\nVolume 9, Issue 2, May 2007 p.221-222 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

207<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The Future of Criminal Law within the European Union – Union Law or Community Law Competence?
\nVerena Murschetz
\nVictoria University of Wellington Law Review
\nVolume 38, Number 1, March 2007 p.145 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

208<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

E-Contract Formation: U.S. and EU Perspective
\nSylvia Mercado Kierkegaard
\nWashington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
\nVolume 3, Issue 3, Winter 2007 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

3 Shidler J. L. Com. & Tech. 12 (2007) – The United States (\u201cU.S.\u201d ) and the European Union (\u201cEU\u201d ) offer contrasting approaches to contract formation in Cyberspace. Two foci can be identified with EU law: (1) consumer protection and (2) market harmonisation. The American approach, however, is characterized by self-regulation and economic rationale. This Article examines and compares the EU and U.S. regulatory approaches to electronic contracting.<\/p>\n

\n

209<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

European Union Food Law Update
\nNicole Coutrelis
\nJournal of Food Law and Policy
\nVolume 2, Number 1, Spring 2006 p.121 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

210<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Outsider or frontrunner? Recent developments under international and European law on the status of the European Union in International Organizations<\/a> and treaty bodies
\nF. Hoffmeister
\nCommon Market Law Review
\nVolume 44, Number 1, February 2007 p.41-68 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

211<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Citizenship Law – No Longer Exclusive National Competence Towards Individual European Union Membership Based on Domicile?
\nHedvig Lokrantz Bernitz
\nSwedish Studies in European Law
\nVolume 1, 2006 p.191 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

212<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Current Developments: European Union law<\/a>
\nInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly
\nVolume 56, Number 2, April 2007 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

213<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Criminal Enforcement of Environmental Law in the European Union. Edited by MICHAEL FAURE AND G\u00c3\u00a0\u0153NTER HEINE
\nOda F. Essens
\nJournal of Environmental Law
\nVolume 19, Number 1, 2007 p.147-149 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

214<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Philosophy, Trade, and Aids: Current Failures to Obtain a Substantive Patent Law Treaty
\nKristen Riemenschneider
\nVirginia Journal of Law & Technology
\nVolume 11, Issue 3, Summer 2006 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

11 Va. J.L. & Tech. 5 (2006) – Intellectual property rights (IPRs) are increasingly important to international trade. Developed countries, such as the United States, Japan, and the members of the European Union (EU), have comprehensive IPR schemes; by contrast, many developing countries do not grant IPRs or have adopted IPR regimes that tend to give fewer rights to the holders. This disparate treatment of IPRs gave rise to a thriving counterfeit and Piracy<\/a> trade in the 1980s, which, in turn, prompted the developed countries to seek global harmonization of IPR regimes through a Substantive Patent Law Treaty (SPLT). Thus far, the developed countries have been unsuccessful. This paper addresses the developed countries’ current failures to achieve a SPLT, and posits that this failure arises from the developed countries’ failure to address three issues developing countries’ philosophies regarding the proper extent of IPRs, the developed countries’ previous use of trade leverage, and the developed countries’ responses to the current AIDS epidemic and the developing countries ability to band together in an unprecedented manner.<\/p>\n

\n

215<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The State of Gender Equality Law in the European Union
\nAnnick Masselot
\nEuropean Law Journal
\nVolume 13, Issue 2, March 2007 p.152-168 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Conclusion<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Notes<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

See Also<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

References and Further Reading<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

About the Author\/s and Reviewer\/s<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Author: international<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mentioned in these Entries<\/h3>\n

Common law<\/a>, European Union law<\/a>, International Organizations<\/a>, Piracy<\/a>, Rule of law<\/a>. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

European Union law Part 14   201 Insider Trading Regulations in the Context of the Principle of ‘ Rule of law ‘: The United States and the European Union Perspective Adam (Adomas) Siudika European Journal of Law Reform Volume 9, Issue 1, 2007 p.91-111 LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW 202 Environmental Law In The European […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[108,101,5],"tags":[481],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4099"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4099"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4099\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}