{"id":4086,"date":"2012-09-11T07:30:15","date_gmt":"2012-09-11T14:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sociedades-limitadas-colombia.com\/?p=3994"},"modified":"2012-09-11T07:30:15","modified_gmt":"2012-09-11T14:30:15","slug":"european-union-law-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/european-union-law-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"European Union law Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"

European Union law<\/a> Part 1<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

1<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

European Union law<\/a>
\nInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly
\nVolume 60, Number 2, April 2011 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

2<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

European Union Food Law Update
\nEmilie H. Leibovitch
\nJournal of Food Law and Policy
\nVolume 6, Number 2, Fall 2010 p.339 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

3<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Limiting the IPRs of Pharmaceutical Companies through EU Competition Law: The First Crack in the Wall
\nDimitris Xenos
\nSCRIPTed: a Journal of Law, Technology & Society
\nVolume 8, Issue 1, 2011 p.93-98 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The exclusivity granted to pharmaceutical companies through intellectual property rights (IPRs) may in certain circumstances run counter to the main objectives for which these rights are intended. EU competition law has stepped in to correct systemic failures that have adversely affected the competitiveness of the sector and the public interest of individuals in access to improved and affordable medicines. In the case of AstraZeneca v Commission, the General Court of the European Union found, for the first time, that a pharmaceutical company had abused its dominant position by (mis)using regulatory patent procedures to eliminate or restrict the market entry of competitors of generic medicines. To understand the way by which EU competition law intersects with IPRs and safeguards (patent regulations) requires an appreciation of the tensions (Part I) that underlie the expansive application of competition rules in the pharmaceutical sector (Parts II, III) as well as of the new policies that have emerged (Part IV).<\/p>\n

\n

4<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The Commission’s 2010 Green Paper on European Contract Law: Reflections on Union Competence in Light of the Proposed Options
\nKathleen Gutman
\nEuropean Review of Contract Law
\nVolume 7, Issue 2, February 2011 p.151 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

5<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The weakness of strong policies and the strength of weak policies: Law, experimentalist governance, and supporting coalitions in European Union health care policy
\nScott L. Greer
\nRegulation & Governance
\nVolume 5, Issue 2, June 2011 p.187-203 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

6<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union
\nUlrike Brandl
\nInternational Journal of Refugee Law
\nVolume 23, Number 2, July 2011 p.428-431 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

7<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Age Determination of Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Minors in the European Union: A Health Law Perspective
\nAbbing, Henriette D.C. Roscam
\nEuropean Journal of Health Law
\nVolume 18, Number 1, 2011 p.11-25 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

8<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

French supreme courts and European Union law: Between historical compromise and accepted loyalty
\nRostane Mehdi
\nCommon Market Law Review
\nVolume 48, Number 2, 2011 p.439-473 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

9<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The Interrelation between Rights and Duties in EU Law: Reflections on the State of Liability Law in the Multilevel Governance System of the Union: Is There a Need for a More Coherent Approach in European Private Law?
\nNorbert Reich
\nYearbook of European Law
\nVolume 29, 2010 p.112-163 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

10<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Supremacy, direct effect and consistent interpretation-tools for an effective and uniform application of European Union law?
\nTadeusz Ereci?ski
\nERA Forum
\nVolume 11, Number 4, February 2011 p.531-536 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

11<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Case Law of the European Union Courts, Leading Judgments 15 June-30 September 2010
\nJohanna Engstr\u00c3\u00bcm, Laviero Buono, Kassiani Christodoulou, Florence Hartmann-Vareilles and Jean-Claude Alexandre Ho, et al.
\nERA Forum
\nVolume 11, Number 4, February 2011 p.621-645 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

12<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Case Law of the European Union Courts, Leading Judgments 1 December-15 June 2010
\nJohanna Engstr\u00c3\u00bcm, Jean-Claude Alexandre Ho, Malte Beyer-Katzenberger, Kassiani Christodoulou and Angelika Fuchs, et al.
\nERA Forum
\nVolume 11, Number 3, November 2010 p.459-516 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

13<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Federalism in the European Union<\/a> and the United States: Subsidiarity, Private Law, and the Conflict of Laws
\nAlex Mills
\nUniversity of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law
\nVolume 32, Number 2, Winter 2010 p.369 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Conclusion<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Notes<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

See Also<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

References and Further Reading<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

About the Author\/s and Reviewer\/s<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Author: international<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mentioned in these Entries<\/h3>\n

1000 Top law pages in Wikipedia in may 2012<\/a>, 1500 Top law pages in Wikipedia in may 2012<\/a>, Constitutional Text: Austria 1920, Admended 2004<\/a>, European Union law Part 2<\/a>, European Union law Part 20<\/a>, European Union law Part 21<\/a>, European Union law Part 22<\/a>, European Union law Part 23<\/a>, European Union law Part 24<\/a>, European Union law Part 25<\/a>, European Union law Part 26<\/a>, European Union law Part 27<\/a>, European Union law Part 28<\/a>, European Union law Part 29<\/a>, European Union law Part 3<\/a>, European Union law Part 30<\/a>, European Union law Part 31 2<\/a>, European Union law Part 31<\/a>, European Union law Part 4<\/a>, European Union law Part 5<\/a>, European Union law Part 6<\/a>, European Union law Part 7<\/a>, European Union law Part 8<\/a>, European Union law Part 9<\/a>, European Union law<\/a>, European Union law0<\/a>, European Union law1<\/a>, European Union law2<\/a>, European Union law3<\/a>, European Union law4<\/a>, European Union law5<\/a>, European Union law6<\/a>, European Union law7<\/a>, European Union law8<\/a>, European Union law9<\/a>, Federalism in the European Union<\/a>, International commercial arbitration<\/a>, International law popular books<\/a>, Law Guides list<\/a>, Law global results of the 200 top searches in Google 2<\/a>, Law global results of the 200 top searches in Google 4<\/a>, Law global results of the 200 top searches in Google<\/a>, Legal subjects<\/a>, List of International Business Law Selected Cases, by Subject<\/a>, List of Legal Encyclopedias<\/a>, List of international public law topics<\/a>, Mid law pages in Wikipedia in may 2012 by importance<\/a>, Moys Classification and Thesaurus for Legal Materials<\/a>, Trade law Part 54<\/a>. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

European Union law Part 1   1 European Union law International and Comparative Law Quarterly Volume 60, Number 2, April 2011 LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW 2 European Union Food Law Update Emilie H. Leibovitch Journal of Food Law and Policy Volume 6, Number 2, Fall 2010 p.339 LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW 3 Limiting […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[108,101,5],"tags":[481],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4086"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4086"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4086\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4086"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4086"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4086"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}