International Criminal Court Part 3

International Criminal Court Part 3

 

42

International Criminal Law before the Supreme Court of Mexico
Javier Dondé Matute
International Criminal Law Review
Volume 10, Number 4, 2010 p.571

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

43

OF SHRINES, MEMORIALS AND MUSEUMS: USING THE International Criminal Court ‘S VICTIM REPARATION AND ASSISTANCE REGIME TO PROMOTE TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE
Frédéric Mégret
Buffalo Human Rights Law Review
Volume 16, 2010 p.1

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

44

The Review Conference on the Rome Statut e of the International Criminal Court, Kampala, Uganda, 31 May-11 June 2010
Roger S Clark
Australian International Law Journal
Volume 16, 2009 p.9

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

45

Victim Participation at the International Criminal Court
Matthew Gillett
Australian International Law Journal
Volume 16, 2009 p.29

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

46

A Call to Arms: Fundamental Dilemmas Confronting the Interpretation of Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Leena Grover
European Journal of International law
Volume 21, Number 3, August 2010 p.543-583

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

47

DEFINITELY MAYBE: THE OUTLOOK FOR U.S. RELATIONS WITH THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION
Stephen Eliot Smith
Florida Journal of International Law
Volume 22, Number 2, August 2010 p.155

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

48

DEFINING THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION: IS THERE AN ANSWER TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT’S DILEMMA?
Major Kari M. Fletcher, USAF
Air Force Law Review
Volume 65, 2010 p.229

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

49

The International Criminal Court, Article 79, and Transitional Justice: The Case for an Independent Trust Fund for Victims
Toni Dannenbaum
Wisconsin International Law Journal
Volume 28, Number 2, Summer 2010 p.234

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

50

The Palestinian Declaration and the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court
Alain Pellet
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Volume 8, Number 4, September 2010 p.981-999

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

51

Is Palestine A “State”? A Response to Professor John Quigley’s Article, “The Palestine Declaration To The International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue”
Robert Weston Ash
Rutgers Law Record
Volume 36, Issue 2, Fall 2009

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

52

The International Criminal Court: witness and victim protection and support, legal aid and family visits
Silvana Arbia
Commonwealth Law Bulletin
Volume 36, Number 3, 2010 p.519-528

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

53

THE PALESTINE DECLARATION TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: THE STATEHOOD ISSUE
John Quigley
Rutgers Law Record
Volume 35, Spring 2009

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

54

Stay of Proceedings Before the International Criminal Court
Rebecca Young
Edinburgh Student Law Review
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2009 p.105

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

55

Bringing Pirates to Justice: A Case for Including Piracy within the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court
Yvonne M. Dutton
Chicago Journal of International Law
Volume 11, Number 1, Summer 2010 p.197

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

56

CYBER WARFARE AND THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION: THE NEED FOR INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY ON TOMORROW’S BATTLEFIELD
Jonathan A. Ophardt
Duke Law & Technology Review
2010, Articles 1-12

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

2010 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 003 – As cyberspace matures, the international system faces a new challenge in confronting the use of force. Non-State actors continue to grow in importance, gaining the skill and the expertise necessary to wage asymmetric warfare using non-traditional weaponry that can create devastating real-world consequences. The international legal system must adapt to this battleground and provide workable mechanisms to hold aggressive actors accountable for their actions. The International Criminal Court–the only criminal tribunal in the world with global reach–holds significant promise in addressing this threat. The Assembly of State Parties should construct the definition of aggression to include these emerging challenges. By structuring the definition to confront the challenges of cyberspace–specifically non-State actors, the disaggregation of warfare, and new conceptions of territoriality–the International Criminal Court can become a viable framework of accountability for the wars of the twenty-first century.

 

Conclusion

Notes

See Also

References and Further Reading

About the Author/s and Reviewer/s

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

International Criminal Court, International Criminal Law, Piracy.


Posted

in

, ,

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *