Other ALI projects

See Codifications, studies and other ALI projects , American Legal Institute General Bibliography and Restatements of laws .

The American Legal Institute, through a careful and deliberative process, drafts and then publishes various restatements of the law and proposals for legal reform. Its projects generally are assigned to one of three broad categories: Restatements, model or proposed legislation, or Principles.

Restatements of laws are addressed to courts and others applying existing law. They aim at clear formulations of Common law and its statutory elements or variations and reflect the law as it presently stands or might plausibly be stated by a court. Restatement black-letter formulations assume the stance of describing the law as it is.

Model codes or statutes and other statutory proposals are addressed mainly to legislatures, with a view toward legislative enactment. Statutory formulations assume the stance of prescribing the law as it shall be.

Principles may be addressed to courts, legislatures, or governmental agencies. They assume the stance of expressing the law as it should be, which may or may not reflect the law as it is.

The nature, content, and scope of each project are initially developed by its Reporter in consultation with the Institute’s Director. The Director’s recommendations that particular projects be undertaken and designations of specific Reporters are subject to the approval of the Council or Executive Committee.

A project is developed in a series of drafts prepared by the Reporter and reviewed by the project’s Advisers and Members Consultative Group, the Council, and the ALI membership. Preliminary Drafts and Council Drafts are available only to project participants and to the Council. Tentative Drafts, Discussion Drafts, and Proposed Final Drafts are publicly available. Once it is approved by the membership at an Annual Meeting, a Tentative Draft or a Proposed Final Draft represents the most current statement of the American Law Institute’s position on the subject and may be cited in opinions or briefs (e.g., as Restatement Third, Trusts, Tentative Draft No. 6, 2011) until the official text is published. The vote of approval allows for possible further revision of the drafts to reflect the discussion at the Meeting or to make editorial improvements.

The project’s Reporter initially prepares a Preliminary Draft of one or more substantial segments of the project for review by the Advisers. Preliminary Drafts are normally also reviewed by the Members Consultative Group for the project.

A Tentative Draft, incorporating any revisions directed or agreed to by the Council, is submitted to the Annual Meeting for action by the membership. It is distributed in advance to the membership as a whole, which is invited to submit written comments and suggestions, and it is also made available to the entire legal community. At the close of the discussion, the Tentative Draft, subject to any changes resulting from the Annual Meeting, may be approved in whole or part or remanded in whole or part to the Reporter for further revision and eventual resubmission to the membership.

Kripke, The Importance of the Code, 21 U. Tol. L. Rev. 591 (1990).
Kripke, Mr. Levenberg’s Criticism of the Final Report of the Article 9 Review Committee: A Reply,
56 Minn. L. Rev. 805 (1972).
Kripke, A Reflective Pause Between UCC Past and UCC Future, 43 Ohio St. L.J. 603 (1982).
Kripke, Some Dissonant Notes About Article 2A, 39 Ala. L. Rev. 791 (1988).
Kripke, Some Reflections After a QuarterCentury
of the Uniform Commercial Code and on the
Inception of a New Bankruptcy Code, 87 Com. L.J. 124 (1982).
Kozolchyk, The Commercialization of Civil Law and the Civilization of Commercial law , 40 La. L.
Rev. 3 (1979).
Ladd, A Modern Code of Evidence, 27 Iowa L. Rev. 213 (1942).
Lakin, Bulk Transfers: What Hath the Uniform Commercial Code Wrought?, 35 Md. L. Rev. 197
(1975).
Lakin, Stop Payment Orders: What Hath the Uniform Commercial Code Wrought?, 63 Ky. L.J. 299
(1975).
Land, Unallocated Premium in Corporate Acquisitions Under The American Law Institute
Subchapter C Proposals, 34 Tax Law. 341 (1981).
Lawrence, Misconceptions About Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code: A Suggested
Methodology and Proposed Revisions, 62 N.C.L. Rev. 115 (1983).
Lawscope, Federal Securities Code Faces Long, Uphill Struggle, 65 A.B.A. J. 1159 (1979).
Llewellyn, General Plan of the Uniform Commercial Code, N.J. St. B. Ass’n Yearbook 80 (1950).
Llewellyn, Why a Commercial Code?, 22 Tenn. L. Rev. 779 (1953).
Loss, Codification of the Federal Securities Law in the United States: A Case Study in Legislative
Reform, in 2 Europaisches Rechtsdenken in Geschichte und Gegenwart 287 (1982).
Louis Loss, The Federal Securities Code: Its Advantages for Business (Feb. 1981 pamphlet).
Louis Loss, Fundamentals of Securities Regulation (1983).
Loss and Blackstone, Codification of the Federal Securities Law, 28 Bus. Law. 381 (1973).
Lowenfels, The Case Against the Proposed Federal Securities Code, 65 Va. L. Rev. 615 (1979).
McCormick, The New Code of Evidence of The American Law Institute, 20 Tenn. L. Rev. 661
(1942).
McDonnell, Freedom from Claims and Defenses: A Study in Judicial Activism Under the Uniform
Commercial Code, 17 Ga. L. Rev. 569 (1983).
McDonnell, Purposive Interpretation of the Uniform Commercial Code: Some Implications for
Jurisprudence, 126 U. Pa. L. Rev. 795 (1978).
Mentschikoff, The Uniform Commercial Code: An Experiment in Democracy of Drafting, 36 A.B.A.
J. 419 (1950).
Miller, The ALI Test for Insanity: A Reexamination,
11 Bull. Am. Acad. Psychiatry & L. 35
(1983).
Miller, The Uniform Commercial Code: Will the Experiment Continue?, 43 Mercer L. Rev. 799
(1992).
Minahan, The Eroding Uniformity of the Uniform Commercial Code, 65 Ky. L.J. 799 (19761977).
Miniter, Buyer’s Right of Rejection: A Quarter Century Under the Uniform Commercial Code, and
Recent International Developments, 13 Ga. L. Rev. 805 (1979).
Morgan, The Code of Evidence Proposed by The American Law Institute, 20 Neb. L. Rev. 77
(1941).
Moses, The Uniform Commercial Code Meets the Seventh Amendment: The Demise of Jury Trials
Under Article 5? 72 Ind. L.J. 681 (1997).
Murray, The Article 2 Prism: The Underlying Philosophy of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial
Code, 21 Washburn L.J. 1 (1981).
Murray, The Emerging Article 2: The Latest Iteration, 35 Duq. L. Rev. 533 (1997).
National Legal Center for the Public Interest, The American Law Institute and Corporate
Governance: An Analysis and Critique (1987).
Nicles, Problems of Sources of Law Relationships Under the Uniform Commercial Code-Part I:
The Methodological Problem and the Civil Law Approach; Part II: The English Approach and a
Solution to the Methodological Problem, 32 Ark. L. Rev. 1; 171 (1977).
Nimmer, et al., License Contracts Under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code: A Proposal,
19 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 281 (1993).
Nordstrom and Ramerman, The Uniform Commercial Code and the Choice of Law, 3 U.C.C.L.J.
230 (1971).
Oldham, ALI Principles of Family Dissolution: Some Comments, 1997 U. Ill. L. Rev. 801 (1997).
Panel: Uniform State Laws: A Discussion Focused on Revision of the Uniform Commercial Code,
22 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 257 (1997).
Patchel, Interest Group Politics, Federalism, and the Uniform Laws Process: Some Lessons from
the Uniform Commercial Code, 78 Minn. L. Rev. 83 (1993).
Patterson, Good Faith, Lender Liability, and Discretionary Acceleration: Of Llewellyn,
Wittgenstein, and the Uniform Commercial Code, 68 Tex. L. Rev. 169 (1989).
Perkins, The ALI Corporate Governance Project in Midstream, 41 Bus. Law. 1195 (1986).
Perkins, The Genesis and Goals of the ALI Corporate Governance Project, 8 Cardozo L. Rev. 661
(1987).
Edmund T. Pratt, Jr., The ALI Corporate Governance Project: A Radical Cure for a Healthy Patient
(National Legal Center for the Public Interest) (1989).
Postlewaite, et al., A Critique of the ALI’s Federal Income Tax Project-Subchapter K: Proposals
on the Taxation of Partners, 75 Geo. L.J. 423 (1986).
Prim, The Mens Rea Requirement for Conspiracy: The Model Penal Code and the Progressive Law
of Judge Learned Hand, 40 Mo. L. Rev. 467 (1975).
Rapson, Deficiencies and Ambiguities in Lessors’ Remedies Under Article 2A: Using Official
Comments to Cure Problems in the Statute, 39 Ala. L. Rev. 875 (1988).
Rapson, UCC Article 6: Should It Be Revised or “DeepSixed”?,
38 Bus. Law. 1753, 88 Com. L.J.
600 (1983).
Rapson, Who Is Looking Out for the Public Interest? Thoughts About the UCC Revision Process in
the Light (and Shadows) of Professor Rubin’s Observations, 28 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 249 (1994).
Ribstein, The Mandatory Nature of the ALI Code, 61 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 984 (1993).
Riley, The American Law Institute’s Principles of Corporate Governance, 16 Company Law. 122
(1995).
Ring, The UCC Process-Concensus and Balance, 28 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1801 (1994).
Schnader, History of the Uniform Commercial Code, N.J. St. B. Ass’n Yearbook 70 (1950).
Schnader, The New Movement Toward Uniformity in Commercial LawThe
Uniform Commercial
Code Marches On, 13 Bus. Law. 646 (1958).
Schnader, A Short History of the Preparation and Enactment of the Uniform Commercial Code, 22
U. Miami L. Rev. 1 (1967).
Schwartz, The ALI Reporters’ Study, 15 U. Haw. L. Rev. 529 (1993).
Schwartz, ed., Crime and The American System, The Annals, Vol. 39 (1962).
Schwartz, The Model Penal Code: An Invitation to Law Reform, 49 A.B.A. J. 447 (1963).
Scott, Corporation Law and The American Law Institute Corporate Governance Project, 35 Stan.
L. Rev. 927 (1983).
Scott, The Politics of Article 9, 80 Va. L. Rev. 1783 (1994).
Joel Seligman, An Analysis of The American Law Institute’s Corporate Governance Project
(Investor Responsibility Research Center) (1986).
Seligman, A Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing: The American Law Institute Principles of Corporate
