International trade law Part 16

International trade law Part 16

 

189

[Articles] THE ‘HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH’ ADVOCATED BY THE UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND BY THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION:: IS IT RELEVANT FOR WTO LAW AND POLICY?
Petersmann, E.-U.
Journal of International Economic Law
Volume 7, Number 3, 2004

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

The today universal recognition of ‘inalienable’ human rights implies that the legitimacy and legality of all government measures, including rules and decisions of intergovernmental organizations, depend also on their respect for human rights as defined in national Constitutions and international law. This contribution argues that the universal human rights obligations of every Member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) pursue objectives (like protection of personal autonomy, freedom of choice, legal security) that complement those of liberal trade and may be legally relevant context for the interpretation of WTO rules (chapters I-II). The human rights approach to international trade advocated by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (chapter III) could, like the 1996 WTO and 1998 ILO Declarations on core labor standards (chapter IV), promote synergies between human rights law and GATT/WTO law. The ‘basic rights approach’ to trade liberalization in European integration (chapter V), as well as the GATT-, WTO- and EC dispute settlement jurisprudence (chapter VI) confirm that, on the level of principles, human rights and liberal trade rules do not conflict with each other. The emerging ‘human right to democratic governance’ requires, however, more effective parliamentary involvement, citizen participation, and ‘deliberative democracy’ in WTO matters (chapter VII). A WTO Declaration (1) confirming the commitment of WTO Members to respect their existing human rights obligations in all policy areas; (2) supporting the progressive development of human rights through the competent UN and other human rights bodies; and (3) welcoming the UN initiatives for harnessing the complementarity of WTO rules and human rights for welfare-increasing cooperation among free citizens, could enhance the ‘input-legitimacy’ as well as the ‘output-legitimacy’of WTO negotiations without creating new WTO obligations or new WTO competencies. The limited mandate of the WTO, however, and the divergent human rights concepts and diverse constitutional traditions in WTO member countries, make a consensus among WTO Members on such a Declaration unlikely. Even though the WTO should leave the interpretation, monitoring, and progressive development of human rights to specialized human rights bodies outside the WTO, WTO dispute settlement bodies may be legally required to address arguments that human rights may be relevant legal context for interpreting WTO rules (chapter VIII).

190

[Articles] THE WTO AND COSMOPOLITICS
Charnovitz, S.
Journal of International Economic Law
Volume 7, Number 3, 2004

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

The relationship of the WTO to the international community and to its individual denizens continues to be a contentious topic in Trade law and policy. In 2001, European Commissioner for Trade Pascal Lamy suggested the need for ‘cosmopolitics’ in global governance in order to improve decision-making and enhance legitimacy. In this article, Steve Charnovitz shows how the WTO already engages in various practices of cosmopolitics, despite the continuing pull of the mantra that only Members are of relevance within the WTO. Following this review of current practice, the article points several additional ways in which the WTO could boost transparency and deepen public participation.

191

Reputational Fallacies in International Law: A Comparative Review of United States and Canadian Trade Actions
Colin B. Picker
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Volume 30, Number 1, 2004 p.67

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

192

SPECIAL ISSUE: Protection of Intellectual Property and Access to Plant Genetic Resources
Bio-Science Law Review
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2004/2005

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

This is a special issue of Bio-Science Law Review which carries the edited papers of the ISF International Seminar held in Berlin in 2004. This collection of papers is divided into three sections – the evolution of plant breeding techniques – the evolution of the international legal environment – and balancing Access and Protection: Views of Stakeholders The International Seed Federation represents the mainstream of seed trade and the plant breeding community in the world. It is a non-governmental, non-profit organization representing the seed industry. With members spread over 68 developed and developing countries on all continents, ISF serves as an international forum where issues of interest to the seed industry are discussed. ISF promotes the establishment and protection of intellectual property rights for seeds, plant varieties and associated technologies, which follow from research investments in plant breeding, plant biotechnology, seed technology and related subjects. It facilitates the marketing of planting seeds and other reproductive materials by publishing rules for trading seed and licensing technology. These rules clarify and standardize contractual relations between buyers and sellers at the international level. The Settlement of Disputes is also provided for through mediation, conciliation and/or arbitration. Arbitration Chambers exist in many ISF member countries. For more information on ISF see www.worldseed.org

 

Conclusion

Notes

See Also

References and Further Reading

About the Author/s and Reviewer/s

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

Constitutions, International trade law, Settlement of Disputes, Trade law.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *