International Criminal Court Part 28
532
-25.VI. 03 – Res. 1336(2003): Threats to the International Criminal Court
Human Rights Law Journal
Volume 24, Numbers 5-8, November 28, 2003 p.307
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
533
Advancing U.S. Interests with the International Criminal Court
Ambassador David J. Scheffer
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Volume 36, Number 5, November 2003 p.1567
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
534
Victims and the International Criminal Court: Three major issues
Sam Garkawe
International Criminal Law Review
Volume 3, Number 4, 2003 p.345-367
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
535
International Justice and the International Criminal Court-Between Sovereignty and the Rule of law , by Bruce Broomhill (Ed.); Judging Criminal Leaders – The Slow Erosion of Impunity, by Yves Beigbeder (Ed.)
GUÃ ‰NAÃ ‹L M?TTRAUX
International Criminal Law Review
Volume 3, Number 4, 2003 p.415-419
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
536
THE UNITED STATES MUST REMAIN STEADFASTLY OPPOSED TO THE ROME TREATY INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
Steven T. Voigt
Widener Law Journal
Volume 12, Number 3, 2003 p.619
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
537
Legalist Groundwork for the International Criminal Court: Commentaries on the Statute of the International Criminal Court
Andreas L. Paulus
European Journal of International law
Volume 14, Number 4, September 2003 p.843-860
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
538
Compounding the Countermajoritarian Difficulty Through “Plaintiff’s Diplomacy “: Can the International Criminal Court Provide a Solution?
John B. Fowles
Brigham Young University Law Review
Volume 2003, Number 3 p.1129
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
539
The International Criminal Court and the Future of Legal Accountability
William W. Burke-White
ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law
Volume 10, Number 1, Fall 2003 p.195
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
540
Judging Global Justice: Assessing the International Criminal Court
Diane F. Orentlicher
Wisconsin International Law Journal
Volume 21, Number 3, Fall 2003 p.495
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
541
Why I Support the International Criminal Court
Patricia M. Wald
Wisconsin International Law Journal
Volume 21, Number 3, Fall 2003 p.513
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
542
Accountability for International Crimes: the Synergy Between the International Criminal Court and Alternative Remedies
Beth Stephens
Wisconsin International Law Journal
Volume 21, Number 3, Fall 2003 p.527
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
543
Summer in Rome, Spring in the Hague, Winter in Washington? U.S. Policy Towards the International Criminal Court
Leila Nadya Sadat
Wisconsin International Law Journal
Volume 21, Number 3, Fall 2003 p.557
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
544
Restoring U.S. Engagement with the International Criminal Court
David Scheffer
Wisconsin International Law Journal
Volume 21, Number 3, Fall 2003 p.599
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
545
TO KEEP YOU IS NO GAIN, TO KILL YOU IS NO LOSS-SECURING JUSTICE THROUGH THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
Talitha Gray
Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law
Volume 20, Number 3, Fall 2003 p.645
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
While the Holocaust is recognized worldwide as the ultimate example of man’s inhumanity toward his fellow man, seventeen separate genocides of comparable magnitude have been perpetuated since 1950 and have gone relatively unnoticed by the international community. In the rare instance where trials actually occurred, swift and impartial justice was notably absent. This Note enumerates the existence of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in recent history and argues that both victims and perpetrators deserve an impartial, independent, and prompt trial. An overview of the International Criminal Court is provided, as well as descriptions of the United States’ objections to the Court and the corresponding responses of the Court’s proponents. This Note further examines domestic courts in Cambodia and East Timor, the international tribunals in former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and the genocide in Iraq, as the basis for its conclusion that the International Criminal Court is the only feasible forum for trying future crimes of this magnitude.
546
THE EUROPEAN UNION v. THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION: ESTONIA’S CONFLICTING INTERESTS AS A PARTY TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
Barbi Appelquist
Hastings International and Comparative Law Review
Volume 27, Number 1, Fall 2003 p.77
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
The United States has requested that states party to the ICC sign agreements-referred to as Article 98 Treaties -exempting U.S. citizens from ICC jurisdiction. The EU has opposed Article 98 Treaties on the grounds that they threaten the legitimacy of the ICC. This note evaluates the conflicting political pressure exerted on Estonia to either sign or refrain from signing an Article 98 treaty. Part One summarizes the theory of transplantation and how Estonia’s relationships with the EU, NATO and the ICC have affected Estonia’s international legal obligations and diplomatic options. Part Two analyzes Estonia’s relations with the United States, NATO and the EU. Part Three evaluates the positions of Estonia, the United States and the EU in relation to the ICC. Part Four identifies and analyzes U.S. and EU interpretations of Article 98 and concludes with a discussion as to how Estonia could solve its Article 98 problem.
Conclusion
Notes
See Also
References and Further Reading
About the Author/s and Reviewer/s
Author: international
Mentioned in these Entries
Diplomacy, International Criminal Court, International Criminal Law, Rule of law, Treaties.
Leave a Reply