This writer on public affairs was the supreme authority of the democrats in his time. He, to a greater extent than anyone else, completely accepted the theory of the total inertness of mankind in the presence of the legislators:
“If it is true that a great prince is rare, then is it not true that a great legislator is even more rare? The prince has only to follow the pattern that the legislator creates. The legislator is the mechanic who invents the machine; the prince is merely the workman who sets it in motion.”
Rousseau rules over legislators themselves, and teaches them their trade in these imperious terms:
“Would you give stability to the state? Then bring the extremes as closely together as possible. Tolerate neither wealthy persons nor beggars.
If the soil is poor or barren, or the country too small for its inhabitants, then turn to industry and arts, and trade these products for the foods that you need…. On a fertile soil—if you are short of inhabitants—devote all your attention to agriculture, because this multiplies people; banish the arts, because they only serve to depopulate the nation….
If you have extensive and accessible coast lines, then cover the sea with merchant ships; you will have a brilliant but short existence. If your seas wash only inaccessible cliffs, let the people be barbarous and eat fish; they will live more quietly—perhaps better—and, most certainly, they will live more happily.
In short, and in addition to the maxims that are common to all, every people has its own particular circumstances. And this fact in itself will cause legislation appropriate to the circumstances.
This is the reason why the Hebrews formerly—and, more recently, the Arabs—had religion as their principle objective. The objective of the Athenians was literature; of Carthage and Tyre, commerce; of Rhodes, naval affairs; of Sparta, war; and of Rome, virtue. The author of The Spirit of Laws has shown by what art the legislator should direct his institutions toward each of these objectives …. But suppose that the legislator mistakes his proper objective, and acts on a principle different from that indicated by the nature of things? Suppose that the selected principle sometimes creates slavery, and sometimes liberty; sometimes wealth, and sometimes population; sometimes peace, and sometimes conquest? This confusion of objective will slowly enfeeble the law and impair the constitution. The state will be subjected to ceaseless agitations until it is destroyed or changed, and invincible nature regains her empire.”
Rousseau invests the creators, organizers, directors, legislators, and controllers of society with a terrible responsibility. He is, therefore, most exacting with them:
“He who would dare to undertake the political creation of a people ought to believe that he can, in a manner of speaking, transform human nature; transform each individual—who, by himself, is a solitary and perfect whole—into a mere part of a greater whole from which the individual will henceforth receive his life and being. Thus the person who would undertake the political creation of a people should believe in his ability to alter man’s constitution; to strengthen it; to substitute for the physical and independent existence received from nature, an existence which is partial and moral. In short, the would-be creator of political man must remove man’s own forces and endow him with others that are naturally alien to him.”
References and Further Reading
About the Author/s and Reviewer/s
Mentioned in these Entries
Genealogies of Property, History of Citation Indexing, History of the International Labour Organization, Jacques Derrida, Joseph Caillaux, Lawyers and Principles of Economics, Not so popular law topics at Schools, Raynal, Top 25.000 English words, country.
Writing for the Encyclopedia: Are you interested in submitting an entry to this legal reference?. We are always looking for fresh original entries. Our editorial requirements require you be an established authority to contribute content and provide original content to our site. Please, submit here. For more information, contact us.
This entry about Rousseau has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use and reproduction, provided the author or authors of the Rousseau entry and the Encyclopedia of Law are in each case credited as the source of the Rousseau entry. Please note this CC BY licence applies to some textual content of Rousseau, and that some images and other textual or non-textual elements may be covered by special copyright arrangements. For guidance on citing Rousseau (giving attribution as required by the CC BY licence), please see below our recommendation of "Cite this Entry".
Cite this entryLegal Citations Generator
|(2012, 07). Rousseau lawin.org Retrieved 03, 2015, from http://lawin.org/rousseau|
|"Rousseau" lawin.org. 07 2012. 03 2015 <http://lawin.org/rousseau>|
|"Rousseau" lawin.org. lawin.org, 07 2012. Web. 03 2015. <http://lawin.org/rousseau>|
|"Rousseau" lawin.org. 07, 2012. Accesed 03 2015. http://lawin.org/rousseau|
|international, 'Rousseau' (lawin.org 2012) <http://lawin.org/rousseau> accesed 2015 March 27|
- Article Name: Rousseau
- Author: international
- Description: ContentsRousseauConclusionNotesSee AlsoReferences and Further ReadingAbout the Author/s and Reviewer/sMentioned in these [...]
This entry was last modified: July 25, 2012