Global Governance

So-called Right to Democratic Governance

Embracing mainstream international law, this section on so-called right to democratic governance explores the context, history and effect of the area of the law covered here.

Resources

Further Reading

• The entry “democratic governance, so-called right to” in the Parry and Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law (currently, the Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law, 2009), Oxford University Press
• Alger, C. F. (1963). Comparison of intranational and international politics. American Political Science Review, 57(2), 406–419.
• Alger, C. F. (1984). Bridging the micro and the macro in international relations research. Alternatives, X(3), 319–344.
• Alker, H. R., Jr., Bloomfield, L. P., & Choucri, N. (1974). Analyzing global interdependence (Vols. 1–4). Cambridge, MA: Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Angell, N. (1912). The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
• Angell, R.C. (1969) Peace on the March: Transnational Participation, Volume 19 of New Perspectives in Political Science. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• Baldwin, D. A. (1979). Power analysis and world politics: New trends versus old tendencies. World Politics, 31(2), 161–194.
• Benner, T., Reinicke, W. H., & Witte, J. M. (2002). Shaping globalization: The role of global public policy networks. In Bertelsmann Foundation (Ed.), Transparency: A basis for responsibility and cooperation. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Foundation.
• Biermann, R. (2008). Towards a theory of inter-organizational networking. Review of International Organizations, 3(2), 151–77.
• Biermann, R., & Koops, J. (2015). Studying relations among international organizations: History, key concepts and theoretical challenges. In R. Biermann & J. Koops (Eds.), Palgrave handbook on inter-organizational relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: A study of world order. London: Macmillan.
• Cardoso, F. H. (1977). The consumption of dependency theory in the United States. Latin American Research Review, 12(3), 7–24.
• Carr, E. H. (1939). The twenty years crisis, 1919–1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. London: Macmillan.
• Coate, R. A. & Thiel, M. (Eds.). (2010). Identity politics in an age of globalization. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press/Lynne Rienner.
• Coleman, W. (2001). Policy networks, non-state actors and internationalized policy making: A case study of agricultural trade. In D. Josselin & W. Wallace (Eds.), Nonstate actors in world politics. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave, 93–112.
• Cook, K.S., & Emerson, R.M. (1978) Power, Equity, and Commitment in Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 721–739.
• Cooper, R. N. (1968). The economics of interdependence. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Crozier, M., & Thoenig, J. C. (1976). The regulation of complex organized systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(4), 547–570.
• Deutsch, K. W. (1954). Political community at the international level: Problems of definition and measurement. New York: Doubleday.
• Deutsch, K.W. (1966). The Nerves of Government. New York: Free Press.
• Dos Santos, T. (1973). The structure of dependence. American Economic Review, 60(2), 231–236.
• Duvall, R. D. (1978). Dependence and dependencia theory: Notes toward precision of concept and argument. International Organization, 32(1), 51–78.
• Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and networks. Sociological theories in progress, 2, 58–87.
• Feld, W. J. (1972). Nongovernmental forces and world politics. New York: Praeger.
• Florini, A. (Ed.). (1999). The third force: The rise of transnational civil society. Tokyo & Washington, DC: Japan Center for International Change and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
• Franke, U., & Koch, M. (2015). Sociological approaches. In R. Biermann & J. Koops (Eds.), Palgrave handbook on inter-organizational relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Galtung, J. (1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2), 81–117.
• Gordenker, L., & Weiss, T. (1995). Pluralising global governance: Analytical approaches and dimensions. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 357-387.
• Haas, E. (1975a). Is there a hole in the whole? Knowledge, technology, interdependence and the construction of international regimes. International Organization, 29(3), 827–876.
• Haas, E. (1975c). On systems and international regimes. World Politics, 27(1), 147–174.
• Haas, E. (1983). Words can hurt you: Or who said what to whom about regimes. In S. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 23–60). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Haas, P. M. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization, 43(3), 377–403.
• Haggard, S., & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of international regimes. International Organization, 41(3), 491–517.
• Holsti, K. J. (1978). A new international politics? Diplomacy in complex interdependence. International Organization, 32(2), 513–530.
• Jacobs, D. (1974). Dependency and vulnerability: An exchange approach to the control of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1), 45–59.
• Jönsson, C. (1986). Interorganization theory and international organization. International Studies Quarterly, 30(1), 39–57.
• Josselin, D., & Wallace, W. (Eds.). (2001). Non-state actors in world politics. New York: Palgrave.
• Kaplan, M. (1957). System and process in international politics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Katzenstein, P. J. (1975). International independence: Some long-term trends and recent changes. International Organization, 29(4), 1021–1034.
• Keohane, R. O. (1975). International organization and the crisis of interdependence. International Organization, 29(2), 357–365.
• Keohane, R. O. (1985). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1971a). Transnational relations and world politics: Introduction. International Organization, 25(3), 329–349.
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (Eds.). (1972). Transnational relations and world politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1974). Transgovernmental relations and international organizations. World Politics, 27(1), 39–62.
