International copyright Part 11

International copyright Part 11

 

90

From Itar-Tass to Films by Jove: The Conflict of Laws Revolution in International copyright
Anna Tydniouk
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Volume 29, Number 2, 2004 p.897

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

91

THE UNITED STATES AND INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAW: FROM BERNE TO ELDRED
William Patty
Houston Law Review
Volume 40, Number 3, Symposium 2003 p.749

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

92

BURN BERNE: WHY THE LEADING INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT CONVENTION MUST BE REPEALED
Alan Story
Houston Law Review
Volume 40, Number 3, Symposium 2003 p.763

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

93

Eldred v. Ashcroft: International Influences and the Outer Limits of the Copyright Clause
Shiloh A. Daum
North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation
Volume 29, Number 1, Fall 2003 p.129

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

94

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components: Enjoining Proper Usage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s Anti-Circumvention Provisions
Natalie Bajalcaliev
North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology
Volume 5, Issue 1, Fall 2003 p.101

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

95

Harmony or Discord? The Pressure Toward Conformity in International Copyright
Matt Jackson
IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review
Volume 43, Number 4, 2003 p.607

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

96

The First-Scale Doctrine in International Intellectual Property Law: Trade in Copyright Related Entertainment Products
Theo Papadopoulos
Entertainment and Sports Law Journal
Volume 2, Number 2, Summer 2003 p.40

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

97

Internet File-sharing and the Liability of Intermediaries for Copyright Infringement: A Need for International Consensus
Matthew Just
Journal of Information, Law and Technology
2003, Issue 1

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

98

Choice of Law: International Copyright Laws or United States Constitution?
Suffolk Transnational Law Review
Volume 26, Number 2, Summer 2003 p.323

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

99

BEYOND NAPSTER, BEYOND THE UNITED STATES: THE TECHNOLOGICAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL BARRIERS TO ON-LINE COPYRIGHT ENFORCEMENT
Jeffrey L. Dodes
New York Law School Law Review
Volume 46, Numbers 1-2, 2002-2003 p.279

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

100

International Copyright Over the Last 50 Years – A Foreign Perspective
Silke von Lewinski
Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.
Volume 50, The 50th Anniversary Volume, 2003 p.581

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

101

Achieving Balance in International Copyright Law Review of The WIPO Treaties 1996: The WIPO Copyright Treaty and The WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty : Commentary and Legal Analysis
Jane C. Ginsburg
Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts
Volume 26, Number 2, Spring 2003 p.201

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

102

Promoting Progress or Rewarding Authors? Copyright Law and Free Speech in Bonneville International Corp. v. Peters
Edward L. Carter
Brigham Young University Law Review
Volume 2002, Number 4 p.1155

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

103

Government Works in an International Marketplace: The Copyright Issue
Raymond Wittig, Michael Zelenka, Sally Smith and Paul Manz
Syracuse Science & Technology Law Reporter
Fall 2002

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

104

The Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000: Ireland complies with its International Obligations
Hazel O’Keeffe, John Gaffney
Journal of World Intellectual Property
Volume 5, Number 4, July 2002 p.613-629

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

105

International Standards and Local Elements: New Developments of Copyright Law in China
Xiaoging Feng & Frank Xianfeng Huang
Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.
Volume 49, Number 4, Summer 2002 p.917

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

106

PARTICIPATION IN THE INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT SYSTEM AS A MEANS TO PROMOTE THE PROGRESS OF SCIENCE AND USEFUL ARTS
Shira Perlmutter
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Volume 36, Number 1, Fall 2002 p.323

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

In this Article, Shira Perlmutter, Vice President and Associate General Counsel, Intellectual Property Policy for AOL Time Warner, Inc., argues that the constitutional interpretation proposed by the petitioners in Eldred v. Ashcroft is too narrow. She demonstrates that the progress of science may be promoted in a variety of ways, not solely through incentives for new creation. Ms. Perlmutter focuses particularly on the benefits that can be gained through active participation in the international copyright system, and concludes that the adoption of petitioners’ narrow interpretation of the Constitution would have a substantial impact on the international copyright relations of the United States.

 

Conclusion

Notes

See Also

References and Further Reading

About the Author/s and Reviewer/s

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

Treaties.


Posted

in

, ,

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *