International Criminal Court Part 32

International Criminal Court Part 32

 

601

The Assembly of States Parties and the Institutional Framework of the International Criminal Court
Daryl A. Mundis
American Journal of International Law
Volume 97, Number 1, January 2003 p.132

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

602

The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (R.S. LEE)
Gall A. Partin
International Journal of Legal Information
Volume 31, Number 1, Spring 2003 p.117

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

603

The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law: Justice for the New Millennium (L.N. SADAT)
Mirela Roznovschi
International Journal of Legal Information
Volume 31, Number 1, Spring 2003 p.120

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

604

Rethinking Aggression as a Crime and Formulating Its Elements: The Final Work-Product of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court
Roger S. Clark
Leiden Journal of International Law
Volume 15, Number 4, December 2002 p.859-890

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

605

SOME TROUBLING ELEMENTS IN THE TREATY LANGUAGE OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
Catherine R. Blanchet
Michigan Journal of International Law
Volume 24, Number 2, Winter 2003 p.647

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

606

The Self-Defeating International Criminal Court
Jack Goldsmith
University of Chicago Law Review
Volume 70, Number 1, Winter 2003 p.89

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

607

“THE SUPREME . . . CRIME”AND ITS ORIGINS: THE LAST LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF THE CRIME OF AGGRESSIVE WAR
Jonathan A. Bush
Columbia Law Review
Volume 102, Number 8, December 2002 p.2324

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

A major element of the Nuremberg and Tokyo war crimes trials (1945-1949) was the notion of individual criminal liability for planning starting, or waging aggressive war. That notion was largely new, and had been adopted at American insistence shortly before, based on the work of William C. Chanler, a largely forgotten Wall Street lawyer. The following essay reprints the newly discovered contemporaneous correspondence between Chanler and Sheldon Glueck, a leading Harvard criminologist of the day whose intellectual contribution to Nuremberg has long been known, as well as Chanler’s later cover letters to General Telford Taylor, chief prosecutor at the later Nuremberg trials (1946-1949) and Professor Yasuaki Onuma, a legal scholar at the University of Tokyo. Because of the importance of Chanler in developing the new notion of liability, his correspondence with Glueck and the letters to Taylor and Onuma are the closest we are likely to have to a legislative history of what the Nuremberg tribunal famously called “the supreme international crime.”In view of the inclusion of aggressive war as a crime within the future jurisdiction of the new International Criminal Court, the letters have significance for both the legal history of Nuremberg and the development of Hague jurisprudence.

608

Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes: Nullum Crimen Sine Lege and the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court by Machteld Boot
GUEN?à‹L METTR?UX
International Criminal Law Review
Volume 2, Number 4, 2002 p.423-427

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

609

The Meaning of the State Consent Precondition in Article 12(2) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Theoretical Analysis of the Source of International Criminal Jurisdiction
Mitsue Inazumi
Netherlands International Law Review
Volume 49, Issue 2, August 2002 p.159-193

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

610

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR DOMESTIC LAW AND NATIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING
Mark S. Ellis
Florida Journal of International Law
Volume 15, Number 2, Fall 2002 p.215

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

611

-2. VIII. 02 – Unilateral enforcement of immunity before the International Criminal Court (ICC) / American Servicemembers’ Protection Act (ASPA)
Human Rights Law Journal
Volume 23, Number 5-7, October 30, 2002 p.275

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

612

The International Criminal Court and the United States: Recent Legal and Policy Issues
C. Jayaraj
Indian Journal of International Law
Volume 42, Number 4, October-December 2002 p.489

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

613

Peace or Justice? Amnesties and the International Criminal Court
Diba Majzub
Melbourne Journal of International Law
Volume 3, Number 2, October 2002 p.247

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

614

SHOULD THE UNITED STATES JOIN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
Michael A. Newton
U.C. Davis Journal of International Law & Policy
Volume 9, Number 1, Fall 2002 p.35

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

615

SHOULD THE UNITED STATES JOIN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
David J. Scheffer
U.C. Davis Journal of International Law & Policy
Volume 9, Number 1, Fall 2002 p.45

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

616

THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: ARE THEY SUFFICIENT FOR THE PROPER FUNCTIONING OF THE COURT OR IS THERE STILL ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT?
Stuart Beresford
San Diego International Law Journal
Volume 3, 2002 p.83

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

Conclusion

Notes

See Also

References and Further Reading

About the Author/s and Reviewer/s

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

Columbia Law Review, International Criminal Court, International Criminal Law, Subject Matter Jurisdiction.


Posted

in

, ,

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *