Sovereign Debt Litigation

Further Reading

• Adams P (1991) Odious debts. Corruption and the third world environmental legacy. Earthscan, London/TorontoGoogle Scholar
• Ago R (1991) “Binding” advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice. AJIL 85:439–451Google Scholar
• Akehurst M (1972–1973) Jurisdiction in international law. BYIL 46:145–257Google Scholar
• Alagherii Dantis (MCMXX) De Monarchia (first published 1559). In aedibus Leonis S Olschki, GebennaeGoogle Scholar
• Allen EW (1933) The position of foreign states before national courts. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Ambrose S (2005) Social movements and the politics of debt cancellation. Chi J Int’l L 6:267–285Google Scholar
• American Institute of International Law (1965) Restatement of the law (second): the foreign relations law of the United States. American Law Institute, St PaulGoogle Scholar
• American Law Institute (1971) Restatement of the law (second): the conflict of laws. American Law Institute, St PaulGoogle Scholar
• American Institute of International Law (1987) Restatement of the law (third): the foreign relations of the United States. American Law Institute, St PaulGoogle Scholar
• Andreades A (1924) Les contrôles financiers internationaux. Recueil des Courses 5:1–108Google Scholar
• Anzilotti D (1913) Sugli effetti dell’inadempienza di obbligazioni internazionali aventi per oggetto una somma di danaro. RDI 54–67Google Scholar
• Anzilotti D (1928) Corso di diritto internazionale, vol I, 3a ediz. Athenaeum, RomaGoogle Scholar
• Aurelii Augustini (1971) Epistola 153 Macedonio (first published 1493; ed by Carrozzi L). Città Nuova, RomaGoogle Scholar
• Bainbridge S (1986) Comity and sovereign debt litigation: a bankruptcy analogy. Md J Int’l L & Trade 10:1–54Google Scholar
• Baker (Sir) S (1878) Halleck’s international law. C Kegan Paul & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Bankas EK (2005) The state immunity controversy in international law. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Bassiouni MC (1983) The penal characteristics of conventional criminal law. Case W Res J Int’l L 15:27–37Google Scholar
• Berger KP (1993) International economic arbitration. Kluwer, Deventer/BostonGoogle Scholar
• Bhandari JS (1990) International debt litigation in United States Courts. GYIL 33:383–421Google Scholar
• Bianchi A (1995) L’applicazione extraterritoriale dei controlli all’esportazione. Cedam, PadovaGoogle Scholar
• Bianchi A (2004) Dismantling the wall: the ICJ’s advisory opinion and its likely impact on international law. GYIL 33:343–391Google Scholar
• Bickel AM (1949) The doctrine of forum non conveniens as applied in the federal courts in matters of admiralty: an object lesson in uncontrolled discretion. Cornell L Q 35:12–47Google Scholar
• Bjorklund AK (2008) Emergency exceptions: state of necessity and force majeure. In: Muchlinski P, Ortino F, Schreuer C (eds) International investment law. OUP, Oxford, pp 459–523Google Scholar
• Blackstone (Sir) W (MDCCLXXXIII) Commentaries upon the laws of England (first published 1765–1769). W Strahan and T Cadell, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Blair P (1929) The doctrine of forum non conveniens in Anglo-American law. Colum L Rev 29:1–34Google Scholar
• Blair WB (1998) The legal status of central bank investment under English law. Cam L J 57:375–390Google Scholar
• Bohoslavky J-P, Opgenhaffen V (2010) The past and present of corporate complicity: financing the Argentinean dictatorship. Harv Hum Rts J 23:157–203Google Scholar
• Bonafè BI (2006) State immunity and the protection of private investors: the Argentine bonds case before Italian courts. IYIL 16:165–185Google Scholar
• Borchard EM (1915) The diplomatic protection of citizens abroad. The Banks Law Publishing Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Borchard E (1951) State insolvency and foreign bondholders, vol I, General principles. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
• Bordoni M (2006) Default nel debito pubblico ed immunità dello Stato estero dalla giurisdizione civile. RDI 1031–1059Google Scholar
• Born GB (1996) International Civil Litigation in United States Courts, 3rd edn. Kluwer, The Hague/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
• Bothe M, Brink J (1986) Public debt restructuring, the case for international economic co-operation. GYIL 29:86–110Google Scholar
• Bowett DW (1957) Estoppel before international tribunals and its relation to acquiescence. BYIL 33:176–202Google Scholar
• Brand RA, Jablonski SR (2007) Forum non conveniens. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Bredimas A, Gourgourinis A, Pavlidis G (2013) The legal contours of sovereign debt restructuring under the UNCTAD principles: antagonism and convergence between standards of domestic insolvency law and international investment protection law. In: Esposito C, Li Y, Bohoslavky JP (eds) Sovereign financing and international law. OUP, Oxford, pp 135–160Google Scholar
• Brower CN, Brueschke JD (1998) The Iran–United States claims tribunals. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
• Brower CN, Bistline FW Jr, Loomis GW Jr (1979) The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 in practice. AJIL 73:200–214Google Scholar
• Brown CR (1984) Enforcing sovereign lending. IFLR July 5–8Google Scholar
• Brown HL (1999) The extraterritorial reach of the U.S. government’s campaign against international bribery. Hastings Int’l & Comp L Rev 22:407–522Google Scholar
• Brownlie I (2003) Principles of public international law, 6th edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Brownlie I (2008) Principles of public international law, 7th edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Buchheit LC (1987) Act of state and comity: recent developments. In: Sassoon DM, Bradlow DD (eds) Judicial enforcement of international debt obligations. International Law Institute, Washington, pp 95–106Google Scholar
• Buchheit LC, Karpinski E (2006) Grenada’s innovation. JIBLR 21:227–231Google Scholar
• Buchheit LC, Gulati GM, Thompson RB (2007) The dilemma of odious debts. Duke L J 56:1201–1262Google Scholar
• Burke-White WW (2008) The Argentine financial crisis: state liability under BITs and the legitimacy of the ICSID system. Asian J WTO 3:199–229Google Scholar
• Burke-White WW, von Staden A (2008) Investment protection in extraordinary times: the interpretation and application of non-precluded measures provisions in bilateral investment treaties. Va J Int’l L 48:307–410Google Scholar
• Buckley RP (2006) Iraq’s sovereign debt and its curious global implications. In: Heazle M, Islam I (eds) Beyond the Iraq war: the promises, pitfalls and perils. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, pp 141–155Google Scholar
• Buckley RP (2008) International financial system. Policy and regulation. Wolters Kluwer, AustinGoogle Scholar
• Caflisch L (1992) Unequal treaties. GYIL 35:52–80Google Scholar
• Cahn HJ (1950) The responsibility of the successor state for war debts. AJIL 44:477–487Google Scholar
• Calamita NJ (2006) Rethinking comity: towards a coherent treatment of international parallel proceedings. U Pa J Int’l Econ L 27:601–680Google Scholar
• Caplan LCM (2001) The constitution and jurisdiction over foreign states: the 1996 amendment to Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act in perspective. Va J Int’l L 41:369–426Google Scholar
• Carillo-Batalla Lucas V (1995) Conflicts of laws in international lending transactions – governing law and choice of forum. In: Carreau D, Shaw MN (sous dir de/eds) The external debt (La dette exterieure). Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht/Boston/London, pp 409–484Google Scholar
• Carr I (2007) Corruption in Africa: is the African Union Convention on combating corruption the answer? JBL 111–136Google Scholar
• Cashel TW (1986) The act of state doctrine reviewed. JIBL 1:30–44Google Scholar
• Cavaglieri A (1929) Règles générales du droit de la paix. Recueil des Cours 26:312–586Google Scholar
• Cheng B (1955) Justice and equity in international law. Current Leg Probs 8:185–211Google Scholar
• Cheng B (1987) General principles of law, 2nd edn. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Collier J, Lowe V (1999) The settlement of international disputes in international law. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Collins (Lord of Mapesbury) (gen ed) (2012) Dicey, Morris and Collins on the conflict of laws, vol 1, 15th edn. Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Conforti B (2006) Diritto internazionale, VII ediz. Editoriale Scientifica, NapoliGoogle Scholar
• Crawford J (1981) Execution of judgments and foreign sovereign immunity. AJIL 75:820–869Google Scholar
• Crawford J (1983) International law and foreign sovereigns: distinguishing immune transactions. BYIL 54:75–118Google Scholar
• Crawford J (2002) The International Law Commission’s articles on state responsibility. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Crépau F, Côté R, Rehaag S (2011) Article 71. In: Corten O, Klein P (eds) The Vienna Conventions on the law of treaties. A commentary, vol II. OUP, Oxford, pp 1612–1626Google Scholar
• Crook JR (1989) Applicable law in international arbitration: the Iran–U.S. claims tribunal experience. AJIL 83:278–311Google Scholar
• Crook JR (1998) Debt and contract claims before the tribunal. In: Lillich RB, Magraw DB (eds) The Iran–United States claim tribunal: its contribution to the law of state responsibility. Transnational Publishers, Irvington-on-Hudson, pp 267–302Google Scholar
• Cuniberti G (2005) Forum non conveniens and the Brussels Convention. ICLQ 54:973–982Google Scholar
• Dawson JP (1951) Unjust enrichment. A comparative analysis. Little Brown & Co, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Dagan H (1997) Unjust enrichment. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• de Cuvelier A (1888) De l’incompétence des tribunaux nationaux a l’égard des gouvernments étrangers. Rev dr int 20:109–127Google Scholar
• de La Pradelle A, Politis N (1932) Recueil des arbitrages internationaux, tome 2me. Les Editions Internationales, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Delaume GR (1967) Legal aspects of international lending and economic development financing. Oceana, Dobbs FerryGoogle Scholar
• Delaume GR (1977) Three perspectives on foreign immunity. AJIL 71:399–422Google Scholar
• Delaume GR (1979) The State Immunity Act of the United Kingdom. AJIL 73:185–214Google Scholar
• Delaume GR (1980) Long-arm jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. AJIL 74:640–655Google Scholar
• Delaume GR (1989) Sovereign immunity and public debt. Int’l Lawyer 23:811–825Google Scholar
• Dellapenna JW (2003) Suing foreign governments and their corporations, 2nd edn. Transnational Publishers, ArdeleyGoogle Scholar
• Despagnet F (1910) Cours de droit international public, 4me éd. Recueil Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Detter I (1966) The problem of unequal treaties. ICLQ 15:1069–1089Google Scholar
• Diena G (1898) Il fallimento degli Stati e il diritto internazionale. Unione Tipografico-Editrice, TorinoGoogle Scholar
• Dolinger J (1982) World public policy: real international public policy in the conflict of laws. Texas J Int’l L 17:167–183Google Scholar
• Dorigo S (2002) Il debito pubblico argentino dinanzi ai giudici italiani. RDI 958–962Google Scholar
• Draetta U (1988) Il diritto dei contratti internazionali. La patologia dei contratti. Cedam, PadovaGoogle Scholar
• Drobnig U (1997) Protection of the weaker party. In: Bonelli MJ, Bonelli F (a cura di) Contratti commerciali internazionali e principi Unidroit. Giuffrè, Milano, pp 215–224Google Scholar