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977, 2001). Power and interdependence. New York & London: Longman.
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1997). Interdependence in world politics. In G. T. Crane & A. Amawi (Eds.), The theoretical evolution of international political economy: A reader (pp. 122–132). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Khagram, S., Riker, J. V., & Sikkink, K. (Eds.). (2002). Restructuring world politics: Transnational social movements, networks, and norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Koops, J., & Biermann, R. (2015). Inter-organizationalism in international relations: Directions for future research. In R. Biermann & J. Koops (Eds.), Palgrave handbook on inter-organizational relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Krasner, S. (1982). Regimes and the limits of realism: Regimes as autonomous variables. International Organization, 36(2), 497–510.
• Krasner, S. (Ed.). (1983b). International regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Kriesberg, L. (1972). International nongovernmental organizations and transnational integration. International Interactions, 11, 520–525.
• Lasswell, H. (1971). A preview of the policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
• Levine, S., & White, P. E. (1961). Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, 583–601.
• Lindberg, L., & Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Lipson, M. (2015). Organiaztion theory and international organizations. In R. Biermann & J. Koops (Eds.), Palgrave handbook on inter-organizational relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Mansbach, R. W., Ferguson, Y., & Lampert, D. (1976). The web of world politics: Non-state actors in the global System. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Marx, K. (1867, 1906). Capital: A critique of political economy. New York: The Modern Library.
• Michalak, S. J. (1979a). The implications of interdependence for international stratification. Politics & Policy, 7(1), 147–156.
• Milner, H. (2006). The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: A critique. In F. Kratochwil & E. D. Mansfield (Eds.), International organization and global governance: A reader, 2d ed. (pp. 4–19). New York: Pearson-Longman.
• Mitrany, D. (1944). A working peace system: An argument for the functional development of international organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
• Morse, E. L. (1976). Modernization and the transformation of international relations. New York: Free Press.
• Nye, J. S. (Ed.). (1968). International regionalism. Boston: Little, Brown.
• Nye, J. S. (1971b). Peace in parts: Integration and conflict in regional organization. Boston: Little, Brown.
• O’Neal, J. R., Russett, B., & Berbaum, M. L. (2003). Causes of peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885–1992. International Studies Quarterly, 47(3), 371–393.
• Parsons, T. (1951). Toward a general theory of action. New York: Harper & Row.
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
• Puchala, D. J., & Hopkins R. (1983). International regimes: Lessons from inductive analysis. In S. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 61–91). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Ritchie, C. (1995). Coordinate? Cooperate? Harmonize? NGO policy and operational coalitions. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 513–524.
• Rosecrance, R., Alexandroff, A., Koehler, W., Kroll, J., Laqueur, S., & Stocker, J. (1977). Whither Interdependence? International Organization, 31(3), 425–471.
• Rosenau, J. N. (1990). Turbulence in world politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Distant proximities: Dynamics beyond globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Ruggie, J. G. (1975). International responses to technology: Concepts and trends. International Organization, 29(3), 557–583.
• Ruggie, J. G. (Ed.). (1983b). The antinomies of interdependence: National welfare and the international division of labor. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Schmitter, P. C. (1970). A revised theory of regional integration. International Organization, 24(4), 836–868.
• Skjelsbaek, K. (1971). The growth of international non-governmental organization in the twentieth century. International Organization, 25(3), 520–552.
• Smith, A. (1776, 2005). Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. College Station, PA: Penn State Electronic Publication.
• Stone, D. (2004). Knowledge networks and global policy. In D. Stone & S. Maxwell (Eds.), Global knowledge networks and international development: Bridges across boundaries (pp. 89–105). London: Routledge.
• Strange, S. (1983). Cave! Hic dragones: A critique of regimes analysis. In S. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 337–354). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Tetreault, M. A. (1980). Measuring interdependence. International Organization, 34(3), 429–443.
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Vetterlein, A., & Moschella, M. (2013). International organizations and organizational fields: Explaining policy change in the IMF. European Political Science Review, FirstView, 1–23.
• Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Waltz, K. (1970). The myth of national interdependence. In C. Kindleberger (Ed.), The international corporation (pp. 205–223). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Weiss, T., & Gordenker, L. (Eds.). (1996). NGOs, the United Nations, and global governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
• Witte, J. M., Reinicke, W. H., & Benner, T. (2003). Global public policy networks: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. Brookings Review, 21(2), 18–21.
• Wolfers, A. (1962). Discord and collaboration: Essays on international politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Young, O. R. (1969). Interdependence in world politics. International Journal, 24(4), 726–750.
• Young, O. R. (1980). International regimes: Problems of concept formation. World Politics, 32(2), 331–356.
• Young, O. R. (1982b). Resource regimes: Natural resources and social institutions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Young, O. (1989). Interdependence in World Politics. International Journal, 24(Autumn), 726–750.
• Young, O. R. (1999). Regime theory: Past, present, and future. In O. R. Young (Ed.), Governance in world affairs (pp. 189–216). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.