Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456.
Agon, S. (2016). Is compliance the name of the effectiveness game? Goal-shifting and the dynamics of judicial effectiveness at the WTO. World Trade Review, 1–31.
Alter, K. (2001). Establishing the supremacy of European law: The making of an international rule of law in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alter, K., & Meunier, S. (2006). Nested and overlapping regimes in the transatlantic Banana trade dispute. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3), 362–382.
Arend, A., & Beck, R. (1993). International law and the use of force: Beyond the UN Charter paradigm. New York: Routledge.
Austin, J. (1832). The providence of jurisprudence determined. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. (1986). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. In K. Oye (Ed.), Cooperation under anarchy (pp. 1–24). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Baccini, L., & Urpelainen, J. (2014). Before ratification: Understanding the timing of international treaty effects on domestic policies. International Studies Quarterly, 58(1), 29–43.
Barrett, S. (2007). Why cooperate? The incentive to supply global public goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bechtel, M., & Scheve, K. (2013). Mass support for global climate change agreements depends on institutional design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 11(34), 13763–13768.
Black, D. (1999). The long and winding road: International norms and domestic political change in South Africa. In T. Risse, S. Ropp, & K. Sikkink (Eds.), The power of human rights (pp. 78–108). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Bodansky, D. (2013) Legitimacy in international law and international relations. In J. Dunoff, & M. Pollack, Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law: The state of the art (pp. 321–344). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Börzel, T., Hofmann, T., & Panke, D. (2012). Caving in or sitting it out? Longitudinal patterns of non-compliance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 454–471.
Brewster, R. (2013). Reputation in international relations and international law theory. In J. Dunoff & M. Pollack (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law: The state of the art (pp. 524–543). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brewster, R. (2009). Unpacking the state’s reputation. Harvard International Law Journal, 50(2), 231–269.
Brown Weiss, E., & Jacobson, H. (1998). Engaging countries: Strengthening compliance with international environmental accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brunée, J., & Toope, S. (2010). Legitimacy and legality in international law: An interactional account. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society. New York: Columbia University Press.
Byers, M. (Ed.). (2000). The role of law in international politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carpenter, C. (2007). Setting the advocacy agenda: Issues and non-issues around children and armed conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 99–120.
Chaudoin, S. (2014). Promises or policies? An experimental analysis of international agreements and audience reactions. International Organization, 68(1), 235–256.
Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. (1991). Compliance without enforcement: State behavior under regulatory treaties. Negotiation Journal, 7(3), 311–330.
Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. (1995). The new sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Checkel, J. (2001). Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. International Organization, 55(3), 553–588.
Chilton, A. (2015). The laws of war and public opinion: An experimental study. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 171(1), 181–201.
Chilton, A., & Tingley, D. (2013). Why the study of international law needs experiments. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 52(1), 173–237.
Cole, W. (2015a). Mind the gap: State capacity and the implementation of human rights treaties. International Organization, 69(2), 405–441.
Cole, W. (2015b). International human rights and domestic income inequality: A difficult case of compliance in world society. American Sociological Review.
Conrad, C. (2014). Divergent incentives for dictators: Domestic institutions and (international promises not to) torture. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(1), 34–67.
Conrad, C., & Hencken Ritter, C. (2013). Treaties, tenure, and torture: The conflicting domestic effects of international law. Journal of Politics, 75(2), 397–409.
Conrad, C., Hill, D., & Moore, W. (2015). Torture and the limits of democratic institutions. Working paper.
Dai, X. (2006). The conditional nature of democratic compliance. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 690–713.
Davey, W. (2006). The WTO: Looking forwards. Journal of International Economic Law, 9(1), 3–29.
Davis, C. (2012). Why adjudicate? Enforcing trade rules in the WTO. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Desierto, D. (2012). Necessity and national emergency clauses. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Downs, G., & Jones, M. (2002). Reputation, compliance, and international law. Journal of Legal Studies, 31, S95–S114.
Downs, G., Rocke, D., & Barsoom, P. (1996). Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization, 50(3), 379–406.
Dunoff, J., Ratner, S., & Wippman, D. (2010). International law: Norms, actors, process: A problem-oriented approach. New York: Aspen.
Farber, D. (2002). Rights as signals. Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1), 83–98.
Fariss, C. (2015). The changing standard of accountability and the positive relationship between human rights treaty ratification and compliance. British Journal of Political Science. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2517457.
Fearon, J., & Wendt, A. (2002). Rationalism v. constructivism: A skeptical view. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 52–72). London: SAGE.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.
Fisher, R. (1981). Improving compliance with international law. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Franck, T. (1990). The power of legitimacy among nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Franck, T. (1995). Fairness in international law and institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gartzke, E., & Gleditsch, K. (2004). Why democracies may actually be less reliable allies. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 775–795.
Geddes, B. (1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis, 2(1), 131–150.
Gibler, D. (2008). The cost of reneging: Reputation and alliance formation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(2), 426–454.
Goldsmith, J., & Posner, E. (2005). The limits of international law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. (2004). How to influence states: Socialization and international human rights law. Duke Law Journal, 54(3), 621–703.
Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. (2008). Incomplete internalization and compliance with human rights law. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 725–748.
Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. (2013). Socializing states: Promoting human rights through international law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Grieco, J., Gelpo, C., & Warren, T. (2009). When preferences and commitments collide: The effect of relative partisan shifts on international treaty compliance. International Organization, 63(2), 341–355.
Grotius, H. (1625). On the law of war and peace. Whitefish, VT: Kessinger.
Guzman, A. (2008). How international law works: A rational choice theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haas, P. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization, 43(3), 377–403.
Haas, P. (2002). UN conferences and constructivist governance of the environment. Global Governance, 8(1), 73–91.
Hafner-Burton, E. (2005). Trading human rights: How preferential trading agreements influence government repression. International Organization, 59(3), 593–629.
Hafner-Burton, E. (2009). Forced to be good: Why trade agreements boost human rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hafner-Burton, E., LeVeck, B., & Victor, G. (2015). How the prospect of non-compliance affects elite preferences for international cooperation: Evidence from a ‘Lab in the Field’ experiment. ILAR Working Paper no. 28. Retrieved from https://www.pagesucsd.edu/~ehafner/pdfs/ILAR_Working-Paper_28.pdf.
Hafner-Burton, E., LeVeck, B., & Victor, G. (2016). Punitive power: How international law helps activists. Journal of Politics. Retrieved from https://pages.ucsd.edu/~ehafner/pdfs/ILAR_working-paper_23.pdf.
Hafner-Burton, E., & Tsutsui, K. (2005). Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1373–1411.
Hafner-Burton, E., & Tsutsui, K. (2007). Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 407–425.
Hart, H. L. A. (1997 [1961]). The concept of law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hathaway, O. (2002). Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law Journal, 111(8), 1935–2042.
Hathaway, O. (2007). Why do countries commit to human rights treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(4), 588–621.
Helfer, L. (2013). Flexibility in international agreements. In J. Dunoff & M. Pollack, Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law: The state of the art (pp. 175–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Henkin, L. (1979). How nations behave. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hill, D. (2010). Estimating the effects of human rights Treaties on state behavior. Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1161–1174.
Hobbes, T. (2006 [1651]). Leviathan. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Howse, R., & Teitel, R. (2010). Beyond compliance: Rethinking why international law really matters. Global Policy, 1(2), 127–136.
Hyde, S. (2015). Experiments in international relations: Lab, survey, and field. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 403–424.
Jepperson, R., Wendt, A., & Katzenstein, P. (1996). Norms, identity, and culture in international security. In P. Katzenstein (Ed.), The culture of national security (pp. 33–75). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Johnston, A. (2001). Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly, 45(4), 487–515.
Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89–101.
Kelley, J. (2007). Who keeps international commitments and why? The international criminal court and bilateral nonsurrender agreements. American Political Science Review, 101(3), 573–589.
Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. (1995). Reciprocity in international relations. International Organization, 40(1), 1–27.
Keohane, R. (1997). International relations and international law: Two optics. Harvard International Law Journal, 38(2), 487–502.
Khagram, S., J. Riker, & K. Sikkink. (2002). Restructuring world politics: transnational social movements, networks, and norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kingsbury, B. (1998). The concept of compliance as a function of competing conceptions of international law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 19(2), 345–372.
Koh, H. H. (1997). Why do nations obey international law? Yale Law Journal, 106(8), 2599–2659.
Koh, H. H. (1998). Bringing international law home. Houston Law Review, 35(3), 623–681.
Koh, H. H. (2005). Internalization through socialization. Duke Law Journal, 54(4), 975–983.
Koremenos, B. (2001). Loosening the ties that bind: A learning model of agreement flexibility. International Organization, 55(2), 289–325.