• Du Plessis ED (1986) Exchange control: South Africa’s debt standstill provisions. JIBL 1:87–99Google Scholar
• Ebenroth C-T, Teitz LE (1985) Winning (or losing) by default: the Act of State Doctrine, Sovereign Immunity and Comity in international business transactions. Int’l Lawyer 19:225–258Google Scholar
• Ebke WF (1989) Article VIII, Section 2(b), international monetary cooperation, and the courts. Int’l Lawyer 23:677–710Google Scholar
• Edwards RW (1985) International monetary collaboration. Transnational Publishers, Dobbs FerryGoogle Scholar
• El-Kosheri AS, Leboulangers P (1984) L’arbitrage face à la corruption at aux trafics d’influence. Rev Arb 3–18Google Scholar
• El Sawah S, Vinuales JE (2013) L’immunitè d’exécution dans l’affaire de l’Ara Libertad devant le TIDM. JDI 140:867–899Google Scholar
• Espeche Gil MA (1995) Solicitud de una opinion consultive ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia de la Haya. In: Schipani S (a cura di) Debito internazionale. Principi generali del diritto. Cedam, Padova, pp 363–370Google Scholar
• Fanara E (1966) Gestione di affari e arricchimento senza causa nel diritto internazionale. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
• Fauchille P (1922) Traité de droit international public, Tome Ier, première partie, 8me éd. Librarie Arthur Rousseau, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Fawcett JES (1964) The International Monetary Fund and the law. BYIL 41:32–76Google Scholar
• Fawcett JJ, Carruthers JM (eds) and North (Sir) P (consult ed) (2008) Cheshire, North & Fawcett private international law, 14th edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Feibelman A (2010) Ecuador sovereign default: a pyrrhic victory for odious debt? JIBLR 25:357–362Google Scholar
• Feilchenfeld EH (1931) Public debts and state succession. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Fischer Williams (Sir) J (1924) International law and international financial obligations arising from contract. Bibliotheca Visseriana II 1–85Google Scholar
• Fischer Williams (Sir) J (1932) A legal footnote to the story of German reparations. BYIL 13:9–38Google Scholar
• Forget L (2001) The criminal law convention on corruption of the Council of Europe. In: Schlemmer-Schulte S, Tung K-Y (eds) Liber Amicorum Ibrahim FI Shihata. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 235–263Google Scholar
• Foorman JL, Jehle ME (1982) Effects of state succession and government succession on Commercial Bank loans to sovereign borrowers. U Ill L Rev 1:9–38Google Scholar
• Forteau M (2011) L’ordre public “transnational” ou “réellement international”. JDI 138:3–49Google Scholar
• Foster D (2006) “Necessity Knows no Law!”: LG&E v. Argentina. Int’l ALR 9:149–155Google Scholar
• Fouchard P (1997) Droit et morale dans les relations économiques internationales. Revue des sciences morales et politiques 1–27Google Scholar
• Fox H (2008) The law of state immunity, 2nd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Francioni F (1975) Compensation for nationalisation of foreign property: the borderland between law and equity. ICLQ 24:255–283Google Scholar
• Frankenberg G, Knieper R (1984) Legal problems of overindebtedness of developing countries: the current relevance of the doctrine of odious debts. Int’l J Soc of Law 12:415–438Google Scholar
• Friedman W (1963) The uses of “General Principles” in the development of international law. AJIL 57:279–299Google Scholar
• Gaillard E, Savage J (eds) (1999) Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on international commercial arbitration. Kluwer, The Hague/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
• Galbraith JK (1955) The great crash: 1929. Hamish Hamilton, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Gallo P (1992) Unjust enrichment: a comparative analysis. AJCL 40:431–465Google Scholar
• Gathii JT (2006) The sanctity of sovereign loan contracts and its origins in enforcement litigation. Geo Wash Int’l L Rev 38:251–325Google Scholar
• Gelpern A (2005) What Iraq and Argentina might learn from each other. Chi J Int’l L 6:391–414Google Scholar
• Gianviti F (1973) Réflexions sur l’Article VIII, Section 2(b) des Statuts du Fonds Monétaire International. Rev crit 62(472–487):629–661Google Scholar
• Gianviti F (1980) Le contrôle des changes étrangers devant le juge national. Rev crit 69:659–703Google Scholar
• Godechot J (par) (1995) Les Constitutions de la France depuis 1789. GF-Flammarion, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Goff of Chieveley (Lord), Jones G (2007) The law of restitution, 7th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Gold J (1962) The fund agreement in the courts, vol I. IMF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
• Gold J (1982) The fund agreement in the courts, vol II. IMF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
• Gold J (1984) “Exchange Contracts”, exchange control, and the IMF articles of agreement: some animadversions on Wilson, Smithett & Cope Ltd. v. Terruzzi. ICLQ 33:777–810Google Scholar
• Gold J (1986) The fund agreement in the courts, vol III. IMF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
• Gold J (1989) The fund agreement in the courts, vol IV. IMF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
• Goldmann M (2012) Sovereign crises as threats to peace: restructuring under chapter VII of the UN Charter? GoJIL 4:153–175Google Scholar
• Gordley J (1981) Equality in exchange. Calif L Rev 69:1587–1656Google Scholar
• Grotii Hugonis (MDCCLVIII–MDCCLIX) De Jure Belli ac Pacis (first published 1625). Sumptibus Marci-Michaelis Bousquet, LausannaeGoogle Scholar
• Grotius H (1926) The jurisprudence of Holland (first published 1631, trans: Lee RW). Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Gutteridge HC, David RJA (1933–1935) The doctrine of unjustified enrichment. Cam L J 5:204–229Google Scholar
• Halsbury (Lord) (1910) The laws of England, vol XIII. Butterworth & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Halverston K (2001) Is a foreign state a “Person”? does it matter? personal jurisdiction, due process, and the Foreign Immunities Sovereign Act. NYU J Int’l L & Pol 34:115–187Google Scholar
• Hambro E (1954) The authority of the advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice. ICLQ 3:2–22Google Scholar
• Hanlon J (2006a) Defining “Illegitimate Debt”: when creditors should be liable for improper loans. In: Jochnick C, Preston FA (eds) Sovereign debt at the crossroads. OUP, Oxford, pp 109–131Google Scholar
• Hanlon J (2006b) Illegitimate’ loans: lenders, not borrowers, are responsible. Third World Q 27:211–226Google Scholar
• Hannikainen L (1988) Peremptory norms (Jus Cogens) in international law. Historical development, criteria, present status. Lakimiesliton Kustannus, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
• Hare C (2006) Forum non conveniens in Europe: game over or time for “Reflexion”? JBL 157–179Google Scholar
• Heathcote S (2007) Est-ce que l’état de nécessité est un principe de droit international coutumier? RBDI 40:53–89Google Scholar
• Henkin L (1967) Act of state today: recollection in tranquillity. Colum J Trans L 6:175–189Google Scholar
• Henkin L (1996) Foreign affairs and the United States constitution, 2nd edn. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Hertslet’s China Treaties (1908), vol I, 3rd edn by Hertslet GEP. Printed for HM’s Stationery Office by Harrison’s and Sons Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Hess B (1993) The International Law Commission’s Draft Convention on the jurisdictional immunities of states and their property. EJIL 4:269–282Google Scholar
• Higgins R (1977) Recent developments in the law of sovereign immunity in the United Kingdom. AJIL 71:423–437Google Scholar
• Higgins R (1982) Certain unresolved aspects of the law of state immunity. NILR 29:265–276Google Scholar
• Horn N (1985) Standard clauses on contract adaptation in international commerce. In: Horn N (ed) Adaptation and renegotiation of contracts in international trade and finance. Kluwer, Deventer, pp 111–140Google Scholar
• Howse R (2013) Concluding remarks in the light of international law. In: Esposito C, Li Y, Bohoslavky JP (eds) Sovereign financing and international law. OUP, Oxford, pp 385–389Google Scholar
• Huberi Ulrici (MDCCLXXXIV) De Conflictu Legum, in Praelectionum Juris Civilis Tomi Tres Secundum Institutiones et Digesta Justiniani (first published, 1687–1690). Expensis Josephi et Johannis Roland Fratrum ex Typographo Josephi de Bisogno, NeapoliGoogle Scholar
• Hume D (2008a) Of civil liberty (first published 1741 as of liberty and despotism). In: Copley S, Edgar A (eds) Selected essays. OUP, Oxford, pp 49–56Google Scholar
• Hume D (2008b) On public debt (first published 1752). In: Copley S, Edgar A (eds) Selected essays. OUP, Oxford, pp 203–216Google Scholar
• Hyde CC (1922) International law, vol 1, 2nd edn. Little Brown and Co, BostonGoogle Scholar
• IMF (2009) Selected decisions, 34th edn. IMF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
• Iustiniani Augusti (MDCCCLXX) Digesta (ed by Mommsen T) Apud Weidmannos, BeroliniGoogle Scholar
• Janis MW (1995) Equity. In: Bernhardt E (ed) Encyclopedia, vol II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 109Google Scholar
• Jayachandran S, Kremer M (2006) Odious debt. In: Jochnick C, Preston FA (eds) Sovereign debt at the crossroads. OUP, Oxford, pp 215–225Google Scholar
• Jennings (Sir) R, Watts (Sir) A (gen eds) (1992) Oppenheim’s international law, vol 1, 9th edn. Longman, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Jessup PC (1939) The doctrine of Erie Railroad v. Tompkins applied to international law. AJIL 33:740–743Google Scholar
• Jèze G (1935) Les defaillances d’Etat. Recueil des Cours 53:377–436Google Scholar
• Jimenez de Arechaga E (1978) State responsibility for the nationalization of foreign owned property. NYU J Int’l L & Pol 11:179–195Google Scholar
• Justo JB (2013) UNCTAD’s principles on public debt and the United Nations Convention against corruption: links and common strategies. In: Esposito C, Li Y, Bohoslavky JP (eds) Sovereign financing and international law. OUP, Oxford, pp 189–211Google Scholar
• Kahale G III (1989) New legislation in US facilitates the enforcement of arbitral agreement against … foreign states. J Int’l Arb 6(2):57–64Google Scholar
• Kahale G III, Vega MA (1979) Immunity and jurisdiction: toward a uniform body of law in actions against foreign states. Colum J Trans L 18:211–258Google Scholar
• Kane MK (1982) Suing foreign sovereign: a procedural compass. Stan L R 34:385–425Google Scholar
• Kebedgy MS (1894) De la protection des créanciers d’un Etat étranger. JDI 21:504–519Google Scholar
• Keith AB (1907) The theory of state succession, with special reference to English and Colonial law. Waterlow and Sons, Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Kessedjian C, Schreuer C (1992) Le projet d’articles de la Commission du droit international des Nations-Unies sur les immunités des Etats. RGDIP 96:299–339Google Scholar
• King JA (2007) Odious debt: the terms of the debate. NC J Int’l & Com Reg 32:605–667Google Scholar
• Kiss A (1992) Abuse of rights. In: Bernhardt E (ed) Encyclopedia, vol I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 4Google Scholar
• Kleinheisterkamp J (2009) Art. 7.1.7 (force majeure). In: Vogenauer S, Kleinheisterkamp J (eds) Commentary on the UNIDROIT principles of international commercial contracts (PICC). OUP, Oxford, pp 766–776Google Scholar
• Knoepfer F (1998) Corruption et arbitrage international. In: Les contrats de distributions. Contributions offertes au professeur François Dessmontet à l’occasion de 50 ans. CEDIDAC, Lausanne, pp 357–379Google Scholar
