Postcolonialism

Resources

See Also

Further Reading

• Acharya, A. (2011). Dialogue and discovery: In search of international relations theories beyond the West. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 619–637.
• Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2010). Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London: Routledge.
• Aching, G. (2011). On colonial modernity: Civilization versus sovereignty in Cuba, c. 1840. In R. Shilliam (Ed.), International relations and non-Western thought: Imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity (pp. 29–46). London: Routledge.
• Adib-Moghaddam, A. (2011). A metahistory of the clash of civilisations: Us and them beyond Orientalism. London: C. Hurst.
• Ahluwalia, P. (2005). Out of Africa: Post-structuralism’s colonial roots. Postcolonial Studies, 8(2), 137–154.
• Ahmad, A. (1995). The politics of literary postcoloniality. Race & Class, 36(3), 1–20.
• Appiah, K. A. (1996). Is the post in postmodernism the post in postcolonialism? In P. Mongia (Ed.), Contemporary postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 55–71). London: St Martin’s.
• Ayoob, M. (1998). Subaltern realism: International relations theory meets the Third World. In S. G. Neuman (Ed.), International relations theory and the Third World (pp. 31–54). New York: St. Martin’s.
• Ayoob, M. (2002). Inequality and theorizing in international relations: The case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review, 4(3), 27–48.
• al-Azm, S. (1980). Orientalism and Orientalism in reverse. Khamsin, 8, 5–26.
• Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
• Bhambra, G. K. (2007). Rethinking modernity: Postcolonialism and the sociological imagination. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Connected sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Blaut, J. M. (1993). The colonizer’s model of the world: Geographical diffusionism and Eurocentric history. New York: Guilford.
• Brennan, T. (2014, September-October). Subaltern stakes. New Left Review, 89, 67–87.
• Brown, C. (1994). “Turtles all the way down”: Anti-foundationalism, critical theory and international relations. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 23(2), 213–236.
• Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2015). The global transformation: History, modernity and the making of international relations. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
• Castro Varela, M. d., & Dhawan, N. (2015). Postkoloniale Theorie: Eine Kritische Einführung. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
• Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Chan, S., & Moore, C. (Eds.). (2009). Approaches to international relations: Vol. 4. Non-Western approaches to international relations. London: SAGE.
• Chaturvedi, V. (Ed.). (2012). Mapping subaltern studies and the postcolonial. London: Verso.
• Chibber, V. (2013). Postcolonial theory and the specter of capital. London: Verso.
• Chimni, B. S. (2006). Retrieving “other” visions of the future: Sri Aurobindo and the ideal of human unity. In B. Gruffydd Jones (Ed.), Decolonizing international relations (pp. 197–217). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Conrad, S., & Randeria, S. (2002). Einleitung. Geteilte Geschichten—Europa in einer postkolonialen Welt. In S. Conrad & S. Randeria (Eds.), Jenseits des Eurozentrismus: Postkoloniale Perspektiven in den Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften (pp. 9–50). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
• Coronil, F. (2008). Elephants in the Americas? Latin American postcolonial studies and global decolonization. In M. Moraña, E. D. Dussel, & C. A. Jáuregui (Eds.), Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate (pp. 396–416). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Cox, R. W. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium, 12(2), 162–177.
• Dabashi, H. (2012). The Arab Spring: The end of postcolonialism. London: Zed.
• Darby, P. (2004). Pursuing the political: A postcolonial rethinking of relations international. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 33(1), 1–32.
• Dirlik, A. (1994). The postcolonial aura: Third World criticism in the age of global capitalism. Critical Inquiry, 20(2), 328–356.
• Dirlik, A. (2002). Rethinking colonialism: Globalization, postcolonialism, and the nation. Interventions, 4(3), 428–448.
• Doty, R. L. (1997). Imperial encounters: The politics of representation in North-South relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Epstein, C. (Ed.). (2017). Against international relations norms: postcolonial perspectives. London: Routledge.
• Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the Earth. Preface by Jean-Paul Sartre. New York: Grove.
• Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove.
• Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
• Gruffydd Jones, B. (2006). Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Guha, R. (1982). Subaltern studies: Writings on South Asian history and society. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
• Guha, R., & Spivak, G. C. (1988). Selected subaltern studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hall, M., & Hobson, J. M. (2010). Liberal international theory: Eurocentric but not always imperialist? International Theory, 2(2), 210–245.
• Halliday, F. (2005). The Middle East in international relations: Power, politics and ideology. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Hinnebusch, R. (2013). The politics of identity in Middle East international relations. In L. Fawcett (Ed.), International relations of the Middle East (3d ed., pp. 148–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hobson, J. A. (1902). Imperialism: A study. New York: James Pott.
• Hobson, J. M. (2004). The Eastern origins of Western civilization. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
• Hobson, J. M. (2007). Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a post-racist critical IR. Review of International Studies, 33(S1), 91–116.
• Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