Governance, 55 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 325 (1987).
Shkolnick, The Revision of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 5 Creighton L. Rev. 255
(1972).
Skilton, Some Comments on the Comments to the UCC, 1966 Wis. L. Rev. 597 (1966).
Surrey, The Income Tax Project of The American Law Institute, 31 Taxes 959 (1953).
The American Bar Association’s Business Lawyer journal has published an annual survey on the
Uniform Commercial Code for many years.
Symposium: The ALI Corporate Governance Project, 37 U. Miami L. Rev. 169 (1983).
Symposium: ALI’s Complex Litigation Recommendations, 1995 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 731 (1995).
Symposium: American Law Institute Complex Litigation Project, 54 La. L. Rev. 833 (1994).
Symposium: American Law Institute’s Corporate Governance Project, 52 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 495
(1984).
Symposium: The American Law Institute’s Principles of Corporate Governance, 61 Geo. Wash. L.
Rev. 871 (1993).
Symposium: The American Law Institute’s Proposed Federal Securities Code, 30 Vand. L. Rev.
311 (1977).
Symposium: The American Law Institute’s Proposed Federal Securities Code, 32 Vand. L. Rev.
455 (1979).
Symposium: Article Nine of the Uniform Commercial Code, 16 Mem. St. U.L. Rev. 1 (1985).
Symposium: Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code: Where Do We Go from Here?, 29 Idaho
L. Rev. 561 (19921993).
Symposium: Article 6 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 41 Ala. L. Rev. 549 (1990).
Symposium: Article 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code, 39 Ala. L. Rev. 559 (1988).
Symposium: Consumer Protection and the Uniform Commercial Code, 75 Wash. U. L.Q. 1 (1997).
Symposium: Is the UCC Dead, or Alive and Well?, 26 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 535 (1993).
Symposium: Is the UCC Dead, or Alive and Well? Practitioners’ Perspectives, 28 Loy. L.A. L. Rev.
89 (1994).
Symposium: Origins and Evolution: Drafters Reflect upon the Uniform Commercial Code, 43 Ohio
St. L.J. 535 (1982).
Symposium: Perspectives on The American Law Institute’s Reporters’ Study on Enterprise
Responsibility for Personal Injury, 30 San Diego L. Rev. 213 (1993).
Symposium: The Proposed Federal Securities Code, 1 Pace L. Rev. 279 (1981).
Symposium: Revised UCC Articles 3 & 4 and New Article 4A, 42 Ala. L. Rev. 351 (1991).
Symposium: The Revision of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 35 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.
1299 (1994).
Symposium: Revision of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 80 Va. L. Rev. 1783 (1994).
Symposium: Symposium on Corporate Governance, 48 Bus. Law. 1271 (1993).
Symposium: The 25th Anniversary of the Model Penal Code, 19 Rutgers L.J. 519 (1988) (result
of November 57,
1987, conference sponsored by Rutgers-Camden Law School and The
American Law Institute).
Symposium: UCC Article 5, 56 Brooklyn L. Rev. 1 (1990).
Symposium: UCC Article 9, 44 Okla. L. Rev. 351 (1991).
Symposium: UCC Revisions: Promises and Pitfalls, 43 Mercer L. Rev. 799 (1992).
Symposium: Uniform Commercial Code, 21 U. Tol. L. Rev. 591 (1990).
Symposium: Uniform Commercial Code, 70 Mich. B.J. 267 (1991).
Symposium: Uniform Commercial Code Article 2: In Celebration of the One Hundredth Birthday
of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, 27 Idaho L. Rev. 409
(19901991).
Taggart, The New Estate and Gift Tax Regime, 31 Buffalo L. Rev. 797 (1982).
Tappan, Sentencing Under the Model Penal Code, 23 Law & Contemp. Prob. 528 (1958).
Taylor, Uniformity of Commercial law and StatebyState
Enactment: A Confluence of
Contradictions, 30 Hastings L.J. 337 (1978).
Thuronyi, The Taxation of Corporate IncomeA
Proposal for Reform, 2 Am. J. Tax Pol’y 109
(1983).
Titus, Unification, Modernization and a Modicum of Predictability: An Introduction to the Proposed
Federal Securities Code, 7 Conn. L. Rev. 658 (1975).
Treiman, Recklessness and the Model Penal Code, 9 Am. J. Crim. L. 281 (1981).
Verbit, Annals of Tax Reform: The American Law Institute Proposals to Modify Subchapter J, 3
Am. J. Tax Pol’y 195 (1985).
Vergari, Articles 3 and 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code in an Electronic Fund Transfer
Environment, 17 San Diego L. Rev. 287 (1980).
Vorenberg, ALI Approves Model Code of PreArraignment
Procedure, 61 A.B.A. J. 1212 (1975).
Wade, Tort Liability for Products Causing Physical Injury and Article 2 of the UCC, 48 Mo. L. Rev.
1 (1983).
Wechsler, American Law Institute: Some Observations on Its Model Penal Code, 42 A.B.A. J. 321
(1956).
Wechsler, The Challenge of a Model Penal Code, 65 Harv. L. Rev. 1097 (1952).
Wechsler, Codification of Criminal Law in the United States: The Model Penal Code, 68 Colum. L.
Rev. 1425 (1968).
Wechsler, Legal Scholarship and Criminal Law, 9 J. Legal Ed. 18 (1956).
Wechsler, The Model Penal Code and the Codification of America Criminal Law, in Crime,
Criminology and Public Policy: Essays in Honour of Sir Leon Radzinowicz 419 (Roger Hood ed.,
1974).
Wechsler, Revision and Codification of Penal Law in the United States, 7 Dalhousie L.J. 219
(1983).
Wechsler, Sentencing, Correction, and the Model Penal Code, 109 U. Pa. L. Rev. 465 (1961).
Wechsler, A Thoughtful Code of Substantive Law, 45 J. Crim. L.C. & P.S. 524 (1955).
Weinberg, Mass Torts at the Neutral Forum: A Critical Analysis of the ALI’s Proposed Choice Rule,
56 Alb. L. Rev. 807 (1993).
Weiss, Economic Analysis, Corporate Law, and the ALI Corporate Governance Project, 70 Cornell
L. Rev. 1 (1984).
Weiss, Whose Rules Should Govern Takeovers: Delaware’s, the ALI’s, or Martin Lipton’s?, 33
Ariz. L. Rev. 761 (1991).
Westbrook and Ziegel, The American Law Institute NAFTA Insolvency Project, 23 Brook. J. Int’l L.
7 (1997).
White, Evaluating Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code: A Preliminary Empirical Expedition,
75 Mich. L. Rev. 1262 (1977).
James J. White and Robert S. Summers, Handbook of the Law Under the Uniform Commercial
Code (1972).
James J. White and Robert S. Summers, Handbook of the Law Under the Uniform Commercial
Code (2d ed. 1980).
Whitman, Commercial Law and the American Volk: A Note on Llewellyn’s German Sources for the
Uniform Commercial Code, 97 Yale L.J. 156 (1987).
Williams, The American Law Institute’s Federal Estate and Gift Tax Project, N.Y.U. 25th Ann.
Inst. on Fed. Tax 1935 (1967).
Winship, Jurisprudence and the Uniform Commercial Code: A “Commote,”31 Sw. L.J. 843
(1977).
Winship, Lawmaking and Article 6 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 41 Ala. L. Rev. 673 (1990).
Woodward, The Realist and Secured Credit: Grant Gilmore, Common law Courts, and Article 9
Reform Process (Symposium on the Priority of Secured Debt), Cornell L. Rev. (forthcoming
1997).
Wright, Restructuring Federal Jurisdiction: The American Law Institute Proposals, 26 Wash. &
Lee L. Rev. 185 (1969).
Young, Proposed Revisions of the Federal Estate and Gift Tax Laws: The ALI Revisited, 5 Ga. L.
Rev. 75 (1970).