• Kofele-Kale N (2000) The right to a corruption-free society as an individual and collective human right: elevating official corruption to a crime under international law. Int’l Lawyer 34:149–178Google Scholar
• Korovin EA (1929) Soviet treaties and international law. AJIL 22:753–763Google Scholar
• Kraska J (2013) The Ara Libertad (Argentina v Ghana). AJIL 107:404–410Google Scholar
• Kunika-Michalska B (1995) La deuda externa latinoamericana y el delito de usura. In: Schipani S (a cura di) Debito internazionale. Principi generali del diritto. Cedam, Padova, pp 221–229Google Scholar
• Lalive J-F (1953) L’immunité de jurisdiction des Etats et des organisations internationales. Recueil des Cours 83:205–396Google Scholar
• Lalive P (1986) Ordre Publique International (ou réellement international) et arbitrage international. Rev arb 329–373Google Scholar
• Lando O (1980) Renegotiation and revision of international contracts. GYIL 23:37–58Google Scholar
• Lauterpacht H (1927) Private law sources and analogies of international law. Longmans Green & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Lauterpacht H (1951) The problem of jurisdictional immunities of foreign states. BYIL 28:220–272Google Scholar
• Lee PL (2003) Central banks and sovereign immunities. Colum J Trans L 41:327–396Google Scholar
• Lesguillons H (1979) Frustration, Force majeure, Imprevision, Wegfall der Geschäftsgrundläge. DPCI 5:507–532Google Scholar
• Lew A (1994) Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, INC: interpreting the Sovereign Immunities Act’s commercial activity’s exception to jurisdictional immunity. Fordham Int’l L J 17:726–775Google Scholar
• Lewandowski M (1896) De la protection des capitaux empruntés en France par les états étrangers ou les sociétés. Guillomin et Cie, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Lewellyn Davies DJ (1937) The influence of Huber’s De Conflictu Legum on English private international law. BYIL 18:49–78Google Scholar
• Lienau O (2008) Who is the “Sovereign” in sovereign debt? reinterpreting a rule-of-law framework from the early twentieth century. Yale J Int’l L 33:63–111Google Scholar
• Lowenfeld AF (1974) Litigating a sovereign immunity claim – the Haiti case. NYU L R 49:377–436Google Scholar
• Lowenfeld A (2008) International economic law, 2nd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• MacDonald J (2007) A free nation deep in debt: the financial roots of democracy. Farrar Straus and Girouz, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• MacGibbon IC (1958) Estoppel in international law. ICLQ 7:468–513Google Scholar
• Maier HG (1984) Resolving extraterritorial conflicts, or “There and Back Again”. Va J Int’l L 25:7–41Google Scholar
• Mancina EF (2004) Sinners in the hands of an angry god: resurrecting the odious debt doctrine in international law. Geo Wash Int’l Rev 36:1239–1262Google Scholar
• Mann FA (1953) The private international law of exchange contracts under the International Monetary Fund. ICLQ 2:97–107Google Scholar
• Mann FA (1979) The State Immunity Act 1978. BYIL 50:43–62Google Scholar
• Mann FA (1992) The legal aspect of money, 5th edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Marcelli F (2004) Il debito estero dei paesi in via di sviluppo. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
• McCormick C (1984) The commercial activity exception to foreign sovereign immunity and the Act of State Doctrine. L & Pol Int’l Bus 16:477–538Google Scholar
• McKibben LA (1990) The political relationship between the United States and Pacific Islands Entities: the path to self-government in the Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, and Guam. Harv Int’l L J 31:257–293Google Scholar
• McNair (Lord) (1961) The law of treaties. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Meessen KM (1995) The role of international law in the twenty-first century: fighting corruption across the border. Fordham Int’l L J 18:1647–1652Google Scholar
• Meili F (1905) International civil and commercial law (trans: Kuhn AK). Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Mentri M (2003) Le rôle de la Cour internationale de justice dans le traitement de la dette extérieure des pays en developpement. In: Catalano P, Sid Ahmed A (sous dir de) La dette contre le developpement. CNES/ISPROM/PUBLISUD, Paris, pp 93–101Google Scholar
• Meron T (2006) Reflections on the prosecution of war crimes by international tribunals. AJIL 100:551–579Google Scholar
• Merrills JG (1977) Interpretation of the Bretton Woods Agreement. ICLQ 26:218–223Google Scholar
• Michaels R (2009) Preamble-I. In: Vogenauer S, Kleinheisterkamp J (eds) Commentary on the UNIDROIT principles of international commercial contracts (PICC). OUP, Oxford, pp 21–80Google Scholar
• Michalowski S (2007) Unconstitutional regimes and the validity of sovereign debt: a legal perspective. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
• Michalowski S, Bohoslavsky JP (2009) Ius Cogens, transitional justice and other trends on odious debts: a response to the world bank discussion papers on odious debts. Colum J Trans L 48:59–113Google Scholar
• Mirkine-Guetzevitch B (1925) La doctrine soviétique du droit international. RGDIP 32:313–316Google Scholar
• Moore JB (1906) A digest of international law, vol I. US Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
• Moore JB (1931) International adjudications. Modern series, vol IV. OUP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Morris JHC (2009) The conflict of laws, 7th edn by McClean D, Beevers K. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Mosler H (1995) General principles of the law. In: Bernhardt E (ed) Encyclopedia, vol II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 511Google Scholar