• Huggan, G. (Ed.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of postcolonial studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Inayatullah, N., & Blaney, D. L. (2004). International relations and the problem of difference. New York: Routledge.
• Jabri, V. (2013). The postcolonial subject: Claiming politics/governing others in late modernity. London: Routledge.
• Jabri, V. (2014). Disarming norms: Postcolonial agency and the constitution of the international. International Theory, 6(2), 372–390.
• Kayaoglu, T. (2010). Westphalian Eurocentrism in international relations theory. International Studies Review, 12(2), 193–217.
• Kohn, M., & McBride, K. D. (2011). Political theories of decolonization: Postcolonialism and the problem of foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Krishna, S. (2001). Race, amnesia, and the education of international relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(4), 401–424.
• Laffey, M., & Weldes, J. (2008). Decolonizing the Cuban Missile Crisis. International Studies Quarterly, 52(3), 555–577.
• Lenin, V. I. (2010). Imperialism: The highest stage of capitalism. London: Penguin.
• Ling, L. H. M. (2002). Postcolonial international relations: Conquest and desire between Asia and the West. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave.
• Ling, L. H. M. (2014a). Decolonizing the international: Towards multiple emotional worlds. International Theory, 6(3), 579–583.
• Ling, L. H. M. (2014b). The Dao of world politics: Towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. London: Routledge.
• Loomba, A. (1998). Colonialism/postcolonialism. London: Routledge.
• Mallon, F. E. (1994). The promise and dilemma of subaltern studies: Perspectives from Latin American history. American Historical Review, 99(5), 1491–1515.
• Matin, K. (2013). Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), 353–377.
• Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.
• McClintock, A. (1992). The angel of progress: Pitfalls of the term “post-colonialism.” Social Text, (31/32), 84–98.
• Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Mignolo, W. (2005). The idea of Latin America. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Mignolo, W. D. (1993). Colonial and postcolonial discourse: Cultural critique or academic colonialism? Latin American Research Review, 28(3), 120–134.
• Mignolo, W. D. (2002). The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57–96.
• Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking—the rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514.
• Moore-Gilbert, B. (1997). Postcolonial theory: contexts, practices, politics. London, New York: Verso.
• Nkrumah, K. (1966). Neo-colonialism: The last stage of imperialism. New York: International Publishers.
• Pahuja, S. (2011). Decolonising international law: Development, economic growth, and the politics of universality. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
• Pasha, M. K. (2011). Western nihilism and dialogue: Prelude to an uncanny encounter in international relations. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 683–700.
• Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232.
• Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178.
• Rattansi, A. (1997). Postcolonialism and its discontents. Economy and Society, 26(4), 480–500.
• Sabaratnam, M. (2011). IR in dialogue . . . but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 781–803.
• Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
• Said, E. W. (1994). Culture and imperialism. London: Vintage.
• Said, E. W. (2003). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin.
• Sajed, A. (2013). Postcolonial encounters in international relations: The politics of transgression in the Maghreb. London: Routledge.
• Scott, D. (1999). Refashioning futures: Criticism after postcoloniality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Sen, S. (2002). Uncertain dominance: The colonial state and its contradictions (with notes on the history of early British India). Nepantla: Views from the South, 3(2), 391–406.
• Seth, S. (2013). Postcolonial theory and international relations: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.
• Shahi, D., & Ascione, G. (2015) Rethinking the absence of post-Western international relations theory in India: “Advaitic monism” as an alternative epistemological resource. European Journal of International Relations, 22(2), 313–334.
• Shani, G. (2007). “Provincializing” critical theory: Islam, Sikhism and international relations theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(3), 417–433.
• Shani, G. (2008). Toward a post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and critical international relations theory. International Studies Review, 10(4), 722–734.
• Shilliam, R. (2011b). The perilous but unavoidable terrain of the non-West. In R. Shilliam (Ed.), International relations and non-Western thought: Imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity (pp. 12–26). London: Routledge.
• Shilliam, R. (2015). The black Pacific: Anti-colonial struggles and oceanic connections. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Shilliam, R. (Ed.). (2011a). International relations and non-Western thought: Imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. London: Routledge.
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
• Sylvester, C. (1999). Development studies and postcolonial studies: Disparate tales of the “Third World.” Third World Quarterly, 20(4), 703–721.
• Tickner, A. B. (2003). Hearing Latin American voices in international relations studies. International Studies Perspectives, 4(4), 325–350.
• Tickner, A. B. (2013). Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 627–646.
• Tickner, A. B., & Wæver, O. (Eds.). (2009). International relations scholarship around the world. New York: Routledge.
• Young, R. J. C. (1995). Colonial desire: Hybridity in theory, culture, and race. London: Routledge.
• Young, R. J. C. (1998). Editorial: Ideologies of the postcolonial. Interventions, 1(1), 4–8.
• Young, R. J. C. (2001). Postcolonialism: An historical introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Zarakol, A. (2011). After defeat: How the East learned to live with the West. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.