Accumulations Act (1938) [see “Law of Property Act”]
Administration of the Criminal Law (1930-1935)
• Double Jeopardy (1931-1935)
• Summoning Witnesses in One State to Testify in Another State (1930-1931)
American Law: A Moral Inventory (1949-1951) [discontinued]
Business Associations [see Restatement of the Law (First)]
Code of Criminal Procedure (1924-1930)
Code of Evidence/Code of Rules of Evidence [see “Model Code of Evidence”]
Compensation and Liability for Product and Process Injuries [see “Enterprise Responsibility for Personal
Injury”]
Complex Litigation: Statutory Recommendations and Analysis (1984-1994) [formerly “Preliminary Study
of Complex Litigation”and “Complex Litigation Project”]
Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (1936-1939) [with National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform
State Laws; formerly “Contribution Between Tortfeasors Act”and “An Act on Contribution Among
Tortfeasors”; later known as “Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act”]
Corporate Governance Project [see “Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and
Recommendations”]
Criminal Justice-Youth:
• Youth Correction Authority Act/Program (1938-1940; 1944-1951)
• Youth Court Act (1938-1941)
Definitional Problems in Capital Gains Taxation [see “Federal Income, Estate and Gift Tax Project”]
Enterprise Responsibility for Personal Injury (1986-1991) [formerly “Compensation and Liability for
Product and Process Injuries”; Reporter’s Study issued]
Family Law Project [see “Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution: Analysis and Recommendations”]
Federal Estate and Gift Tax Project [see also “Income Tax Project/Statute”]:
• Recommendations of The American Law Institute and Reporters’ Studies (1961-1969)
• Study on Generation-Skipping Transfers Under the Federal Estate Tax (1982-1984) [Discussion
Draft issued]
Federal Income, Estate and Gift Tax Project [see also “Income Tax Project/Statute”]:
• Income Tax Problems of Corporations and Shareholders (1954-1958) [with American Bar
Association Section of Taxation; Report of Study issued]
• Study of Definitional Problems in Capital Gains Taxation (1958-1960) [Discussion Draft issued]
Federal Income Tax Project [see also “Income Tax Project/Statute”]:
• Integration of the Individual and Corporate Income Taxes (1989-1993) [Reporter’s Study of
Corporate Tax Integration issued]
• International Aspects of United States Income Taxation:
o Volume I: Proposals of The American Law Institute on United States Taxation of Foreign
Persons and of the Foreign Income of United States Persons (1982-1987)
o Volume II: Proposals of The American Law Institute on United States Income Tax
Treaties (1987-1992)
• Subchapter C: Proposals of The American Law Institute on Corporate Acquisitions and
Dispositions and Reporter’s Study on Corporate Distributions (1974-1982)
• Subchapter J: Proposals of The American Law Institute on the Taxation of Trust and Estate
Income and Income in Respect of Decedents (1979-1985)
• Subchapter K: Proposals of The American Law Institute on the Taxation of Partners (1976-1984)
• Subchapter C (Supplemental Study) (1986-1989) [Reporter’s Study Draft issued]
• Taxation of Private Business Enterprises (1994-1999) [formerly “Taxation of Pass-Through
Entities”; Reporter’s Study issued]
• Taxation of Innovative Financial Products (1999-2000) [discontinued]
Federal Judicial Code Revision Project (1995-2004)
Federal Securities Code (1969-1980)
Income Tax Problems of Corporations and Shareholders [see “Federal Income, Estate and Gift Tax
Project”]
Income Tax Project/Statute (1947-1954) [see also “Federal Income Tax Project”, “Federal Estate and Gift
Tax Project”, and “Federal Income, Estate and Gift Tax Project”; also known as “Federal Income
Tax Statute”; February 1954 Draft issued]
International Insolvency Project [see “Transnational Insolvency Project”]
International Jurisdiction and Judgments Project [see “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
Judgments”]
International Secured Transactions Project (1997-2001) [discontinued]
Law of Airflight (1937) [with National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and American
Bar Association; later known as “Uniform Law of Airflight”]
Law of Property Act (1935-1938) [with National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws;
formerly “Property Act”; later known as “Uniform Property Act”and “The Uniform Property Act”;
includes “Perpetuities and Accumulations Acts”]
Model Code of Evidence (1939-1942) [formerly “Code of Rules of Evidence”and “Code of Evidence”]
[A] Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure (1963-1975)
[A] Model Land Development Code (1960; 1965-1976) [formerly “Public Control of Land Use and Land
Planning”]
Model Penal Code (1950-1962)
Model Penal Code Commentaries (1976-1985) [2 parts]
Model Penal Code: Sentencing (1999- )
[New] [Uniform] Payments Code [see “Uniform New Payments Code”under “Uniform Commercial
Code-Revisions, Amendments, and Comments to the Uniform Commercial Code”]
Paths to a “Better Way”: Litigation, Alternatives, and Accommodation (1986-1988) [Steering Committee
Report and Background Paper published at 1989 Duke Law Journal 808 (1989)]
Perpetuities Act (1938) [see “Law of Property Act”]
Property Act [see “Law of Property Act”]
Public Control of Land Use and Land Planning [see “[A] Model Land Development Code”]
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Analysis and Proposed Federal Statute (1999-2006)
[formerly “International Jurisdiction and Judgments Project”]
Statement of Essential Human Rights (1942-1945)
[A] Study of the Business of the Federal Courts (1931-1934) [with Yale School of Law]
Study of the Division of Jurisdiction Between State and Federal Courts (1959-1969)
Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure [see “Principles of Transnational Procedure”]
Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act [see “Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act”]
Uniform Law of Airflight [see “Law of Airflight”]
Uniform New Payments Code [see “Uniform New Payments Code”under “Uniform Commercial Code-
Revisions, Amendments, and Comments to the Uniform Commercial Code”]
Uniform Property Act [see “Law of Property Act”]
World Trade law : The World Trade Organization (2001- ) [formerly “Principles of Trade law : The World
Trade Organization”]:
• WTO Case Law Analyses (2001- ) [several volumes of analyses of WTO case law
published by Cambridge University Press]
• Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law (2007- )
Youth Correction Authority Act/Program (1938-1940; 1944-1951)

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

American Legal Institute General Bibliography, Codification, Codifications, studies and other ALI projects, Commercial law, Common law, Trade law, Treaties.