{"id":4047,"date":"2012-09-10T20:31:25","date_gmt":"2012-09-11T03:31:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sociedades-limitadas-colombia.com\/?p=3843"},"modified":"2012-09-10T20:31:25","modified_gmt":"2012-09-11T03:31:25","slug":"trade-law-part-67","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/trade-law-part-67\/","title":{"rendered":"Trade law Part 67"},"content":{"rendered":"

Trade law<\/a> Part 67<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

709<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Panel #1: The World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in Context: Economics, Politics, Law and Health
\nWisconsin International Law Journal
\nVolume 20, Number 3, Fall 2002 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

710<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

DON QUIXOTE’S ADVICE RINGS TRUE: THIS CHICKEN SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. REVIEWING UNITED STATES LAW OF TRADE AND INVESTMENT(BORIS KOZOLCHYK & JOHN F. MOLLOY EDS., 2000)
\nAna Maria Merico-Stephens
\nArizona Journal of International and Comparative Law
\nVolume 19, Number 3, Fall 2002 p.931 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

United States Law of Trade and Investment is a welcome addition to the growing collection of scholarship written specifically to increase cross-cultural understandings of dissimilar legal traditions. In forty-four chapters, spread across four volumes, the editors and authors summarize entire fields of law. This work is not a treatise, but rather an introduction and survey of several fields of law that have an impact on trade and investment. The editing choices reflect a focused understanding of the needs of its potential audience: academics and practitioners unfamiliar with the Common law<\/a> tradition or the American laws of trade and investment. Kozolchyk and Molloy’s four-volume introduction to the United States Law of Trade and Investment and its forthcoming Spanish translation are timely, and deserve the recognition of the academic community and the interest of the civilian practitioner.<\/p>\n

\n

711<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Hans van Houtte, The Law of International Trade
\nStanimir A. Alexandrov
\nICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal
\nVolume 17, Number 2, Fall 2002 p.504 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

712<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

TRADE DRESS LAW: THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN PRODUCT DESIGN AND PRODUCT PACKAGING
\nJeff Resnick
\nWhittier Law Review
\nVolume 24, Number 1, Fall 2002 p.253 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

713<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

PANEL ISSUE – THE PROSPECTIVE ROLE OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
\nNew York University Journal of International Law and Politics
\nVolume 35, Number 1, Fall 2002 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

714<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

The ABCs and NTBs of GMOs: The Great European Union-United States Trade Debate-Do European Restrictions on the Trade of Genetically Modified Organisms Violate International trade law<\/a> ?
\nSarah Lively
\nNorthwestern Journal of International Law & Business
\nVolume 23, Number 1, Fall 2002 p.239 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

715<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

China-WTO: Rule of law<\/a> Through the Opening to International Trade?
\nLe\u00c3\u00a0\u00afla CHOUKROUNE
\nInternational Business Law Journal
\nNumber 6, 2002 p.655 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

716<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Mergers and Acquisitions: Antitrust Limitations on Conduct Before Closing
\nM. Howard Morse
\nBusiness Lawyer
\nVolume 57, Number 4, August 2002 p.1463 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

United States antitrust authorities have brought a number of enforcement actions in recent years challenging conduct of firms proposing mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures. These cases have attacked covenants restricting activities pending closing of proposed transactions as well as initial efforts to integrate operations and even exchanges of information among parties proposing to merge. The government is proceeding on theories that such conduct is illegal “gun-jumping”or “price-fixing,”which is unlawful under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, the Sherman Act, or the Federal Trade Commission Act. This Article outlines the legal framework for analyzing pre-closing conduct by parties proposing a transaction, describes the conduct that has led firms into trouble in recent enforcement actions, and provides practical guidelines as to what is lawful and unlawful in this confusing area of the law.<\/p>\n

\n

717<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Compensability for Psychological Injuries Arising From Breach of Contract, Deceit and Contravention of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and Fair Trading Acts: The Need for Rationalisation and Consistency in the Law: Aldersea v Public Transport Corporation [2001] 3 VR 499; [2001] VSC 169
\nIan Freckelton
\nPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
\nVolume 9, Issue 1, June 2002 p.109-113 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

718<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

A Pothole on the Road to Recovery: Reliance and Private Class Actions Under Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law
\nSeth William Goren
\nPenn State law<\/a> Review
\nVolume 107, Number 1, Summer 2002 p.1 <\/p>\n

\n

LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Conclusion<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Notes<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

See Also<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

References and Further Reading<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

About the Author\/s and Reviewer\/s<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Author: international<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mentioned in these Entries<\/h3>\n

Common law<\/a>, International trade law<\/a>, Rule of law<\/a>, State law<\/a>, Trade law<\/a>. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Trade law Part 67   709 Panel #1: The World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in Context: Economics, Politics, Law and Health Wisconsin International Law Journal Volume 20, Number 3, Fall 2002 LAW JOURNAL \/ LAW REVIEW 710 DON QUIXOTE’S ADVICE RINGS TRUE: THIS CHICKEN SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. REVIEWING […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[101,5,102],"tags":[164],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4047"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4047\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}