• Moulin HA (1907) La doctrine de Drago. RGDIP 14:417–472Google Scholar
• Moulton HG, Pasvolsky L (1929) World war debt settlements. The MacMillan Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Müller JP, Cottier T (1995) Estoppel. In: Bernhardt E (ed) Encyclopedia, vol II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 116Google Scholar
• Lord M (1988) The New Lex Mercatoria: the first twenty-five years. Arb Int’l 4:86–119Google Scholar
• Neumann T, Peters A (2013) Switzerland. In: Reinisch A (ed) The privileges and immunities of international organizations in domestic courts. OUP, Oxford, pp 241–274Google Scholar
• Newman JD (1986) Exchange controls and foreign loans default: force majeure as an alternative defense. Iowa L Rev 71:1499–1525Google Scholar
• Nichols PM (1999) Regulating transnational bribery in times of globalisations and fragmentation. Yale J Int’l L 24:257–297Google Scholar
• Note (1988) General principles of international commercial arbitration. Harv L Rev 101:1816–1834Google Scholar
• Novak JE, Rotunda RD (2004) Constitutional law, 7th edn. Thomson/West, St PaulGoogle Scholar
• Nurick L (1987) The International Monetary Fund articles of agreement. In: Sassoon DM, Bradlow DD (eds) Judicial enforcement of international debt obligations. International Law Institute, Washington, pp 107–117Google Scholar
• Nussbaum A (1950a) The arbitration between Lena Goldfields Ltd and The Soviet Government. Cornell L Q 36:31–41Google Scholar
• Nussbaum A (1950b) Exchange control and the International Monetary Fund. Yale L J 59:421–430Google Scholar
• Nuyts A (2003) L’exception de forum non conveniens. Bruylant, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
• Oberyesekere SCA (1984) International economic co-operation through international law: the IMF Agreement and recognition of foreign exchange control regulation. GYIL 27:142–195Google Scholar
• Ochoa C (2008) From odious debt to odious finance: avoiding the externalities of a functional odious debt doctrine. Harv J Int’l L 49:109–159Google Scholar
• O’Connell DP (1956a) Unjust enrichment. AJCL 5:2–17Google Scholar
• O’Connell DP (1956b) The law of state succession. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• O’Connell DP (1967) State succession in municipal law and international law, vol I, 2nd edn. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Oeter S (1995) State succession and the struggle over equity: some observations on the laws of state succession with respect to state property and debts in cases of separation and dissolution of states. GYIL 38:73–102Google Scholar
• O’Keefe R (2001) Customary international crimes in English courts. BYIL 72:293–336Google Scholar
• O’Keefe R (2004) Legal consequences of the construction a wall in the occupied territory: a commentary. RBDI 37:92–149Google Scholar
• Oppetit B (1974) L’adaptation des contrats internationaux aux changements de circomstances: la clause de hardship. JDI 101:794–814Google Scholar
• Orakelashvily A (2006) Peremptory norms in international law. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Osakwe C (1982) A Soviet perspective on foreign sovereign immunity: law and practice. Va J Int’l L 23:13–52Google Scholar
• Osuna O (2007) L’apport de la jurisprudence internationale en matière de necessité économique et financière avant 1945. In: SFDI, La necessité en droit International. Pedone, Paris, pp 357–366Google Scholar
• Paddeu FI (2012) A genealogy of force majeure in international law. BYIL 82:381–494Google Scholar
• Patrikis E (1982) Foreign central bank property: immunity from attachment in the United States. U Ill L Rev 1:265–287Google Scholar
• Patrikis E (1992) Sovereign immunity and central bank immunity in the United States. In: Effros RC (ed) Current legal issues affecting central banks, vol 1. IMF, Washington, pp 159–167Google Scholar
• Paul JR (1991) Comity in international law. Harv Int’l L J 32:1–79Google Scholar
• Paust JJ (2004) “Equal Treaty Rights”, resident status and forum non conveniens. Houston J Int’l L 26:405–409Google Scholar
• Pearce R, Stevens J (2006) The law of trusts and equitable obligations, 4th edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Phillimore (Sir) R (1882) Commentaries upon international law, vol II, 3rd edn. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Pizzurro JD (1992) Republic of Argentina v Weltover Inc. AJIL 86:820–824Google Scholar
• Politis NE (1894) Les emprunts d’Etat en droit international. Pedone, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Politis N (1925) Le problème des limitations de la souverainité et la théorie de l’abus des droits dans les rapports internationaux. Recueil des Cours 6:1–122Google Scholar
• Proctor C (ed) (2005) Mann on the legal aspect of money, 6th edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Pugliese M (1936) Note giuridico-finanziarie sul problema del ripudio dei debiti pubblici nei rapporti interni e internazionali. Studi sc giur soc 33–83Google Scholar
• Quadri R (1941) La giurisdizione sugli Stati stranieri. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
• Radicati di Brozolo LG (1992) La giurisdizione esecutiva e cautelare nei confronti degli Stati stranieri. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
• Ramasastry A (2002) From Nuremberg to Rangoon: an examination of forced labor cases and their impact on the liability of multinational corporations. Berkley J Int’l Law 20:91–159Google Scholar
• Ramsey MD (1998) Act of state and foreign sovereign obligations. Harv Int’l L J 39:1–100Google Scholar
• Rao PC, Khan R (2001) The international tribunal for the law of the sea. Matinus Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
• Reinisch A (2007) Necessity in international investment arbitration – an unnecessary split of opinions in recent ICSID cases? J WIT 8:191–214Google Scholar
• Rendell RS (1986) The allied bank case and its aftermath. Int’l Lawyer 20:819–845Google Scholar
• Reuben Clark J Jr (1940) Collecting on defaulted foreign dollar bonds. AJIL 34:119–125Google Scholar
• Reuter P (1980) Quelques réflexions sur l’équité en droit international. RBDI 12:165–186Google Scholar
• Ripert G (1933) Les règles du droit civil applicables aux rapports internationaux. Recueil des Cours 44:565–664Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman S (2004) Governance and corruption. In: Lomborg B (ed) Global crises, global solutions. CUP, Cambridge, pp 301–344Google Scholar
• Ruzé R (1913) Un arbitrage russo-turc. Rev dr int 331–371Google Scholar
• Sack AN (1927) Les effets des transformations des Etats sur leur dettes publiques et autres obligations financiers. Recueil Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Sack AN (1928) La succession aux dettes publiques d’Etats. Recueil des Cours 23:149–326Google Scholar
• Sack AN (1937–1938) Diplomatic claims against the Soviets. NYU LQR 15:507–535Google Scholar
• Salmon J (1987) Les circonstances excluant l’illiceité. In: Zemanek K, Salmon J (eds) Responsabilité internazionale. Pedone, Paris, pp 89–225Google Scholar
• Samuels VC (1985) Retroactive application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: a due process analysis. Geo Wash J Int’l L & Econ 19:871–913Google Scholar
• Santucci EA (1985) Sovereign debt resolution through the International Monetary Fund: an alternative to the allied bank decision. Denv J Int’l L & Pol 14:1–34Google Scholar
• Sarcevic P (1986) Two approaches to the debt problem: A) adjustment of loan agreements (De Lege Lata) B) strengthening of International Monetary Soft Law (De Lege Ferenda). In: Dicke DC (ed) Foreign debts in the present and a new international economic order. Fribourg University Press, Fribourg, pp 130–156Google Scholar
• Sayed A (2004) Corruption in international trade and commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International, The Hague/London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Schill SW (2007) International investment law and the host state’s power to handle economic crises. J Int’l Arb 24:265–286Google Scholar
• Schill SW (2010) German constitutional court rules on necessity in Argentine Bondholder case. ASIL Insights 11(20)Google Scholar
• Schlemmer EC (2007) Sovereign Reliance on a state of necessity: always an acceptable defence. SAYIL 32:493–510Google Scholar
• Schmerler CD (2006) Restructuring sovereign debt. In: Silkenat JR, Schmerler CD (eds) The law of international insolvencies and restructurings. Oceana, Dobbs Ferry, pp 431–471Google Scholar
• Schmitthoff M (1937) The international government loan. J Comp Leg 19:177–196Google Scholar
• Schofield LG (1980) Effects jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. NYU L R 55:474–516Google Scholar
• Schrage EJH (1999) Unjustified enrichment. NILR 46:57–86Google Scholar
• Schreuer CH (1988) State immunity: some recent developments. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Schreuer C (2000) Unjust enrichment. Addendum. In: Bernhardt E (ed) Encyclopedia, vol IV. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 1243Google Scholar
• Schreuer C (2001) The ICSID Convention: a commentary. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Schwab G (1985) The unenforceability of international contracts violating foreign exchange restrictions: Article VIII, Section 2(b) of the International Monetary Fund Agreement. Va J Int’l L 25:967–1005Google Scholar
• Schwarzenberger G (1956) Uses and abuses of the “Abuse of Rights” in international law. Trans Grot Soc’y 42:147–179Google Scholar
• Schwarzenberger G (1957) International law, vol 1, 3rd edn. Stevens & Sons Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Scoles EF, Hay P, Borches PJ, Symeonides SC (2004) Conflict of laws, 4th edn. Thomson West, St PaulGoogle Scholar
• Sgro JA (1983) China’s stance on sovereign immunity: a critical perspective of Jackson v. People’s Republic of China. Colum J Trans L 22:101–133Google Scholar
• Shaw MN (2008) International law, 6th edn. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Shihata IFI (2000) The World Bank in a changing world, vol III. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague/London/BostonGoogle Scholar
• Shuster MR (1973) The public international law of money. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Sinclair IM (1973) The European Convention on state immunity. ICLQ 22:254–283Google Scholar
• Sinclair (Sir) I (1980) The law of sovereign immunity: recent developments. Recueil des Cours 167:113–284Google Scholar
• Singer M (1981) The act of state doctrine of the United Kingdom: an analysis, with comparison to United States practices. AJIL 75:283–323Google Scholar
• Sloane RD (2012) On the use and abuse of necessity in the law of state responsibility. AJIL: 106:447–508Google Scholar
• Sookun D (2010) Stop vulture funds lawsuits. Commonwealth Secretariat, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Steiner HJ, Vagts DE, Koh HH (1994) Transnational legal problems: materials and text, 4th edn. The Foundation Press Inc, WestburyGoogle Scholar
• Stevenson R, Browne JF (1980) United States law of sovereign immunity relating to international financial transactions. In: Rendell RS (ed) International financial law. Euromoney, London, pp 85–103Google Scholar
• Stevenson R, Browne JF, Fisler Damrosch L (1983) United States law of sovereign immunity relating to international financial transactions. In: Rendell RS (ed) International financial law, vol 1, 2nd edn. Euromoney, London, pp 97–116Google Scholar
• Story J (1883) Commentaries on the conflict of laws, 8th edn. Little Brown & Co, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Tahyar ME (1986) The act of state doctrine: resolving debt situs confusion. Colum L Rev 86:594–617Google Scholar
