This list provides some of the most importan cases covered by the Encyclopedia. There are thousands of cases in the Encyclopedia, but these are, probably, among the more important the Encyclopedia has covered. In alphabetical order:<\/p>\n
Abrams v. United States Author: international<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n Education<\/a>, List of International Business Law Landmark Cases<\/a>. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" List of some of the main court decisions in the Wiki Encyclopedia This list provides some of the most importan cases covered by the Encyclopedia. There are thousands of cases in the Encyclopedia, but these are, probably, among the more important the Encyclopedia has covered. In alphabetical order: Abrams v. United States Adamson v. California […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,110,66,5],"tags":[30,43,152],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2836"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2836"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2836\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawin.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nAdamson v. California
\nApodaca v. Oregon
\nArgersinger v. Hamlin
\nArizona v. Evans
\nArizona v. Fulminante
\nArizona v. Gant
\nAT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc.
\nAT&T Corporation v. Hulteen
\nAT&T Mobility v. Concepcion
\nAtwater v. City of Lago Vista
\nBaker v. Carr
\nBarron v. Mayor of Baltimore
\nBatson v. Kentucky
\nBerman v. Parker
\nBlakely v. Washington
\nBolling v. Sharpe
\nBowers v. Hardwick
\nBradwell v. Illinois
\nBrandenburg v. Ohio
\nBrown v. Board of Education<\/a>
\nBuckley v. Valeo
\nBush v. Gore
\nCalifornia v. Hodari D.
\nChimel v. California
\nCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission
\nClinton v. Jones
\nCollin v. Smith
\nCounty of Riverside v. McLaughlin
\nDartmouth College v. Woodward
\nDaubert v. Merrell Dow
\nDickerson v. United States
\nDistrict of Columbia v. Heller
\nDred Scott v. Sandford
\nDuncan v. Louisiana
\nEisenstadt v. Baird
\nEmployment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith
\nEngel v. Vitale
\nEscobedo v. United States
\nEverson v. Board of Education<\/a>
\nFay v. Noia
\nFletcher v. Peck
\nFrontiero v. Richardson
\nFurman v. Georgia
\nGannett Co. v. Depasquale In re Gault
\nGibbons v. Ogden
\nGideon v. Wainwright
\nGitlow v. New York
\nGraham v. Connor
\nGreen v. New Kent County School Board
\nGregg v. Georgia
\nGriggs v. Duke Power Company
\nGriswold v. Connecticut
\nHamdi v. Rumsfeld
\nHammer v. Dagenhart
\nHarmelin v. Michigan
\nHerrera v. Collins
\nHerring v. United States
\nHudson v. McMillian
\nHurtado v. People of California
\nIllinois v. Gates
\nIllinois v. Wardlow
\nKatz v. United States
\nKorematsu v. United States
\nKyllo v. United States
\nLawrence v. Texas
\nLegal Services Corp. v. Velazquez GA
\nLemon v. Kurtzman
\nLiebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants
\nLochner v. New York
\nLoving v. Virginia
\nMapp v. Ohio
\nMarbury v. Madison
\nMaryland v. Wilson
\nMassiah v. United States
\nMcCleskey v. Kemp
\nMcCulloch v. Maryland
\nMedell\u00c3\u00a0\u00adn v. Texas
\nMichigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
\nMinnick v. Mississippi
\nMinor v. Happersett
\nMiranda v. Arizona
\nMuller v. Oregon
\nNational Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab
\nNebraska Press Association v. Stuart
\nNew Jersey v. Dharun Ravi
\nNew Jersey v. T. L. O.
\nNew York Times Co. v. Sullivan
\nNew York v. Belton
\nNew York v. Burger
\nNew York v. Harris
\nO’Brien v. United States
\nOklahoma City v. Dowell
\nPalko v. Connecticut
\nPayton v. New York
\nPearson v. Callahan
\nPlanned Parenthood v. Casey
\nPlessy v. Ferguson
\nPlyler v. Doe
\nPowell v. Alabama
\nR.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
\nRegents of the University of California v. Bakke
\nReynolds v. Sims
\nRhode Island v. Innis
\nRichmond Newspapers v.Virginia
\nRing v. Arizona
\nRobinson v. California
\nRoe v. Wade
\nRomer v. Evans
\nRoper v. Simmons
\nRummel v. Estelle
\nSan Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
\nSchenck v. U.S.
\nSchenck v. United States
\nSchmerber v. California
\nSchneckloth v. Bustamonte
\nScott v. Illinois
\nShapiro v. Thompson
\nShaw v. Reno
\nShelley v. Kraemer
\nSolem v. Helm
\nSwann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
\nTennessee v. Garner
\nTerry v. Ohio
\nTexas v. Johnson
\nTinker v. Des Moines Independent Community
\nTinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
\nUnited States v. Dennis
\nUnited States v. Nixon
\nUnited States v. Salerno
\nUnited Steelworkers v. Weber
\nVernonia School District v. Action
\nWallace v. Jaffree
\nWarden v. Hayden
\nWeeks v. United States
\nWest Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
\nWhren v. United States
\nWickard v. Filburn
\nWolf v. People of Colorado
\nWorcester v. Georgia
\nZorach v. Clauson<\/p>\nConclusion<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
Notes<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
See Also<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
References and Further Reading<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
About the Author\/s and Reviewer\/s<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
Mentioned in these Entries<\/h3>\n