Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods Contracting States

United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) Contracting States

At the United Nations Diplomatic Conference which adopted the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, “62 states took part: 22 European and other developed Western states, 11 socialist, 11 South-American, 7 African and 11 Asian countries; in other words, roughly speaking, 22 Western, 11 socialist and 29 third world countries”. Eörsi, 31 Am. J. Comp. L. 335 (1983). All of these “blocs” are represented in the Table of Contracting States. The text the delegates to the Diplomatic Conference unanimously approved came into effect in 1988. Its subsequent ratification pace has been comparable to that of a prior United Nations convention on international commercial law – – on arbitral awards, the 1958 New York Convention. Arbitration is relevant to the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods because a high proportion of all negotiated international sales contracts contain an arbitration clause.

Ratifications of conventions on international commercial law normally proceed at a glacial pace. The New York Arbitral Convention was a notable exception to this rule. The UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods is proving to be a similar exception to this rule. If the current trend continues, the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods will in time be subscribed to by over 100 countries.

Contracting States

For at state to adopt the CISG it is required that notification be deposited with the United Nations, after which the Convention will enter into force on the first day of the month following the expiration of twelve months after the date of the deposit of notification, being either an instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession according to CISG article 99(2). See also the annotated text of article 99.

As of 15 February 2017, UNCITRAL and UN reports that 85 States have adopted the CISG. Costa Rica is preparing the adoption of the Convention, but has not yet deposited the necessary notification with the UN required for the Convention to enter into force. Ghana and Venezuela never adopted the Convention, though they are original signatories to it.

Certain countries have adopted the CISG subject to authorized declarations and others have accompanied their acceptances with interpretive comments which is a procedure not authorized by the CISG.

Application of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods

For parties with their relevant places of business in different Contracting States, where their contract falls within the scope of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, the contract is automatically governed by the United Nations Convention, unless the parties indicate otherwise. In other words, where without reference to the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, the parties state that the contract is governed by the law of a Contracting State (e.g., parties from India and the France state, “This contract shall be governed by the law of New Delhi”) or the applicable law so holds, the contract is likely to be governed by the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. For parties to such international sales transactions who do not wish to have them governed by the CISG, the recommended procedure is to so state in their contracts.

The same may also apply when only one of the parties has his relevant place of business in a Contracting State if the applicable domestic law regards the law of that Contracting State as the governing law. This is subject to Article 95 of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.

In these two cases — contracting parties from different Contracting States, and a contract between a party from a Contracting State and a party from a non-Contracting State — the relevant UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods provisions are Articles 1(1)(a), 1(1)(b) and 95.


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

8 responses to “Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods Contracting States”

  1. international

    The CISG is the domestic law of each Contracting State of the Convention.

  2. international

    There are also cases in which principles of the CISG can apply to transactions between parties neither of whom has his relevant place of business in a Contracting State. The CISG can apply to such a contract solely by the election of the parties. For example, in the case of a transaction between parties from Taiwan and Brazil (neither of which is currently a Contracting State), the CISG can apply to their contract if the parties so elect, subject to the fact that when the CISG applies by law it can supersede otherwise applicable domestic law to the contrary; when the CISG applies solely by contract, it acts somewhat like a set of terms and conditions incorporated in the contract — in other words, in this situation it does not supersede mandatory provisions of the applicable domestic law where that law does not so permit.

  3. international

    There are situations in which principles of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods can be deemed applicable even when neither party has his relevant place of business in a Contracting State and the parties have made no reference to the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods in their contract. There are cases in which tribunals have so held

  4. international

    There are situations in which principles of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods can be deemed applicable even when neither party has his relevant place of business in a Contracting State and the parties have made no reference to the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods in their contract. There are cases in which tribunals have so held

  5. international

    Examples of authorized declarations: Pursuant to Article 94 The Nordic States (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden) declared that the entire Convention would not apply to inter-Scandinavian trade between parties from these countries. Pursuant to Article 93, several States have made territorial declarations, including Australia who has declared that the Convention shall not apply to the territories of Christmas Island, the Cocos (Keeling) Islands and the Ashmore and Cartier Islands, Denmark has declared that the Convention shall not apply to the Faroe Islands and Greenland, and New Zealand has declared that the Convention shall not apply to the Cook Islands, Niue and Tokelau. Pursuant to Article 95, Armenia, China (PRC), Czech Republic, Singapore, St.Vincent & Grenadines, Slovakia and the United States declared that they would not be bound by Article 1(1)(b). Pursuant to Article 96, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Chile, Paraguay, Russian Federation, Ukraine, and Vietnam have declared that any provision of Article 11, Article 29 or Part II of the Convention that allows a contract of sale or its modification or termination by agreement or any offer, acceptance, or other indication of intention be made in any form other than in writing does not apply where any party has his place in the country that has filed this declaration. China (PRC) has filed a similar declaration, but it is not couched in the precise phraseology called for by Article 96.

  6. international

    Examples of authorized declarations: Pursuant to Article 94 The Nordic States (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden) declared that the entire Convention would not apply to inter-Scandinavian trade between parties from these countries. Pursuant to Article 93, several States have made territorial declarations, including Australia who has declared that the Convention shall not apply to the territories of Christmas Island, the Cocos (Keeling) Islands and the Ashmore and Cartier Islands, Denmark has declared that the Convention shall not apply to the Faroe Islands and Greenland, and New Zealand has declared that the Convention shall not apply to the Cook Islands, Niue and Tokelau. Pursuant to Article 95, Armenia, China (PRC), Czech Republic, Singapore, St.Vincent & Grenadines, Slovakia and the United States declared that they would not be bound by Article 1(1)(b). Pursuant to Article 96, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Chile, Paraguay, Russian Federation, Ukraine, and Vietnam have declared that any provision of Article 11, Article 29 or Part II of the Convention that allows a contract of sale or its modification or termination by agreement or any offer, acceptance, or other indication of intention be made in any form other than in writing does not apply where any party has his place in the country that has filed this declaration. China (PRC) has filed a similar declaration, but it is not couched in the precise phraseology called for by Article 96.

  7. international

    Examples of interpretive comments that accompanied adoptions of the CISG includes the implementing acts of provinces of Canada, declaration made by Germany and Albania, and one by Hungary. Article 98 of the CISG states that “No reservations are permitted unless expressly authorized in this Convention.” See each country specific page for more on the possible effect of unauthorised declarations.

  8. international

    Examples of interpretive comments that accompanied adoptions of the CISG includes the implementing acts of provinces of Canada, declaration made by Germany and Albania, and one by Hungary. Article 98 of the CISG states that “No reservations are permitted unless expressly authorized in this Convention.” See each country specific page for more on the possible effect of unauthorised declarations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *