European Union law Part 16
221
The Uneasy Case for Top-Down Corporate Law Harmonization in the European Union
Luca Enriques & Matteo Gatti
University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law
Volume 27, Number 4, Winter 2006 p.939
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
222
THE SAFE country CONCEPT IN EUROPEAN UNION ASYLUM LAW: IN SAFE HANDS?
Nadine El-Enany
Cambridge Student Law Review
Volume 2, 2006 p.1
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
223
Whither Competition Law in Montenegro: Current status and future challenges
IRENA DAJKOVIC
European Competition Law Review
Volume 28, Issue 2, February 2007 p.92
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
The article analyses the recently adopted competition law in the newly independent state of Montenegro. The article seeks to raise awareness of the progress achieved in the field of competition in Montenegro and discusses a number of outstanding issues to be faced going forward. The competition framework is of particular importance now, as Montenegro moves towards signature of a Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the European Union.
224
The Legal Regime of Languages in European Union law
Inigo URRUTIA LIBARONA
Revue juridique Thémis
Volume 40, Number 3, 2006 p.707
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
225
Secondary Liability for Infringements of Copyright-Protected Works: Part 2
THOMAS HAYS
European Intellectual Property Review
Volume 29, Issue 1, January 2007 p.15
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
The development of the US law has often preceded changes in the rest of the world with respect to how contributory liability is applied to infringements of copyright in digital subject matter. This development follows a progression from placing liability on secondary actors at the centre of primarily infringing activities to placing liability on tangential facilitators on the basis of their intention to profit from primary infringements. With each change in the law and with each effort by right owners to enforce their rights against more remote participants in digital infringement processes, electronic commerce has adapted faster than the law, whether of the United States or the European Union, to decentralize the making and distribution of infringing copies. This transformation in the relative positions of right owners, the laws that protect them, consumers, and their facilitators heralds fundamental changes in commerce and in copyright law.
226
The Evolution and Decentralisation of Secondary Liability for Infringements of Copyright-protected Works (Part 1)
THOMAS HAYS
European Intellectual Property Review
Volume 28, Issue 12, December 2006 p.617
LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW
The development of US law has often preceded changes in the rest of the world with respect to how contributory liability is applied to infringements of copyright in digital subject-matter. This development follows a progression from placing liability on secondary actors at the centre of primarily infringing activities to placing liability on tangential facilitators on the basis of their intention to profit from primary infringements. With each change in the law and with each effort by right owners to enforce their rights against more remote participants in digital infringement processes, such as digital file sharers, electronic commerce has adapted faster than the law, whether of the United States or the European Union, to decentralise the making and distribution of infringing copies. This transformation in the relative positions of right owners, the laws that protect them, consumers, and their facilitators heralds fundamental changes in commerce and in copyright law.
Conclusion
Notes
See Also
References and Further Reading
About the Author/s and Reviewer/s
Author: international
Leave a Reply