International humanitarian law Part 14

International humanitarian law Part 14

 

249

HAS CONDUCT IN IRAQ CONFIRMED THE MORAL INADEQUACY OF International humanitarian law ? EXAMINING THE CONFLUENCE BETWEEN CONTRACT THEORY AND THE SCOPE OF CIVILIAN IMMUNITY DURING ARMED CONFLICT
Samuel Vincent Jones
Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law
Volume 16, Number 2, Spring 2006 p.249

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

250

State Liability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law – The Distomo Case Before the German Federal Constitutional Court
Markus Rau
German Law Journal
Volume 7, Number 7, July 2006 p.701-720

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

251

Reflections on Some Sources and Methods of International Criminal and Humanitarian Law
Ilias Bantekas
International Criminal Law Review
Volume 6, Number 1, 2006 p.121-136

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

252

The Legality of Humanitarian Intervention under Traditional International Law
Sulyok, Gábor
Acta Juridica Hungarica
Volume 46, Number 3-4, December 2005 p.221-248

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

253

Selected articles on International Humanitarian Law
International Review of the Red Cross
Volume 87, Number 860, December 2005

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

254

Between Policy and Principle: An Exploration of the Role of Human Rights in International Law
Andrew Imbrie
Dartmouth Law Journal
Volume 4, Issue 1, Winter 2006

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

Since its formal inception in 1648 with the Treaty of Westphalia , the subject and practice of international law has given rise to interminable debates over its precise character, application, and degree of effectiveness. These debates are largely centered on–and determined by–the extent to which sovereign nation-states are willing to cede their exclusive claim of a right to exercise supreme authority over a given territory to a supranational entity. As a result, the body of Treaties and customary norms that one regards today as comprising international law are of a relatively ambiguous character. According to the United Nations, the goal of international law is to encourage “respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms,”and yet it must also pledge to abstain from intervening “in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any State.”Although ostensibly contradictory, these two goals are not necessarily mutually-exclusive of one another. What is missing–and consequently what prevents international law from realizing its full potential as a regulator of state actions–is a guiding principle or strategy to justify its response to humanitarian crises. In what follows, I argue in support of a qualified notion of human rights as the end or purpose to which international law ought to be directed.

255

Contextualized Legal Reviews for the Methods and Means of Warfare: Cave Combat and International humanitarian law
James D. Fry
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law
Volume 44, Number 2, 2006 p.453

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

256

Caught in the Cold: International humanitarian law and Prisoners of War During the Cold War
Stephanie Carvin
Journal of Conflict and Security Law
Volume 11, Number 1, Spring 2006 p.67-92

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

257

Tort au canadien: A Proposal for Canadian Tort Legislation on Gross Violations of International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
Caroline Davidson
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Volume 38, Number 5, November 2005 p.1403

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

258

Is International Humanitarian Law Lapsing into Irrelevance in the War on International Terror?
Dan Belz
Theoretical Inquiries in Law
Volume 7, Number 1, January 2006 p.97

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

259

Precision attack and international humanitarian law
Michael N. Schmitt
International Review of the Red Cross
Volume 87, Number 859, September 2005 p.445

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

260

National implementation of international humanitarian law Biannual update on national legislation and case law, January-June 2005
International Review of the Red Cross
Volume 87, Number 859, September 2005 p.587

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

261

International humanitarian law in the twenty-first century
Yves Sandoz
Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law
Volume 6, 2003 p.3

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

262

International humanitarian law after September 11: challenges and the need to respond
Dieter Fleck
Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law
Volume 6, 2003 p.41

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

263

The conduct of hostilities during Operation Iraqi Freedom: an international humanitarian law assessment
Michael N. Schmitt
Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law
Volume 6, 2003 p.73

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

264

Violations of international humanitarian law by United Nations forces and their legal consequences
Keiichiro Okimoto
Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law
Volume 6, 2003 p.199

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

265

A guide to state practice concerning International Humanitarian Law
Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law
Volume 6, 2003 p.445

LAW JOURNAL / LAW REVIEW

With commentaries by: Kevin Afghani, Giovanni Carlo Bruno, Burrus M. Carnahan, Jose Alejandro Consigli, Eric David, Thomas Desch, Rosa Dinuzzi, Treasa Dunworth, Valeria Eboli, Ola Engdahl, Ornella Ferrajolo, Kamel Filali, Valentina Della Fina, Jose A. Guevara, Michael E. Hartmann, Djura Inomzoda, Emmanuel Kasimbazi, Nico Keijzer, Phenyo Keiseng Rakate, Peter Kustor, Amina Maneggia, Mustafa Mari, Tim McCormack, Dimpho Mogami, Mehrdad Molaei, Ray Murphy, Maria Nybondas, Peter Otken, Antoni Pigrau Sole, Rafael Prieto Sanjuan, Joseph Rikhof, A.P.V. Rogers, Soliman M. Santos, Jr., Gregor Schotten, Yuval Shany, Elies van Sliedregt, Gabriel Pablo Valladares

Conclusion

Notes

See Also

References and Further Reading

About the Author/s and Reviewer/s

Author: international

Mentioned in these Entries

International Humanitarian Law, International humanitarian law, International humanitarian law.


Posted

in

, ,

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *