International Organizations History

International Organization: Historical Development of International Organizations

Introduction to International Organizations History

Historically, international organizations and regimes have reflected the interests of the world’s most powerful nations, or great powers. Many international organizations and regimes were established during times of global hegemony-that is, when one nation has predominated in international power. These periods have often followed a major war among the great powers. Today’s international organizations-such as the UN, the Organization of American States (OAS), and the World Bank-were created after World War II ended in 1945, when the United States was powerful enough to create rules and institutions that other countries would follow.

Although rooted in power, international organizations and regimes generally serve the interests of most participating nations and usually endure even when hegemony wanes. Most countries share mutual interests, yet find it hard to coordinate their actions for mutual benefit because of the lack of a central authority. Nations also face the temptation to bend the rules in their own favor. For example, it is in everyone’s interest to halt production of chemicals that damage the earth’s ozone layer. However, a country can save money by continuing to use those chemicals.

The coordination of efforts to write new rules and monitor them requires an international organization. For example, the United Nations Environment Program helped countries negotiate a treaty to stop producing ozone-destroying chemicals. Thus, nations find it useful to give international organizations some power to enforce rules. Most countries follow the rules most of the time.

International organizations are also able to make countries aware of the need to act on emerging issues. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations were instrumental in focusing attention on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) as a global crisis.

In the 18th century, German philosopher Immanuel Kant and French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau broadly outlined the concept of a global federation of countries resembling today’s UN. Nations joined the first IGOs in the 19th century. These were practical organizations through which nations managed specific issues, such as international mail service and control of traffic on European rivers. Such organizations proliferated in the 20th century to cover a wide variety of specific issues. At the same time, the scope of international organizations expanded, culminating with the creation of the League of Nations in 1920.

The development of European regional organizations after World War II ended in 1945 mirrored the growth of IGOs historically, in that narrowly focused organizations preceded broader and more encompassing international institutions. The European Coal and Steel Community, predecessor of the European Union, coordinated coal and steel production. Today, the European Commission, executive agency of the European Union, enforces regulations concerning labor, the environment, agriculture, and a host of other issues that affect the daily lives of virtually every citizen in Europe.

NGOs similarly developed from the need to coordinate specific, narrowly defined activities across national borders. Beginning in the 19th century, churches and professional and scientific occupational groups formed the first NGOs. The Red Cross was organized in 1863 to establish and monitor the laws of warfare. It was one of the first NGOs to actively work to change the behavior of states. Some political parties-notably communist parties in the early 20th century-organized internationally and began to function as NGOs. In the 20th century, specialized NGOs also sprang up in such areas as sports, business, tourism, and communication.

Between 1945 and 1995, the number of international organizations increased fivefold, reaching about 500 IGOs and 5,000 NGOs. By 2003, the number of international organizations increased fivefold again, to nearly 25,000-mostly due to the proliferation of NGOs made possible by new technologies such as the Internet. On average, a new NGO is created somewhere in the world every few days. This trend reflects the growing importance of international coordination for both governmental and private institutions in an interdependent world.” (1)

Resources

Notes and References

• Information about International Organizations History in the Encarta Online Encyclopedia

Further Reading

• Aggarwal, V. K., & Morrison, C. E. (Eds.). (1998). Asia-Pacific crossroads: Regime creation and the future of APEC. New York: Palgrave.
• Alston, P., & Megret, F. (Eds.). (2004). The United Nations and human rights: A critical appraisal (2d ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Angell, N. (1912). The great illusion: A study of relations of military power in nations to their economic and social advantage. London: William Heinemann.
• Auvachez, E. (2009). Supranational citizenship building and the United Nations: Is the UN engaged in a “citizenation” process? Global Governance, 15(1), 43–66.
• Bahador, B. (2007). The CNN effect in action: How the news media pushed the West toward war in Kosovo. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Banerjee, D., & Colucci, M. (2007). Labour, globalization and the state: Workers, women and migrants confront neoliberalism. New York: Routledge.
• Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2014). The globalization of world politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Berry, C. (2009). Imperfect Union: Representation and Taxation in Multilevel Governments. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
• Bird, G. (2005). IMF lending to developing countries. New York: Routledge.
• Blom-Hansen, J. (2011). The EU comitology system in theory and practice: Keeping an eye on the commission? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bosch, M. (1998). Votes in the UN General Assembly. The Hague: Kluwer.
• Brechin, S. R. (1977). Planting trees in the developing world: A sociology of international organizations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2014). Seeing like an International Organization. London: Routledge.
• Bull, H. (1982). Civilian power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 21(2), 149–170.
• Cameron, I. (2013). EU sanctions: Law and policy issues concerning restrictive measures. Cambridge, U.K.: Intersentia.
• Cason, J. W. (2011). The political economy of integration: The experience of Mercosur. New York: Routledge.
• Chesterman, S. (Ed.). (2007). Secretary or general? The UN Secretary-General in world politics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
• Chossudowsky, M. (1998). The globalisation of poverty: Impacts of IMF and World Bank reforms. London: Zed Books.
• Cini, M., & Perez-Solorzano Borragan, N. (2010). European Union politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Claude, I. L. (1968). The changing United Nations. New York: Random House.
• Colgan, J. D., & Van de Graaf, T. (2012). Mechanisms of informal governance: Evidence from the IEA. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18, 455–481.
• Cortright, D., & Lopez, G. A. (2002). Sanctions and the search for security: Challenges to UN action. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
• Dashwood, A., & Maresceau, M. (2008). Law and practice of EU external relations: Salient features of a changing landscape. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Dedring, J. (2008). United Nations Security Council in the 1990s: Resurgence and renewal. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Diehl, P. F., & Druckman, D. (2010). Evaluating peace operations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
• Doyle, M. W., Johnstone, I., & Orr, R. C. (1997). Keeping the peace: Multidimensional UN operations in Cambodia and El Salvador. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Dunoff, J. L., & Trachtman, J. P. (2011). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, international law, and global governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
• Eggermont, F. (2012). The changing role of the European Council in the institutional framework of the European Union: Consequences for the European integration process. Cambridge, U.K.: Intersentia.
• Engel, U., & Gomes Porto, J. (2013). Towards an African peace and security regime: Continental embeddedness, Transnational linkages, strategic relevance. Farnham, University of Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate.
• Farrall, J., & Robertstein, K. (2009). Sanctions, accountability, and governance in a globalized world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Ficsor, M. (2002). The law of copyright and the Internet: The 1996 WIPO treaties, their interpretation, and implementation. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Foret, F., & Rittelmeyer, Y.-S. (2014). The European Council and European governance: The commanding heights of the EU. New York: Routledge.
• Friedrich, C. L. (1968). Trends of federalism in theory and practice. New York: Praeger.
• Galbreath, D. (2007). Organisation for security and co-operation in Europe. London: Taylor & Francis.
• Georgakakis, D., & Rowell, J. (2013). The field of Eurocracy: Mapping EU actors and professionals. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Giumelli, F. (2013). How EU sanctions work: A new narrative. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
• Gordenker, L. (2010). The UN Secretary-General and Secretariat. New York: Routledge.
• Gross, E. (2009). The Europeanization of national foreign policy: Continuity and change in European crisis management. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hakimdavar, G. (2014). A strategic understanding of UN economic sanctions: International relations, law, and development. New York: Routledge.
• Hassler, S. (2013). Reforming the UN Security Council Membership: The Illusion of Representativeness. New York: Routledge.
• Hearn, R. (1999). UN peacekeeping in action: The Namibian experience. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
• Herz, M. (2011). The Organization of American States (OAS): Global governance away from the media. New York: Routledge.
• Hix, S., Noury, A., & Roland, G. (2007). Democratic politics in the European Parliament. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Horwitz, B. (2010). The transformation of the Organization of American States: A multilateral framework for regional governance. New York: Anthem Press.
• Hurd, I. (2007). After anarchy: Legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Jackson, J. (2006). Sovereignty, the WTO, and changing fundamentals of international law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• James, A. (1990). Peacekeeping in international politics. London: Macmillan.
• Johnstone, I (2011). The power of deliberation: International law, politics and organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Jordan, R. S., Archer, C., Granger, G. P., & Ordes, K. (2001). International organizations: A comparative approach to the management of cooperation. New York: Praeger.
• Kapur, D., Lewis, J. P., & Webb, R. C. (Eds.). (1997b). The World Bank: Its first half century: Vol. 2, Perspectives. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
• Kayaoglu, T. (2015). The Organization of Islamic Cooperation. New York: Routledge.
• Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Kille, K. J. (Ed.). (2007). The UN Secretary-General and moral authority. Ethics and religion in international leadership. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
• Kleine, M. (2013). Informal governance in the European Union: How governments make international organizations work. New York: Cornell University Press.
• Kolb, M. (2013). The European Union and the Council of Europe. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Krasner, S. D. (1983). International regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Kronsell, A., & Svedberg, E. (Eds.). (2012). Making gender, making war: Violence, military and peacekeeping practices. New York: Routledge.
• Laatikainen, K. V., & Smith, K. E. (2006). The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting multilateralisms. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Lauterpacht, H. E. (Ed.). (1934). The development of international law by the permanent court of international justice. London: Longman.
• Leonard, L. L. (1951). International organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Lyall, F. (2011). International communications: The International Telecommunication Union and the Universal Postal Union. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
• MacKenzie, D. (2010b). ICAO: A history of the International Civil Aviation Organization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Marshall, K. (2007). The World Bank. From reconstruction to development to equity. New York: Routledge.
• Masson-Matthee, M. D. (2007). The Codex Alimentarius Commission and its standards. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press.
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994–1995). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.
• Michta, A. A. (2006). The limits of alliance: The U.S., NATO, and the EU in north and central Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Mohammed, A. (2010). African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Challenges and opportunities in protecting human and peoples’ rights in Africa. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
• Mu–oz Mosquera, B. (2011). Democratization through UN Peacekeeping Operations? Peacekeeping regimes. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Wolf Legal.
• Nesi, G. (2007). International cooperation in counter-terrorism: The United Nations and regional organizations in the fight against terrorism. Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate.
• Niemann, A. (2000). Explaining decisions in the European Union. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
• Novack, S. (2013). The silence of ministers: Consensus and blame avoidance in the Council of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1091–1107.
• Olonisakin, F. (2000). Reinventing peacekeeping in Africa: Conceptual and legal issues in ECOMOG Operations. Boston: Kluwer law International
• Paris, R., & Sisk, T. D. (2009). The dilemmas of statebuilding: Confronting the contradictions of postwar peace operations. New York: Routledge.
• Pease, K.-K. (2008). International organizations: Perspectives on governance in the 21st century (3d ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.
• Pisanello, D. (2014). Chemistry of foods: EU legal and regulatory approaches. Cham, Germany: Springer.
• Portela, C. (2010). European Union sanctions and foreign policy: When and why do they work? New York: Routledge.
• Ramcharan, B. G. (2008b). Contemporary human rights ideas. New York: Routledge.
• Reinalda, B. (2013). Routledge handbook of international organization. London: Routledge.
• Reis, D., & Kahn, P. (2009). The World Trade Organization. New York: Chelsea House.
• Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (Eds.). (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Roberts, A., & Zaum, D. (2008). Selective security: War and the United Nations Security Council since 1945. Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge.
• Rothstein, R. L. (1979). Global dialogue: UNCTAD and the quest for a new international economic order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Russett, B., & Kim, S. Y. (1996). The new politics of voting alignments in the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization, 50(4), 629–652.
• Salem, A. A. (2008). International relations theories and organizations: Realism, constructivism, and collective security in the League of Arab States. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller.
• Savage, J. (1989). The politics of international telecommunication regulation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Schmidt, S. K., & Kelemen, R. D. (2013). The power of the European Court of Justice. New York: Routledge.
• Seib, P. M. (2008). The Al Jazeera effect: How the new global media are reshaping world politics. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
• Shelton, D. (2006). Remedies in international human rights law. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Simmonds, K. R. (1994). The International Maritime Organization. London: Simmonds & Hill.
• Smith, C. B. (2005). Politics and process at the United Nations: The global dance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
• Ssenyonjo, M. (2012). The African regional human rights system: 30 years after the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Boston: Maetinus Nijhoff.
• Stone, R. (2001). *Lending credibility: The International Monetary Fund and the post-communist transition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Synge, R. (1997). Mozambique: UN peacekeeping in action, 1992–94. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
• Tarns, C. J., & Tzanakopoulos, A. (2012). The settlement of international disputes: Basic documents. Oxford: Hart.
• Thompson, A., & Snidal, D. (1999). International organizations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Toje, A. (2008a). The consensus–expectations gap: Explaining Europe’s ineffective foreign policy. Security Dialogues, 39(1), 121–141.
• Union of International Associations. (2014).Yearbook of International Organizations, 2014–2015 (Vol. 5, 51st ed.). Brussels: Union of International Associations.
• Voigt, C. (2009). Sustainable development as a principle of international law: Resolving conflicts between climate measures and WTO law. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinius Nijhoff.
• Wallace, C., & Strømsnes, K. (Eds.). (2008). European identities. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 9(4), 378–380.
• Ward, M. (2004). Quantifying the world: UN ideas and statistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Weiss, T. G., Carayannis, T., & Jolly, R. (2009). The “third” United Nations. Global Governance, 15(1), 123–142.
• Weller, P., & Xu, Y.-C. (Eds.). (2015). Politics of international organizations. New York: Routledge.
• Wetzel, J. E. (2011). The EU as a “global player” in human rights? New York: Routledge.
• Whitfield, T. (2007). Friends indeed? The United Nations, groups of friends, and the resolution of conflict. Washington DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
• Wong, R., & Hill, C. (2011). National and European foreign policy: Towards Europeanization. New York: Routledge.
• Yago, K. (2012). The financial history of the bank for international settlements. New York: Routledge.
• Zaum, D. (2013). Legitimating international organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Zyczkowski, K., & Cichocki, M. A. (2010). Institutional design and voting power in the European Union. Burlingont, VT: Ashgate.