• Tallon D (1987) Article 79. In: Bianca CM, Bonell MJ (eds) Commentary on the international sales law. Giuffrè, Milan, pp 572–595Google Scholar
• Talmon S (2001) Recognition of governments in international law: with particular reference to governments in exile. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
• Thal SN (1998) The inequality of bargaining power doctrine: the problem of defining contractual unfairness. OJLS 8:17–33Google Scholar
• Tien-Shi Hsu R (1983) The invalidity of the default judgment in Jackson v. People’s Republic of China. Va J Int’l L 23:569–580Google Scholar
• Tigert RR (1985) Allied bank international: a United States government perspective. NYU J Int’l L & Pol 17:511–526Google Scholar
• Treitel GH (1994) Frustration and force majeure. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Tudor John W (1984) Sovereign immunity. In: Kalderén L, Siddiqi QS (eds) in collaboration with Chronnell F, Watson P, Sovereign borrowers. Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, Upsala/Butterworths, London, pp 144–155Google Scholar
• Vagts DF (2004) Sovereign bankruptcy: In re Germany (1953) In re Iraq (2004). AJIL 98:302–306Google Scholar
• Vallée C (1973) Quelques observations sur l’estoppel en droit des gens. RGDIP 77:949–999Google Scholar
• van Bynkershoeck Cornelii (1752) De Foro Legatorum (first published 1721) In: Opera Minora (editio secunda) apud Samuelem Luchtmans et Filios, Lugduni BatavorumGoogle Scholar
• van Hecke G (1964) Problèmes juridiques des emprunts internationaux, 2me éd, vol XVIII. Bibliotheca Visseriana, pp 1–316Google Scholar
• Verdeer VV (1998) The Lena Goldfields arbitration: the historical roots of three ideas. ICLQ 47:747–792Google Scholar
• Verdross A (1931) Les règles internationales concernant le traitement des étrangers. Recueil des Cours 37:327–412Google Scholar
• Villiger EM (2009) Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the law of treaties. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
• von Mehern T, Trautman DT (1966) Jurisdiction to adjudicate: a suggested analysis. Harv L R 79:1121–1179Google Scholar
• Waibel M (2007) Two worlds of necessity in ICSID arbitration: CMS and LG&E. LJIL 20:637–648Google Scholar
• Wälde T (1987) The sanctity of debt and insolvent countries. In: Sassoon DM, Bradlow DD (eds) Judicial enforcement of international debt obligations. International Law Institute, Washington, pp 119–145Google Scholar
• Wall JM (1987) Allied’s Flawed application of the Act of State Doctrine: impropriety of the doctrine in international finance. Cornell Int’l L J 20:253–280Google Scholar
• Warne D, Bridge E (2006) Enforcement of a judgment against a state in the UK: important lessons for creditors. BJIBFL 21:261–262Google Scholar
• Watrin G (1929) Essai de construction d’un contentieux international des dettes publiques. Recueil Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Weil P (1983) Towards relativity normativity in international law? AJIL 77:413–442Google Scholar
• Weintraub RJ (2005) “Equal Treaty Rights”: a response to Professor Paust “Equal Treaty Rights”. Houston J Int’l L 27:241–252Google Scholar
• Weisburd AM (1995) State courts, federal courts and international cases. Yale J Int’l L 20:1–64Google Scholar
• Weiss A (1923) Compétence ou incompétence des tribunaux à l’égard des Etats étrangers. Recueil des Cours 1:521–552Google Scholar
• Weisz G, Schwarzkopf NE, Panitch M (1991) Selected issues in sovereign debt litigation. U Pa J Int’l Bus L 12:1–49Google Scholar
• Westlake J (1904) International law, part I: peace. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Wheeler CC, Attaran A (2003) Declawing the vulture funds: rehabilitation of a comity defense in sovereign litigation. Stan J Int’l L 39:253–284Google Scholar
• Whiteman MM (1963) Digest of international law, vol 2. US Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
• Wiederkher M-O (1974) La Convention européenne sur l’immunité des Etats du 16 mai 1972. AFDI 20:924–943Google Scholar
• Williams JS (1975) Extraterritorial enforcement of exchange control regulations under the International Monetary Fund Agreement. Va J Int’l L 15:319–396Google Scholar
• Williams P, Harris J (2001) State succession to debts and assets: the modern law and policy. Harv Int’l L J 42:355–808Google Scholar
• Wong Y (2012) Sovereign finance and the poverty of nations: odious debt in international law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
• Wood PR (2007) Conflict of laws and international finance. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Wortley BA (1959) Expropriation in public international law. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Wuarin A (1907) Essai sur les emprunts d’Etats et la protection des droits des porteurs de fonds d’Etats étrangers. Recueil Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Wuarin A (1912) De la protection des droits des porteurs de fonds d’Etats étrangers. JDI 39:25–43Google Scholar
• Wynne WH (1951) State insolvency and foreign bondholders, vol II: Selected case histories. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
• Yianni A, de Vera C (2010) The return of capital controls? L & Contemp Probs 73:357–371Google Scholar
• Yianni A, Tinkler D (2007) Is there a recognized legal doctrine of odious debts? NC J Int’l L & Com Reg 32:749–771Google Scholar
• Zaiteff RM, Kunz CT (1985) The act of state doctrine and the allied bank case. Bus Lawyer 40:449–483Google Scholar
• Zedalis RJ (2010) Claims against Iraqi oil and gas. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Zerbes I (2007) The offense of bribery of public officials. In: Pieth M, Low LA, Cullen P (eds) The OECD convention on bribery. CUP, Cambridge, pp 45–172Google Scholar
• Zimmerman R (1990) The law of obligations. Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Juta & Co, Cape Town