Koremenos, B. (2005). Contracting around international uncertainty. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 549–565.
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799.
Krasner, S. (Ed.). (1982). International regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 185–510.
Kratochwil, F., & Ruggie, J. (1986). International organization: A state of the art on an art of the state. International Organization, 40(4), 753–775.
Kucik, J., & Reinhardt, E. (2008). Does flexibility promote cooperation? An application to the global trade regime. International Organization, 62(3), 477–505.
Lebovic, J., & Voeten, E. (2009). The cost of shame: International organizations and foreign aid in the punishing of human rights violators. Journal of Peace Research, 46(1), 79–97.
Leeds, B. A. (2003). Alliance reliability in times of war: Explaining state decisions to violate treaties. International Organization, 57(4), 801–827.
Lupu, Y. (2013). The informative power of treaty commitment: Using the spatial model to address selection effects. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 912–925.
Leebron, D. (2002). Linkages. The American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 5–27.
Lupu, Y. (2015). Legislative veto players and the effects of international human rights agreements. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 578–594.
Machiavelli, N. (1989 [1532]). The Prince. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Mansfield, E., Milner, H., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2002). Why democracies cooperate more: Electoral control and international trade agreements. International Organization, 56(3), 477–513.
Martin, L. (2000). Democratic commitments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Martin, L. (2013). Against compliance. In J. Dunoff & M. Pollack (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law: The state of the art (pp. 591–612). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McGillivray, F., & Smith, A. (2000). Trust and cooperation through agent-specific punishments. International Organization, 54(4), 809–824.
Mearsheimer, J. (1994–1995). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.
Milner, H. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: domestic politics and international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, R. (1994). Regime design matters: Intentional oil pollution and treaty compliance. International Organization, 48(3), 425–458.
Mitchell, S. M., & Hensel, P. (2007). International institutions and compliance with agreements. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 721–737.
Montoya, C. (2008). The European Union, capacity building, and transnational networks: Combating violence against women through the Daphne Program. International Organization, 62(2), 359–372.
Moore, D H. (2003). A signaling theory of human rights compliance. Northwestern University Law Review, 97(2), 879–910.
Moravcsik, A. (1999). Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), 669–681.
Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics among nations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Morrow, J. (2002). The laws of war, common conjectures, and legal systems in international politics. Journal of Legal Studies, 31(S1), S41–60.
Morrow, J. (2007). When do states follow the laws of war? American Political Science Review, 101(3), 559–572.
Morrow, J. (2014). Order within anarchy: The laws of war as an international institution. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Muchlinski, P. (2014). Corporations in international law. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.
Nelson, S. (2010). Does compliance matter? Assessing the relationship between sovereign risk and compliance with international law. Review of International Organizations, 5(2), 107–139.
Neumayer, E. (2005). Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 925–953.
Ohlin, J. (2015). The assault on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Park, J. H., & Hirose, K. (2013). Domestic politics, reputational sanctions, and international compliance. International Theory, 5(2), 300–320.
Poast, P. (2012). Does Issue Linkage Work? Evidence from European Alliance Negotiations, 1860 to 1945. International Organization, 66(2), 277–310.
Pollack, M. (2003). The engines of European integration: Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Powell, E., & Staton, J. (2009). Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 149–174.
Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.
Rajagopal, B. (2003). International law from below: development, social movements and Third World resistance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Raustiala, K., & Slaughter, A. M. (2002). Compliance, international relations, and international law. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations. London: SAGE.
Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (1998). Conclusions. In D. G. Victor, K. Raustiala, & E. B. Skolnikoff (Eds.), The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: Theory and practice (pp. 659–708). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rickard, S. (2010). Democratic differences: Electoral institutions and compliance with GATT/WTO agreements. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 711–729.
Risse, T., Ropp, S., & Sikkink, K. (2013). The persistent power of human rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: Introduction. In T. Risse, S. Ropp, & K. Sikkink (Eds.), The power of human rights. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (2013). Conclusion. In T. Risse, S. Sikkink, & S. Ropp (Eds.), The persistent power of human rights (pp. 275–295). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosendorff, B. P., & Milner, H. (2001). The optimal design of international trade institutions: Uncertainty and escape. International Organization, 55(4), 829–857.
Sanchez, T. (2009). After ratification: The domestic politics of treaty implementation and compliance. (PhD diss., Columbia University).
Schechter, M., & Bochenek, M. (2008). Working to eliminate human rights abuses of children: A cross-national comparative study. Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 579–606.
Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S., & Knobel, H. (2003). Costs, commitment and compliance: The impact of EU democratic conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(3), 495–518.
Setear, J. (2002). The president’s rational choice of a treaty’s preratification pathway: Article II, congressional-executive agreement, or executive agreement? Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1), S5–S31.
Shelton, D. (Ed.). (2000). Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sikkink, K. (2003). A typology of relations between social movements and international institutions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, 97, 301–305.
Simmons, B. (1998). Compliance with international agreements. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(June), 75–93.
Simmons, B. (2000). International law and state behavior: Commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs. American Political Science Review, 94(4), 819–835.
Simmons, B. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, B. (2010). Treaty compliance and violation. Annual Review of Political Science, 13(June), 273–296.
Simmons, B., & Hopkins, D. (2005). The constraining power of international treaties: Theory and methods. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 623–631.
Slaughter, A. (1995). International law in a world of liberal states. European Journal of International Law, 6, 1–39.
Spilker, G., & Böhmelt, T. (2013). The impact of preferential trade agreements on governmental repression revisited. Review of International Organization, 8(3), 343–361.
Staton, J., & Moore, W. (2011). Judicial power in domestic and international politics. International Organization, 65(3), 553–587.
von Stein, J. (2005). Do treaties constrain or screen? Selection bias and treaty compliance. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 611–622.
von Stein, J. (2016). Making promises, keeping promises: Democracy, ratification, and compliance in international human rights law. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 655–679.
Schachter, O. (1991). International law in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
Stiglitz, J. (2007). Multinational corporations: Balancing rights and responsibilities. Proceeds of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, 101, 3–60.
Stiles, K. (2015). State responses to international law. New York: Routledge.
Sykes, A. (1991). Protectionism as a ‘safeguard’: A positive analysis of the GATT Escape Clause with normative speculations. University of Chicago Law Review, 58, 255–306.
Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609–643.
Tesón, F. (1992). The Kantian theory of international law. Columbia Law Review, 92(1), 53–102.
The Paquete Habana. (1900). 175 U.S. 677; 20 S.Ct. 290; 44 L.Ed. 320.
Thomas, D. (2001). The Helsinki effect: International norms, human rights, and the demise of communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thompson, A. (2009). The rational enforcement of international law: solving the sanctioners’ Dilemma. International Theory, 1(2), 307–321.
Thompson, A. (2010). Channels of power: The UN security council and U.S. statecraft in Iraq. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Thompson, A. (2013). Coercive enforcement in international law. In J. Dunoff & M. Pollack, Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law: The state of the art (pp. 502–523). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tingley, D., & Tomz, M. (2014). Conditional cooperation and climate change. Comparative Political Studies, 47(3), 344–368.
Tomz, M. (2008). Reputation and the effect of international law on preferences and beliefs. Working paper, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~tomz/working/Tomz-IntlLaw-2008-02-11a.pdf.
Tomz, M., & Weeks, J. (2015). Military alliances and public support for war. Working paper, Stanford University and University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~tomz/working/TomzWeeks-Alliances-2015-02-14.pdf.
Trachtman, J. (2008). The economic structure of international law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tsutsui, K., Whitlinger, C., & Lim, A. (2012). International human rights law and social movements: States’ resistance and civil society’s insistence. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 367–396.
Urpelainen, J. (2010). Enforcing international environmental cooperation: Technological standards can help. Review of International Organizations, 5(4), 475–496.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. 1155 U.N.T.S. [United Nations Treaty Series] 331.1969.
Wallace, G. (2013). International law and public attitudes toward torture: An experimental study. International Organization, 67(1), 105–140.
World Trade Organization. (2012). Historic signing ends 20 years of EU-Latin American banana disputes. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news12_e/disp_08nov12_e.htm.
Wotipka, C., & Tsutsui, K. (2008). Global human rights and state sovereignty: Nation states’ ratifications of international human rights treaties, 1965–2001. Sociological Forum, 23(4), 724–754.
Young, O. (1979). Compliance and public authority. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Young, O. (1994). International governance: Protecting the environment in a stateless society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Zürn, M. (2004). Law and compliance at different levels. In M. Zürn & C. Joerges (Eds.), Law and governance in postnational Europe: Compliance beyond the nation-state. New York: Cambridge University Press
Leave a Reply